Log in

No account? Create an account

April 25th, 2017

Jewish leaders formally declared war on Germany long before World War II.

Originally posted by lorddreadnought at Jewish leaders formally declared war on Germany long before World War II.

Long before the Hitler government began restricting the rights of the German Jews, the leaders of the worldwide Jewish community formally declared war on the "New Germany" at a time when the U.S. government and even the Jewish leaders in Germany were urging caution in dealing with the new Hitler regime.

The March 24, 1933 issue of The Daily Express of London described how Jewish leaders, in combination with powerful international Jewish financial interests, had launched a boycott of Germany for the express purpose of crippling her already precarious economy in the hope of bringing down the new Hitler regime.

It was only then that Germany struck back in response. Thus, if truth be told, it was the worldwide Jewish leadership - not the Third Reich - that effectively fired the first shot in the Second World War. Prominent New York attorney Samuel Untermyer was one of the leading agitators in the war against Germany, describing the Jewish campaign as nothing less than a "holy war."

According to the Express:

The whole of Israel throughout the world is uniting to declare an economic and financial war on Germany. The appearance of the Swastika as the symbol of the new Germany has revived the old war symbol of Judas to new life. Fourteen million Jews scattered over the entire world are tight to each other as if one man, in order to declare war against the German persecutors of their fellow believers.

The Express said that Germany was "now confronted with an international boycott of its trade, its finances, and its industry.... In London, New York, Paris and Warsaw, Jewish businessmen are united to go on an economic crusade."

This truly could be described as "the first shot fired in the Second World War."

In a similar vein, the Jewish newspaper Natscha Retsch wrote:

The war against Germany will be waged by all Jewish communities, conferences, congresses... by every individual Jew. Thereby the war against Germany will ideologically enliven and promote our interests, which require that Germany be wholly destroyed.

The attacks on Germany did not cease. The worldwide Jewish leadership became ever the more belligerent and worked itself into a frenzy. An International Jewish Boycott Conference was held in Amsterdam to coordinate the ongoing boycott campaign. It was held under the auspices of the self-styled World Jewish Economic Federation, of which famous New York City attorney and longtime political power broker, Samuel Untermyer, was elected president.

Upon returning to the United States in the wake of the conference, Untermyer delivered a speech over WABC Radio (New York), a transcript of which was printed in The New York Times on August 7, 1933.

Untermyer's inflammatory oratory called for a "sacred war" against Germany, making the flat-out allegation that Germany was engaged in a plan to "exterminate the Jews." He said (in part):

...Germany [has] been converted from a nation of culture into a veritable hell of cruel and savage beasts.

The Jews are the aristocrats of the world. From time immemorial they have been persecuted and have seen their persecutors come and go. They alone have survived. And so will history repeat itself, but that furnishes no reason why we should permit this reversion of a once great nation to the Dark Ages or fail to rescue these 600,000 human souls from the tortures of hell....

The Jewish leaders were not bluffing. The boycott was an act of war not solely in metaphor: it was a means, well crafted, to destroy Germany as a political, social and economic entity. The long term purpose of the Jewish boycott against Germany was to bankrupt her with respect to the reparation payments imposed on Germany after World War I and to keep Germany demilitarized and vulnerable.

In 1933, the German economy was in a shambles. Some 3 million Germans were on public assistance with a total of 6 million unemployed. Hyper-inflation had destroyed the economic vitality of the German nation. Furthermore, the anti-German propaganda pouring out of the global press strengthened the resolve of Germany's enemies, especially the Poles and their hawkish military high command.

Contrary to popular myth, the Jews remained "free" inside Germany - albeit subject to laws which did restrict certain of their privileges - prior to the outbreak of World War II.

Yet, the other little-known fact is that just before the war began, the leadership of the world Jewish community formally declared war on Germany - above and beyond the ongoing six-year- long economic boycott launched by the worldwide Jewish community when the Nazi Party came to power in 1933.

Here's the story behind the story: Chaim Weizmann (above), president of both the international "Jewish Agency" and of the World Zionist Organization (and later Israel's first president), told British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain in a letter published in The London Times on September 6, 1939 that:

I wish to confirm, in the most explicit manner, the declarations which I and my colleagues have made during the last month, and especially in the last week, that the Jews stand by Great Britain and will fight on the side of the democracies. Our urgent desire is to give effect to these declarations [against Germany].

We wish to do so in a way entirely consonant with the general scheme of British action, and therefore would place ourselves, in matters big and small, under the coordinating direction of His Majesty's Government. The Jewish Agency is ready to enter into immediate arrangements for utilizing Jewish manpower, technical ability, resources, etc.

On February 4, 1936, a Croatian-Jewish student named David Frankfurter, heeding the worldwide call for Jewish "Holy War" against the German people, shot to death Wilhelm Gustloff who was the leader of the Swiss NSDAP .

On the morning of 7 November 1938, Jew Herschel Grynszpan, went to the German embassy in Paris and asked to speak with an embassy official. After he was taken to the office of Ernst vom Rath, He shot the 29-year-old vom Rath five times, mortally wounding him with bullets to the spleen, stomach and pancreas. Vom Rath was a professional German diplomat with the Foreign Office who openly expressed anti-Nazi sympathies.

Chaim Weizmann, president of both the international "Jewish Agency" and of the World Zionist Organization (and later Israel's first president), told British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain in a letter published in The London Times on September 6, 1939 that:

I wish to confirm, in the most explicit manner, the declarations which I and my colleagues have made during the last month, and especially in the last week, that the Jews stand by Great Britain and will fight on the side of the democracies. Our urgent desire is to give effect to these declarations [against Germany].

We wish to do so in a way entirely consonant with the general scheme of British action, and therefore would place ourselves, in matters big and small, under the coordinating direction of His Majesty's Government. The Jewish Agency is ready to enter into immediate arrangements for utilizing Jewish manpower, technical ability, resources, etc.

The agreement between Germany and Theodor Herzl the head of the Zionist movement for Jews to travel to Palestine was refused by Lord Victor Rothschild, the British government minister responsible for Palestine, so that the Jews then became stuck in the camps and became factory and camp workers during the war.

It was only then that Germany struck back in response and placed treacherous jews into the concentration camps.

promo misdivision december 23, 2018 18:55 2
Buy for 10 tokens
French Officials: Robert De Niro is a Pedophile. Almost 20 years ago, a sex scandal involving Robert De Niro, Arabian princes, French government officials, and a famous tennis player named Wojtek Fibak was exposed. However, it did not erupt in the media, and most people probably didn’t…

The truth about Diversity and White Genocide.

Originally posted by lorddreadnought at The truth about Diversity and White Genocide.

So today we have a racial catastrophe in US and Europe, and the Jews with their puppet politicians are pumping their lies and filth into all of us every day.

“... this will arguably be the third great revolution of America, if we can prove that we literally can live without having a dominant European culture.” -Bill Clinton, US President 1992 to 2000

Diversity is their code word for White genocide" and "Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White” and other popular animations. The entire political establishment is leftist and anti-White because a unified White people are the only force standing in the way of the Globalist and zionist agenda.

There are five principal causes of white extinction. I am sure that other factors could be added to this list, but if just these five problems were addressed, I would no longer fear for the future of our race.

An ethic of hedonism, individualism, and selfishness that denigrates reproduction and family life;

Feminism, which encourages women to pursue careers instead of making family life their primary occupation;

The widespread use of birth control and abortion to decouple sex from pregnancy and pregnancy from child-rearing;

The rising costs of family formation, chiefly caused by racial integration—which is the driving force behind suburbanization and ex-urbanization in order to find safe spaces for whites to raise families—and by non-white immigration and offshoring industry, which lower wages for whites;

Miscegenation, in which individuals reproduce their own genes but not their race by mixing with another race.

These factors are not blind forces of nature, like an asteroid colliding with earth. They were all created by human beings. Some of them, like feminism, birth control pills, legalized abortion, and overturning racial segregation, immigration restrictions, and bans on miscegenation are quite recent. They were hatched in the minds of intellectuals, artists, scientists, politicians, educators, and advertisers. They were made real by changing people’s beliefs and values, and by altering the laws and institutions that govern us.

But all of these things could be changed. People could be taught to value family life over selfishness, hedonism, and careerism; feminism could be discouraged; access to birth control and abortion could be restricted; laws could be changed to make family formation affordable; racial separation, immigration restriction, and economic nationalism could become policy again; miscegenation could be outlawed. Indeed, White Nationalists support just such policies to halt white extinction.

But to establish the white genocide thesis, we must show that white extinction is the intended result of the policies we oppose. The first three causes of white extinction are simply products of the pursuit of individual freedom. The last two are products of individual freedom and racial egalitarianism. So isn’t it possible that white extinction is just the unintended consequence of individualism and racial egalitarianism?

Of course it is possible, and in many cases, it is true. The majority of people who advocate individualism and racial egalitarianism are simply unaware that these values are promoting the ongoing extinction of the white race. Our job is to inform them.

Didn’t you know that Anti-racism is a code word for anti-White? The focus of those that claim to be opposed to racism is always on White people who are the least racial, though the other races are fervently racist.

It is no longer controversial that Jews are massively overrepresented among Western elites in politics, the media, business, academia, and the professions. Jews are, moreover, among the principal promoters of trends conducive to white genocide, for example: non-white immigration, racial integration, miscegenation, feminism, and sexual liberation. Thus Jews support the existence of a Jewish state, Israel, as a refuge from genocide. Yet they oppose any attempt to preserve white homelands for white peoples. Israel is for Jews, but Poland, Sweden, Germany, France, and so forth are for everyone. Jews see intermarriage as a threat to Jewish survival, but they promote miscegenation for other groups and oppose anyone who would ban it. Jews recognize that a strong sense of Jewish identity, including pride in their history and achievements, is necessary for Jewish survival, but they promote multiculturalism and white guilt for the rest of us.

They aren’t just being “inconsistent” about principles. They are being perfectly consistent with their real principle of collective self-interest. They are not upholding “double standards,” because their single standard is collective self-interest. These Jews have a live and let die philosophy. They seek to profit from our destruction as a people, and they not only promote our decline but actively suppress our resistance to it.

Some jews openly advocate the white genocide, like Noel Ignatiev, a Jewish Harvard Ph.D. and the editor of the journal Race Traitor (subtitled Treason to Whiteness is Loyalty to Humanity), speak of “deconstructing” the “concept” of whiteness, which sounds like a harmless language game until you grasp that they think race just is a social construct.

The decision by US political establishment has already been made: We aren’t going to ask the American people what they think about immigration. We’re just going to do this because we think we’re right, and at a certain point it will be impossible to reverse, because Republicans will never be able to win another national election.

Until Trump started talking about immigration, most Americans had no idea that immigrants take more government assistance than natives, that we are allowing nearly half a million anchor babies a year to force their way into citizenship and a lifetime of welfare, and that we’re bringing in rapists, murderers and terrorists.

Once the Democrats and leftist get the voters they want through immigration, they will be like kids in a candy store. What will they do first? Ban private ownership of guns. Strip Christian churches of their tax exemptions for being “homophobic“. Release black criminals from prison and shut down most of the police departments. All the debates we have now on talk radio and cable news will be completely irrelevant. The most left-wing policies imaginable will be enacted, with no opposition—as they are today in California.

In the US this is a MAJOR problem because Whites are forced to pay for these Black Hard-Wired mating patterns. It's unsustainable. If blacks are not shipped back to Africa and allowed by Whites to build their own African societies to determine their own destinies, America, the free world and Western civilization will be destroyed.

Europe is a good example to multicultural apocalypse. In Denmark, in ONE year, 29% of asylum seekers commit a crime. 34.5% of rapes are committed by muslims, despite being 4% of the population. After 3 years, 87% of Syrians are unemployed. 28% of prison inmates are muslim. 9 groups are more criminal than the average. 8 of them are muslim.

Even corrected for socio-economics. So in reality it is much worse. Overall more than half of all non-western immigrants are on welfare. Even counting those who have been here for decades. Somalis have an unemployoment rate of over 80%.

Another example is Sveden. In 1975, the Swedish parliament unanimously decided to change the former homogeneous Sweden into a multicultural country. Forty years later the dramatic consequences of this experiment emerge: violent crime has increased by 300%.

If one looks at the number of rapes, however, the increase is even worse. In 1975, 421 rapes were reported to the police; in 2014, it was 6,620. That is an increase of 1,472%.

Sweden is now number two on the global list of rape countries. According to a survey from 2010, Sweden, with 53.2 rapes per 100,000 inhabitants, is surpassed only by tiny Lesotho in Southern Africa, with 91.6 rapes per 100,000 inhabitants.

Gay terror in US. The shocking truth.

Originally posted by lorddreadnought at Gay terror in US. The shocking truth.

Now propaganda of sodomy and other sexual deviations in America is completely out of control.

Each year JP Morgan Chase sends its employees a survey asking questions related to management and other non-controversial issues. The survey included very personal questions for the first time.

Questions asked were: Are you a member of the LGBT community? Are you an ally of the LGBT community, but not personally identifying as LGBT?

Employees are alarmed by these social activist questions. If they answer no, they fear they would be open to criticism that may affect their employment.

"This survey wasn't anonymous. You had to enter your employee ID. With the way things are going…not selecting that [pro-gay] option is essentially saying 'I'm not an ally of civil rights;' which is a vague way to say 'I'm a bigot.' The worry among many of us is that those who didn't select that poorly placed, irrelevant option will be placed on the 'you can fire these people first' list." – JP Morgan Chase employee

Freedom of speech is over in U.S. The tech world surrendered to political correctness enforced through a public shaming on social media.

Brendan Eich, the newly named CEO of the software firm Mozilla Corporation, resigned from the post after angering gay rights activists and some in the tech industry for his opposition to same-sex marriage.

Eich's views on gay marriage came to light in the days following his appointment last week to run Mozilla, best-known for its Firefox browser. News re-emerged of a $1,000 donation he made in 2008 supporting California's Proposition 8, an anti-gay marriage referendum.

Since then two former Mozilla developers and the dating site OKCupid, among others, have publicly condemned the software development firm for appointing a known supporter of the anti-gay law -- voters passed Prop 8, but it was later shot down by the Supreme Court. Critics urged that web users try a different browser.

Organization President Brian Brown said Eich had been the "target of a vicious character attack by gay activists who have forced him out of the company he has helped lead for years."

Eich' s technical reputation is strong. He created JavaScript and helped write the code to run Netscape's Navigator web browser before co-founding Mozilla.

Mozilla, which is based in Mountain View, Calif., declined to make any further comment Friday. Eich did not respond to requests for comment.

Harmeet Dhillon, vice chairman of the California Republican Party, said Silicon Valley can be intolerant, and noted 52 percent of California voters supported the anti-gay marriage measure.

You still have free speech in a strict technical sense: the federal government will not hunt you down. The bill of rights protects you from them, but only from them. Every cultural marxist will hunt you down now. they'll find out how you voted, then attack you.

This is how the bitter winners of a war behave, and the cultural marxists believe they have won a war. They are out to hunt down the surviving losers. some winners will let bygones be bygones, but not these people. They hate with a burning passion rarely seen outside of a physical war.

White male in US who doesn't like gays, jews or blacks and mexicans or who opposes the government's open-borders immigration policy or who is against more gun control laws is very likely to be a "hate criminal." If a heterosexual White male says that he thinks there's already too much "sexual diversity" in the country or expresses his disapproval of homosexual couples or of White women who have Black boy friends, then he's definitely someone to keep an eye on. And if he distributes any sort of printed material expressing his Politically Incorrect views, then he should be regarded as a potential terrorist.

The instructors the ADL and the other Jewish groups send around to brainwash police personnel and let the cops know that of course, the Constitution was never meant to protect "hate criminals." The First Amendment was never meant to protect all forms of speech, just as the Second Amendment is really only about government militias and bestows no individual right to keep and bear arms. One of the ADL's principal contributors during the 1980s was the notorious Jewish crime boss Moe Dalitz, the "godfather" of Las Vegas. Dalitz gave the ADL so much money from his various criminal operations that in 1985 the ADL gave a tribute banquet for him and presented him with its annual "Torch of Liberty" award for that year. Shortly afterward Dalitz was killed in a shootout with a rival gang that left seven other gangsters dead as well. In 90-s the ADL had its offices in San Francisco and Los Angeles raided by police with search warrants who found thousands of stolen confidential police files which the ADL had acquired illegally by having its agents inside California law-enforcement agencies.

One might think that with a record like the ADL has, law-enforcement agencies would scrupulously avoid any contact with the organization. The unfortunate fact is that most law-enforcement agencies aren't even aware of the ADL's history of criminal affiliations and activities. They aren't aware of these things because the controlled media to a large degree have avoided saying anything about them. Cops tend to be the sort of people who believe what they are told by the mass media, because of the media's aura of authority. Cops are authoritarians. If they see it on TV they believe it; if it's not on TV then it's not real. And the Jewish bosses of the mass media protect Jewish organizations such as the ADL.

The media don't talk about the criminal nature of the ADL; instead they always refer to it in glowing terms as a "public service organization" or a "human rights organization," and the cops accept this description without asking questions. Today's cops have been taught that they aren't permitted to thump Blacks who demonstrate with Jesse Jackson the way they used to thump Blacks who demonstrated with Martin Luther King 35 years ago. It was bad to have thumped King's demonstrators, they are told, but if they want to thump someone today they should thump White "hate criminals." And that's what they do.

You can't just let them win every battle then shake their hand and smile and say thanks, can you punch me in the face yet again, and hey don't worry, I definitely won't hit back ever no matter what you do to me.

Our situation now is very similar to the last days of Roman Empire.

When Rome was young there were always enough true Romans to assure her success and prosperity. Later, however, the Romans abandoned the faith of their fathers, squandered their patrimony, and became corrupt and decadent. In the end sodomites took all the power in the country. And so Rome fell.

And, from the long viewpoint of History, that was right and proper. Those nations live which deserve to live, and those die which deserve to die.

Does America — does the West — deserve to live? Does our race deserve to live?

Does America — does the West — deserve to live? Does our race deserve to live?

ZOG madness. The Complete Guide to Killing Non-Jews.

Originally posted by lorddreadnought at Zionist madness. The Complete Guide to Killing Non-Jews.

When is it permissible to kill non-Jews? The book "Torat ha-Melekh" [The King's Teaching - INT], which was just published, was written by Rabbi Yitzhak Shapira, the dean of the Od Yosef Hai yeshiva in the community of Yitzhar near Nablus, together with another rabbi from the yeshiva, Yossi Elitzur. The book contains no fewer than 230 pages on the laws concerning the killing of non-Jews, a kind of guide for anyone who ponders the question of if and when it is permissible to take the life of a non-Jew.

Although the book is not being distributed by the leading book companies, it has already received warm recommendations from right-wing elements, including recommendations from important rabbis such as Yitzhak Ginsburg, Dov Lior and Yaakov Yosef, that were printed at the beginning of the book. The book is being distributed via the Internet and through the yeshiva, and at this stage the introductory price is NIS 30 per copy. At the memorial ceremony that was held over the weekend in Jerusalem for Rabbi Meir Kahane, who was killed nineteen years ago, copies of the book were sold.

Throughout the book, the authors deal with in-depth theoretical questions in Jewish religious law regarding the killing of non-Jews. The words "Arabs" and "Palestinians" are not mentioned even indirectly, and the authors are careful to avoid making explicit statements in favor of an individual taking the law into his own hands. The book includes hundreds of sources from the Bible and religious law. The book includes quotes from Rabbi Abraham Isaac Kook, one of the fathers of religious Zionism, and from Rabbi Shaul Yisraeli, one of the deans of the Mercaz Harav Yeshiva, the stronghold of national-religious Zionism that is located in Jerusalem.

The book opens with a prohibition against killing non-Jews and justifies it, among other things, on the grounds of preventing hostility and any desecration of God's name. But very quickly, the authors move from prohibition to permission, to the various dispensations for harming non-Jews, with the central reason being their obligation to uphold the seven Noahide laws, which every human being on earth must follow. Among these commandments are prohibitions on theft, bloodshed and idolatry. [The seven Noahide laws prohibit idolatry, murder, theft, illicit sexual relations, blasphemy and eating the flesh of a live animal, and require societies to institute just laws and law courts - INT]

"When we approach a non-Jew who has violated the seven Noahide laws and kill him out of concern for upholding these seven laws, no prohibition has been violated," states the book, which emphasizes that killing is forbidden unless it is done in obedience to a court ruling. But later on, the authors limit the prohibition, noting that it applies only to a "proper system that deals with non-Jews who violate the seven Noahide commandments."

The book includes another conclusion that explains when a non-Jew may be killed even if he is not an enemy of the Jews. "In any situation in which a non-Jew's presence endangers Jewish lives, the non-Jew may be killed even if he is a righteous Gentile and not at all guilty for the situation that has been created," the authors state. "When a non-Jew assists a murderer of Jews and causes the death of one, he may be killed, and in any case where a non-Jew's presence causes danger to Jews, the non-Jew may be killed."

One of the dispensations for killing non-Jews, according to religious law, applies in a case of din rodef [the law of the "pursuer," according to which one who is pursuing another with murderous intent may be killed extrajudicially] even when the pursuer is a civilian. "The dispensation applies even when the pursuer is not threatening to kill directly, but only indirectly," the book states. "Even a civilian who assists combat fighters is considered a pursuer and may be killed. Anyone who assists the army of the wicked in any way is strengthening murderers and is considered a pursuer. A civilian who encourages the war gives the king and his soldiers the strength to continue. Therefore, any citizen of the state that opposes us who encourages the combat soldiers or expresses satisfaction over their actions is considered a pursuer and may be killed. Also, anyone who weakens our own state by word or similar action is considered a pursuer."

Rabbis Shapira and Elitzur determine that children may also be harmed because they are "hindrances." The rabbis write as follows: "Hindrances - babies are found many times in this situation. They block the way to rescue by their presence and do so completely by force. Nevertheless, they may be killed because their presence aids murder. There is justification for killing babies if it is clear that they will grow up to harm us, and in such a situation they may be harmed deliberately, and not only during combat with adults."

In addition, the children of the leader may be harmed in order to apply pressure to him. If attacking the children of a wicked ruler will influence him not to behave wickedly, they may be harmed. "It is better to kill the pursuers than to kill others," the authors state.

In a chapter entitled "Deliberate harm to innocents," the book explains that war is directly mainly against the pursuers, but those who belong to the enemy nation are also considered the enemy because they are assisting murderers.

Retaliation also has a place and purpose in this book by Rabbis Shapira and Elitzur. "In order to defeat the enemy, we must behave toward them in a spirit of retaliation and measure for measure," they state. "Retaliation is absolutely necessary in order to render such wickedness not worthwhile. Therefore, sometimes we do cruel deeds in order to create the proper balance of terror."

In one of the footnotes, the two rabbis write in such a way that appears to permit individuals to act on their own, outside of any decision by the government or the army.

"A decision by the nation is not necessary to permit shedding the blood of the evil kingdom," the rabbis write. "Even individuals from the nation being attacked may harm them."

Unlike books of religious law that are published by yeshivas, this time the rabbis added a chapter containing the book's conclusions. Each of the six chapters is summarized into main points of several lines, which state, among other things: "In religious law, we have found that non-Jews are generally suspected of shedding Jewish blood, and in war, this suspicion becomes a great deal stronger. One must consider killing even babies, who have not violated the seven Noahide laws, because of the future danger that will be caused if they are allowed to grow up to be as wicked as their parents."

Even though the authors are careful, as stated, to use the term "non-Jews," there are certainly those who could interpret the nationality of the "non-Jews" who are liable to endanger the Jewish people. This is strengthened by the leaflet "The Jewish Voice," which is published on the Internet from Yitzhar, which comments on the book: "It is superfluous to note that nowhere in the book is it written that the statements are directly only to the ancient non-Jews." The leaflet's editors did not omit a stinging remark directed at the GSS, who will certainly take the trouble to get themselves a copy. "The editors suggest to the GSS that they award the prize for Israel's security to the authors," the leaflet states, "who gave the detectives the option of reading the summarized conclusions without any need for in-depth study of the entire book."

One student of the Od Yosef Hai yeshiva in Yitzhar explained, from his point of view, where Rabbis Shapira and Elitzur got the courage to speak so freely on a subject such as the killing of non-Jews. "The rabbis aren't afraid of prosecution because in that case, Maimonides [Rabbi Moses ben Maimon, 1135–1204] and Nahmanides [Rabbi Moses ben Nahman, 1194–1270] would have to stand trial too, and anyway, this is research on religious law," the yeshiva student said. "In a Jewish state, nobody sits in jail for studying Torah."

Source: http://globalfire.tv/nj/09en/jews/killingguide.htm

Zionist Madness.

Originally posted by lorddreadnought at Zionist Madness.

Jesus Christ said to the Jews: "You belong to your father, the devil and you want to carry out your father's desire. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him." (John 8:44)

The United States has provided Israel with $233.7 billion in aid ‏(after adjusting for inflation‏) since the state was formed in 1948 through the end of last year. Jews and Israel have received almost $100 billion from Germany and other European countries. I must remind that Israel is a very tiny nation with only 8 million people. Israeli state also was allowed by US to have a nuclear arsenal without being subjected to the same controls of the International community as everyone else.

Why Israel is a problem. By James J. David Retired Brigadier General From RePortersNoteBook.com.

Question: Which country alone in the Middle East has nuclear weapons?
Answer: Israel.

Question: Which country in the Middle East refuses to sign the nuclear non-proliferation treaty and bars international inspections?
Answer: Israel.

Question: Which country in the Middle East seized the sovereign territory of other nations by military force and continues to occupy it in defiance of United Nations Security Council resolutions?
Answer: Israel.

Question: Which country in the Middle East routinely violates the international borders of another sovereign state with warplanes and artillery and naval gunfire?
Answer: Israel.

Question: What American ally in the Middle East has for years sent assassins into other countries to kill its political enemies (a practice sometimes called exporting terrorism)?
Answer: Israel.

Question: In which country in the Middle East have high-ranking military officers admitted publicly that unarmed prisoners of war were executed?
Answer: Israel.

Question: What country in the Middle East refuses to prosecute its soldiers who have acknowledged executing prisoners of war?
Answer: Israel.

Question: What country in the Middle East created 762,000 refugees and refuses to allow them to return to their homes, farms and businesses?
Answer: Israel.

Question: What country in the Middle East refuses to pay compensation to people whose land, bank accounts and businesses it confiscated?
Answer: Israel.

Question: In what country in the Middle East was a high-ranking United Nations diplomat assassinated?
Answer: Israel.

Question: In what country in the Middle East did the man who ordered the assassination of a high-ranking U.N. diplomat become prime minister?
Answer: Israel.

Question: What country in the Middle East blew up an American diplomatic facility in Egypt and attacked a U.S. ship, the USS Liberty, in international waters, killing 34 and wounding 171 American sailors?
Answer: Israel.

Question: What country in the Middle East employed a spy, Jonathan Pollard, to steal classified documents and then gave some of them to the Soviet Union?
Answer: Israel.

Question: What country at first denied any official connection to Pollard, then voted to make him a citizen and has continuously demanded that the American president grant Pollard a full pardon?
Answer: Israel.

Question: What Middle East country allows American Jewish murderers to flee to its country to escape punishment in the United States and refuses to extradite them once in their custody?
Answer: Israel

Question: What Middle East country preaches against hate yet builds a shrine and a memorial for a murderer who killed 29 Palestinians while they prayed in their Mosque.
Answer: Israel

Question: What country on Planet Earth has the second most powerful lobby in the United States, according to a recent Fortune magazine survey of Washington insiders?
Answer: Israel.

Question: Which country in the Middle East deliberately targeted a U.N. Refugee Camp in Qana, Lebanon and killed 103 innocent men, women, and especially children?
Answer: Israel

Question: Which country in the Middle East is in defiance of 69 United Nations Security Council resolutions and has been protected from 29 more by U.S. vetoes?
Answer: Israel.

Question: Which country in the Middle East receives more than one-third of all U.S. aid yet is the 16th richest country in the world?
Answer: Israel

Question: Which country in the Middle East receives U.S. weapons for free and then sells the technology to the Republic of China even at the objections of the U.S.?
Answer: Israel

Question: Which country in the Middle East routinely insults the American people by having its Prime Minister address the United States Congress and lecturing them like children on why they have no right to reduce foreign aid?
Answer: Israel

Question: Which country in the Middle East had its Prime Minister announce to his staff not to worry about what the United States says because "We control America?"
Answer: Israel

Question: What country in the Middle East was cited by Amnesty International for demolishing more than 4000 innocent Palestinian homes as a means of ethnic cleansing.
Answer: Israel

Question: Which country in the Middle East has just recently used a weapon of mass destruction, a one-ton smart bomb, dropping it in the center of a highly populated area killing 15 civilians including 9 children?
Answer: Israel

Question: Which country in the Middle East routinely kills young Palestinian children for no reason other than throwing stones at armored vehicles, bulldozers, or tanks?
Answer: Israel

Question: Which country in the Middle East signed the Oslo Accords promising to halt any new Jewish Settlement construction, but instead, has built more than 270 new settlements since the signing?
Answer: Israel

Question: Which country in the Middle East has assassinated more than 100 political officials of its opponent in the last 2 years while killing hundreds of civilians in the process, including dozens of children?
Answer: Israel

Question: Which country in the Middle East regularly violates the Geneva Convention by imposing collective punishment on entire towns, villages, and camps, for the acts of a few, and even goes as far as demolishing entire villages while people are still in their homes?
Answer: Israel

James J. David is a retired Brigadier General and a graduate of the U.S. Army's Command and General Staff College, and the National Security Course, National Defense University, Washington, DC. He served as a Company Commander with the 101st Airborne Division in the Republic of Vietnam in 1969 and 1970 and also served nearly 3 years of Army active duty in and around the Middle East from 1967-1969.

Stalin was canonised in Putin's Russia.

Originally posted by lorddreadnought at Stalin was canonised in Putin's Russia.

President Vladimir Putin has also taken on the task of refreshing Russian history with a new perspective. He is on record lamenting the collapse of the Soviet Union as "the greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the century". As he has said: "It was worse, apparently, than World War I, worse than World War II". Accordingly, this paradigm has been agreed and the policy of Russia in the past 16 years, whose main goal is to recreate the collapsed empire in 1991. Russian aggression against the Republic of Georgia was received by the international community in a spirit of compromise, and world powers agreed to the annexation of 20% of Georgian territories spurred Russia to annex the peninsula of Crimea from Ukraine and the creation of zones of conflict in the eastern regions of the country. Only the desperate resistance of Ukrainian people delayed the realisation of that plan.

Last year, the president informed a group of history teachers that Russia has nothing to be ashamed of Stalin and that it was their job to present a more balanced picture of Joseph Stalin, described in one approved volume as "the most successful Soviet leader ever." I must recall that Stalin was inventor of holodomor with at least 7 million white people dead in Ukraine in 1932-1933. Millions of white people also starved to death in other Soviet made-man famines in 1922 and in 1947. The death toll of starved to death in USSR is more than 15 million people. Yes, Stalin was very successful in exterminating white European people on the territory of USSR.

Russian main holiday and historical event is "victory" over Germany, Italy and Japan in second World War and "liberation" of Europe. In modern Russian propaganda Stalin is the main creator of that "victory". After that "victory" millions of European people were raped and killed by Red russian liberators. But Putin has never apologised for communist atrocities against Germany and other European countries, all he preached was a holocaust.

Putin officially honours Stalin as the greatest leader, while Russia's Orthodox Church has been made ikons with Joseph Stalin.

Russian President Vladimir Putin:

“Regrettably, in some European countries the Nazi virus 'vaccine' created at the Nuremberg Tribunal is losing its effect. The situation in Ukraine, where nationalists and other radical groups provoked an anti-constitutional coup d’état in February,causes particular concern in this respect.”

“First and foremost it is worth acknowledging that the demise of the Soviet Union was the greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the century.”

“The Stalin regime never aimed to exterminate entire ethnic groups.”

“The victory in May 1945 is a symbol of unity of the multinational people of Russia.”

"Russia will never forget Holocaust".

“Those that preach the ideas of nationalism, xenophobia and religious intolerance must be set rigid barriers”.

“Those who say Russia – for Russians are either dishonest people or provocateurs”.

“Soviet defeat of the Nazis should be a warning to those seeking to revive fascism today.”

“The downfall of fascism should become a lesson and a warning that retaliation is inevitable.”

Death to Red Russia. WPWW 14/88!

Donald Trump supports amnesty of illegal immigrants.

Originally posted by lorddreadnought at Donald Trump supports amnesty of illegal immigrants.

Trump’s supporters loved his promise this week to create a “deportation force” to remove all 11 million illegal immigrants living in America, and his repeated declaration that everyone here illegally will “have to go.”

But his supporters tend to overlook is his other promise — repeated in Tuesday’s Fox Business debate — that under his immigration plan “they will come back.”
That’s right. Under Trump’s immigration plan almost all of 11 million illegal aliens (save for a small minority with criminal records) will get to return and get permanent legal status to stay here in America.

On the Kelly File Thursday, Trump’s son Eric expressed frustration that the media overlooks this:
The point isn’t just deporting them, it’s deporting them and letting them back in legally. He’s been so clear about that and I know the liberal media wants to misconstrue it, but its deporting them and letting them back legally.

Eric Trump is right. His father has been crystal clear that he wants all the illegals to return and live in America.

Listen closely to what Trump is actually proposing. In an interview with CNN’s Dana Bash earlier this year, Trump explained his plan this way:
I would get people out and then have an expedited way of getting them back into the country so they can be legal…. A lot of these people are helping us … and sometimes it’s jobs a citizen of the United States doesn’t want to do. I want to move ’em out, and we’re going to move ’em back in and let them be legal.

This is a policy called “touchback” and it was first proposed in 2007 by moderate Republican Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison (TX). She offered a “touchback” amendment on the Senate floor that would have required illegal immigrants to return to their home countries to apply for a special “Z visa” that would allow them to reenter the United States in an expedited fashion and work here indefinitely.
Her amendment lost by a relatively close margin, 53-45. It was supported by most Republicans and even got five Democratic votes — Sens. Claire McCaskill, Max Baucus, Jon Tester, Byron Dorgan and John Rockefeller all voted for it.

The idea was considered so reasonable that in an April 22, 2007 editorial entitled “Progress on Immigration,” the New York Times declared:
It’s not ideal, but if a touchback provision is manageable and reassures people that illegal immigrants are indeed going to the back of the line, then it will be defensible.
So what Trump is proposing today — sending illegal immigrants back to their home countries and then allowing the “good ones” to return in an “expedited” fashion — was endorsed by the liberal New York Times!

In fact, the idea even got the support of — wait for it — illegal immigrants.

In 2007, the Los Angeles Times did the first telephone poll of illegal immigrants and asked whether they would go home under a “touchback” law that allowed them to return with legal status. Sixty-three percent said yes, 27% said no and 10% were undecided. If they were promised a path to citizenship when they returned, the number who said they would leave and return legally grew to 85%.

Donald Trump’s detractors were aghast at his invocation during the Fox Business debate of President Dwight D. Eisenhower’s “Operation Wetback” which forcibly removed 1.5 million illegal immigrants, and his promise the following day to establish a “deportation force” to remove the 11 million illegal immigrants living in America today.

Never mind the fact that we already have a “deportation force” – it’s called US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

The fact is, Trump won’t need a “deportation force” or an “Operation Wetback” to get illegal immigrants to go home – because he has promised that they can return quickly with legal status.
The vast majority of illegal immigrants say they would voluntarily cooperate with Trump’s plan.

If anything, the “touchback” plan Trump endorses was attacked by conservatives back in 2007. In an editorial, National Review called touchback a “fraud” that gives illegal aliens “their own privileged pathway” ahead of “applicants who have complied with US immigration laws.”

That is precisely what Trump is proposing. Under his plan, illegal aliens don’t have to go to the end of the line behind those who have complied with our immigration laws. They get an “expedited way of getting them back into the country so they can be legal.” They get to cut the line and then stay in America.

So if you get past Trump’s bluster, the plan he is proposing is so liberal that it earned the support of the New York Times and the opposition of National Review.
The reason is simple: Trump’s plan is in fact a form of amnesty — you just have to leave the country briefly to get it.

So when Trump says of illegal immigrants “they all have to go,” don’t overlook the fact that under his plan almost all would be able to immediately return – and stay.

This means there is very little difference between his plan and what John Kasich and Jeb Bush are supporting.

And most of his supporters don’t even realize it.

Source: http://www.aei.org/publication/message-to-the-gop-trump-supports-amnesty/

Donald Trump ‘Disavows’ David Duke’s Remarks on ‘Jewish Extremists’

Originally posted by lorddreadnought at Donald Trump ‘Disavows’ David Duke’s Remarks on ‘Jewish Extremists’

Donald Trump ‘Disavows’ David Duke’s Remarks on ‘Jewish Extremists’

In response to calls from the Anti-Defamation League, Donald J. Trump recently said that he “disavows” comments by David Duke, the former Ku Klux Klan leader, about “Jewish extremists” who opposed his candidacy.

It is the latest instance of Mr. Duke praising Mr. Trump, who was condemned by politicians across the spectrum months ago for refusing to explicitly disavow Mr. Duke, a white supremacist who has exalted the the Manhattan businessman’s political rise. Mr. Trump has previously rebutted the criticisms by saying he had disavowed Mr. Duke on other occasions.

“Jewish chutzpah knows no bounds,” Mr. Duke said on his radio program, excoriating some of the donors involved in the “Stop Trump” movement. Those donors include the billionaire financier Paul Singer, a Jew for whom Israel’s security is a primary focus in determining the candidates he backs.

“I think these Jewish extremists have made a terribly crazy miscalculation because all they’re really going to be doing by doing the ‘Never Trump’ movement is exposing their alien, their anti-American-majority position to all the Republicans,” Mr. Duke said. “And they’re going to push people more into awareness that the neo-cons are the problem, that these Jewish supremacists who control our country are the real problem and the reason why America is not great.”

Jonathan Greenblatt, the chief executive of the Anti-Defamation League, said in a statement that “David Duke’s latest remarks – smearing Jews and Jewish Republicans specifically – are as unsurprising as they are hateful.”

“The onus is now on Donald Trump to make unequivocally clear he rejects those sentiments and that there is no room for Duke and anti-Semitism in his campaign and in society,” he said. “Mr. Trump can and should speak up now. If not, his silence will speak volumes.”

Later Thursday, Mr. Trump said in a statement that he “totally disavows” Mr. Duke’s remarks.

“Antisemitism has no place our society, which needs to be united, not divided,” said Mr. Trump, who has been accused of using overtly racial appeals to motivate his largely white, working-class political base.

The Anti-Defamation League has criticized Mr. Trump before, and has redirected his previous donations to the group because of his remarks about Muslims and others. Mr. Trump has often cited his ties to the Jewish community, noting, for instance, that his son-in-law, Jared Kushner, is an Orthodox Jew, and that his daughter, Ivanka, converted to Judaism.

Source: http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2016/05/05/donald-trump-is-pressured-to-reject-david-dukes-remarks-on-jewish-extremists/

Donald Trump about David Duke for the record.

Originally posted by lorddreadnought at Donald Trump about David Duke for the record.

Here is a full chronology of Donald Trump’s statements on white supremacist David Duke.

Unlike most other top Republican officials, Trump generally does not couple his statements about Duke with a firm condemnation of Duke’s views. Instead, his answers are often reactive, such as “I would do that [repudiate Duke], if it made you feel better.”


CNN’s Larry King: “Did the David Duke thing bother you? Fifty-five percent of the whites in Louisiana voted for him.”

Trump: “I hate seeing what it represents, but I guess it just shows there’s a lot of hostility in this country. There’s a tremendous amount of hostility in the United States.”

King: “Anger?”

Trump: “It’s anger. I mean, that’s an anger vote. People are angry about what’s happened. People are angry about the jobs. If you look at Louisiana, they’re really in deep trouble. When you talk about the East Coast, it’s not the East Coast. It’s the East Coast, the middle coast, the West Coast…”


“The Reform Party now includes a Klansman, Mr. Duke, a neo-Nazi, Mr. [Patrick] Buchanan, and a communist, Ms. [Lenora] Fulani. This is not company I wish to keep.”

— Trump, in a statement saying he will not accept the Reform Party nomination for president, Feb. 13, 2000

NBC’s Matt Lauer: “When you say the [Reform] party is self-destructing, what do you see as the biggest problem with the Reform Party right now?”

Trump: “Well, you’ve got David Duke just joined — a bigot, a racist, a problem. I mean, this is not exactly the people you want in your party.”

—remarks on NBC’s “Today Show,” Feb. 14, 2000


Bloomberg’s John Heilemann: “How do you feel about the David Duke quasi-endorsement?”

Trump: “I don’t need his endorsement; I certainly wouldn’t want his endorsement. I don’t need anyone’s endorsement.”

Heilemann: “Would you repudiate David Duke?”

Trump: “Sure, I would do that, if it made you feel better. I don’t know anything about him. Somebody told me yesterday, whoever he is, he did endorse me. Actually I don’t think it was an endorsement. He said I was absolutely the best of all of the candidates.”

— exchange during an interview on Bloomberg Politics, Aug. 26, 2015


“Voting for these people [Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz], voting against Donald Trump at this point is really treason to your heritage. I’m not saying I endorse everything about Trump, in fact I haven’t formally endorsed him. But I do support his candidacy, and I support voting for him as a strategic action. I hope he does everything we hope he will do.”

— David Duke, on his radio program, Feb. 25, 2016

Question: “How do you feel about the recent endorsement from David Duke?”

Trump: “I didn’t even know he endorsed me. David Duke endorsed me? Okay, all right. I disavow, okay?”

— Trump, in response to a question at a news conference, Feb. 26

Trump: “I’m sitting in a house in Florida, with a very bad earpiece that they gave me, and you could hardly hear what he was saying. But what I heard was ‘various groups.’ And I don’t mind disavowing anybody and I disavowed David Duke. And I disavowed him the day before at a major news conference…. I have no problem disavowing groups, but I’d at least like to know who they are. It would be very unfair to disavow a group if the group shouldn’t be disavowed. I have to know who the groups are. But I disavowed David Duke.”

— Interview with NBC’s “Today Show,” Feb. 29

ABC News’s George Stephanopoulos: “So, are you prepared right now to make a clear and unequivocal statement renouncing the support of all white supremacists?”

Trump: “Of course, I am. I mean, there’s nobody that’s done so much for equality as I have. You take a look at Palm Beach, Florida, I built the Mar-a-Lago Club, totally open to everybody; a club that frankly set a new standard in clubs and a new standard in Palm Beach and I’ve gotten great credit for it. That is totally open to everybody. So, of course, I am.”

–exchange on ABC’s “Good Morning America,” March 1

Trump: “We had a news conference and they asked me the exact same question. I said I disavow. Now, right after the program that we’re talking about — and I thought it was clear, but you know, we’re talking about groups, groups, groups. I do have to know the name of the group because, who knows? I mean, they have to give me the name of the group. But right after, when I reviewed it, I put out a tweet and I put out on Facebook that I totally disavow. Now everybody knew I did that but the press refused to look at that. It was right after. And I disavowed then; I disavowed today on ABC with George Stephanopoulos, I disavowed again. I mean, how many times are you supposed to disavow? But I disavow and hopefully it’s the final time I have to do it. But if you look at Facebook and if you look at Twitter, right after the show I put out a statement because I want everybody to be sure.”

Who is really fighting ISIS.

Originally posted by lorddreadnought at Who is really fighting ISIS.

U.S. Delta Force and Navy SEALs have killed more than 40 ISIS Operatives Responsible for Attacks From Paris to Egypt.

U.S. Special Ops have crippled ISIS ability to recruit foreign fighters and put pressure on the network responsible for striking Europe.

As the self-proclaimed Islamic State trumpets its global terrorist campaign, U.S. special operations forces have quietly killed more than three dozen key ISIS operatives blamed for plotting deadly attacks in Europe and beyond.

Defense officials tell The Daily Beast that U.S. special operators have killed 40 “external operations leaders, planners, and facilitators” blamed for instigating, plotting, or funding ISIS’s attacks from Brussels and Paris to Egypt and Africa.

That’s less than half the overall number of ISIS targets that special operators have taken off the battlefield, one official explained, including top leaders like purported ISIS second-in-command Haji Imam, killed in March.

The previously unpublished number provides a rare glimpse into the U.S. counterterrorist mission that is woven into overall coalition efforts to defeat ISIS, and which is credited with crippling ISIS efforts to recruit foreign fighters and carry out more plots like the deadly assault on Paris that killed 130 last fall.

As proof of the campaign’s overall success, Pentagon officials this week said the influx of foreign fighters into Iraq and Syria had dropped from up to 2,000 a month last year to just 200, and the overall size of ISIS from a high estimate of 33,000 a year ago to between 19,000 to 25,000 fighters.

The U.S. strikes have picked up pace since Secretary of Defense Ash Carter announced the deployment of special operations forces to northern Iraq last December, under the unwieldy moniker of “Expeditionary Targeting Force,” the officials said. They spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to describe the special operations mission publicly.

The officials expect that tempo to rise as the newly expanded special operations advising team inside Syria also grows from 50 to up to 300, as President Obama announced in Germany on Monday.

Officials say the Syria-based U.S. special operators help stitch together the disparate members of the Syrian Defense Force and vet others who want to join the mission, while also gathering intelligence on the ground that leads to strikes.

The Central Intelligence Agency, the National Security Agency, and other elements of the U.S. intelligence community are also driving the effort, finding and feeding the intelligence to the coalition strike force.

At the top of the special operations target list is the network of ISIS operatives blamed for “external operations”: 60 attacks in 21 countries that have killed 1,000 people since January 2015, the officials said. Most of the ISIS targets were killed in Syria, by special operations combat aircraft, but also by troops who attempted to capture a handful of high value ISIS targets in raids. All of those targets resisted arrest and were killed, the officials said.

That grim tally includes the previously announced December killing of Syrian-based ISIS member Charaffe al-Mouadan, who officials have concluded had direct ties to Abdel Hamid Abaoud, the leader of the ISIS cell that attacked Paris last November. Mouadan was among an estimated 10 militants taken out in a spec-ops air strike.

Another was Abdul Kader Hakim, killed in Mosul in December. The Pentagon called Hakim an “external operations facilitator” and a forgery specialist with links to the Paris attack network.

Sometimes the kills or attempted captures are not announced, in order to see how ISIS responds, one of the senior officials explained. “What are they doing, what are they saying, who are they communicating to? How do they backfill the missing operator?” he said. Those reactions can reveal weakness the U.S. task force can exploit.

“The point of such operations is to keep ISIS guessing,” he said.

Defense officials acknowledge the downside of the secrecy of the operations is that humanitarian and human rights organizations that try to serve as neutral arbiters in war zones don’t always know who to call when civilians report allegations of casualties or damage in the aftermath of a military strike—or when someone goes missing, possibly taken in a raid. Two senior defense officials said they were actively working to establish and maintain relationships with such agencies in areas where their troops operate, including sharing with the International Red Cross details of any detainees taken within a short time of their capture, as per Pentagon policy on detainees.

The special operations counterterrorist mission is spearheaded by troops from the Joint Special Operations Command, the U.S. military’s premier counterterrorist unit.

But unlike previous conflicts, where JSOC raiders worked in secret, usually apart from other types of special operators, the Iraq and Syria teams blend specialists from multiple disciplines. “Door kickers” from units like the U.S. Army’s Delta Force and the Navy SEALs’ Naval Special Warfare Development Group who train for hostage rescue missions or kill-capture raids are paired with operators like Green Berets who specialize in learning foreign languages and cultures, and training local forces.

“The teams are integrated in just about everything we do,” one defense official said.

The mixing of troops may have something to with the background of those in charge of the ISIS fight. Current JSOC commander Lt Gen Austin S Miller and his predecessor Gen. Tony Thomas both ran the overall special operations task force in Afghanistan, which blended the different skills of very different, sometimes competing spec-ops tribes.

Thomas now runs the U.S. Special Operations Command. Miller most recently commanded Fort Benning, Ga., where he oversaw the U.S. Army Ranger School that produced the first successful women candidates ahead of the Pentagon’s decision to open all combat roles to women.

And Gen. Joseph Votel, who previously led both USSOCOM and JSOC, now runs the ISIS campaign as head of Central Command. While rooted in the counterterrorism realm earlier in his career, he has a broader perspective on what the different special operations tribes bring to the fight.


Putin is the Russian Moshiach

Originally posted by lorddreadnought at Putin is the Russian Moshiach

Putin Visits Western Wall in Jerusalem

Putin Prays at Western Wall for Moshiach

President Putin Visiting the Jewish Museum and Tolerance Center

President Putin Meeting with Representatives of International Jewish Organizations

President Putin Meeting with Chief Rabbi of Russia and Federation of Jewish Communities

In Putin’s Return, Russian Jews see Stability

President Putin Meets Chief Rabbi Lazar

Rabbi Berel Lazar Praises Vladimir Putin

Putin Visits Western Wall with Rabbi Lazar

Jews Backed Putin, says Russia’s Chief Rabbi

Russia’s Chief Rabbi Cheers Crimea Annexation

President Putin Awards Chabad Rabbi Gold Medal

At Putin’s Side, an Army of Jewish Billionaires

Chabad to Decorate Putin with Medal at Auschwitz

Russian Jewish Officials Accompany Putin on State Visit

Russia Chief Rabbi Berel Lazar Slams Vladimir Putin’s Critics

Putin to Discuss Neo-Nazism, Anti-Semitism with Foreign Rabbis

Putin thanks Rabbis for Communities’ Fight against Nazi Revival

Russia’s Chief Rabbi thanks Putin for Support to Jewish Community

Russia’s Jews Point to Important agenda of Putin’s Upcoming Meting with Rabbis

Putin Smiled to Jews. Will Jews Smile Back?

Putin’s Chat at the Kotel

Russian Court Demands U.S. Library of Congress hand over Jewish Texts

Jewish Museum in Moscow

Russian President Vladimir Putin Tours World’s Largest Jewish Museum

Putin Promises Financial Support to Chief Rabbi Lazar for Russian Jewish Museum

Jewish Museum and Tolerance Center in Moscow

Moscow’s new Jewish Museum appeals for Tolerance

Peres Inaugurates Jewish Museum Funded by Putin, Vekselberg

In Big New Museum, Russia has a Message for Jews: We Like You

Peres and Putin to Open World’s Largest Jewish Museum

Moscow’s Jewish Museum and its Quest for an Open Society


Putin Vows: Holocaust will not be Repeated

Putin Vows ‘Russia will Never Forget Holocaust’

Russia’s Putin Outlaws Denial of Axis Crimes

President Putin Signs Law Criminalizing Revisionist Tactics

Putin tells Netanyahu Holocaust Museum to be Built

Russian President Putin to Visit Yad Vashem Tomorrow

Russia makes Holocaust Denial Illegal

Russia: To Deny Holocaust is now a Crime

Jewish Immigration

Jews Returning to Russia

Jews Who Fled the Soviet Union Return to Russia

Russia Wants its Emigrants Back

Russian relationship with Israel has grown into a strategic alliance. Putin's pro-Israel policy.

Originally posted by lorddreadnought at Russian relationship with Israel has grown into a strategic alliance. Putin's pro-Israel policy.

As we all remember in 1997, Russia denounced Israel’s actions against Hezbollah and blamed Israel for deadlock in the Arab-Israeli peace process. Overral diplomatic relations between Russia and Israel were poor.

But since ethnic Jew Vladimir Putin took power in 1999, the Russian relationship with Israel has grown firmly into a strategic alliance. Trade has grown, the two states have signed numerous cultural and technological agreements, and an enormous number of Russian Jews have immigrated to Israel.

In early 2014, Vladimir Putin expressed his wishes to continue support for Israel: “the development of a mutually advantageous and constructive relations with Israel in the political, economic, humanitarian, and other fields will remain the priority of Russia’s foreign policy.”

Strategic alliance

Israel’s role as an ally to Putin’s Russia that has become important to domestic and foreign politics. A poignant example of this importance came in January 2004 when Russia abstained from a United Nations vote condemning a security barrier Israel had constructed between Israel and the disputed territories.

A similar situation arose with Russia’s March 2014 annexation of Crimea. US, Japan and all major European states condemned that Russia’s move, United States was also urging Jerusalem to do the same, though Israel stayed mysteriously quiet. Israel officials and media instead condemned Ukrainian revolution as a dangerous nazi uprising. Israel was purposefully absent for the 27 March 2014 United Nations vote which officially condemned Russia’s annexation. The absentee decision has become economically beneficial for Israel, as trade between Russia and Israel has increased since the Crimean annexation. When the EU, United States, Australia, Canada, and Norway began sanctions, Moscow banned certain food products from these countries. Israel has taken up this trade gap by largely increasing its exports of fruit to Russia. Additionally, Israel has been approved to begin importing meat and dairy products into Russia. These agreements mean more money for Israel, security for Russia, and a stronger alliance against Western European will.

Overall, Israel’s current pursuit of a steady relationship with Russia may be attributed to three major components. First, Russia has provided first a flood, and then a steady flow of  immigrants since opening the borders in the late 1980s. As a small and new country, new, highly skilled citizens are necessary for growth.

Second, Russia provides Israel with oil and, therefore, energy security. In the future, energy and water security will be some of the biggest Israeli existential crises, so this security is imperative.

Third, though Israel fears Russia’s relationship with other Middle Eastern states, Israel hopes their alliance with Moscow may act as a buffer in future conflicts.

The sheer size of the Russian immigration to Israel caused whole Russian towns and villages to appear in Israel. Integration is unnecessary for these migrants, as they can speak Russian and find a community with all the comforts of home without becoming Israeli.

These immigrants also brought their media with them, an additional way in which to stay connected with the Russian network. There are over thirty local and national Russian newspapers and magazines, as well as numerous radio and television channels and films.

Russia has continually assured Israel, that the supplied arms to Syrian government are short-range only, implying Israel is safe from threat. Russian officials argue that keeping Mr Assad in office is good for Israel. His fall would almost certainly result in the rise of Islamic fundamentalists in Syria. As we all know, Israel demanded to apply international sanctions against Iran, due to its nuclear program. Putin's Russia has supported all United Nations Security Council Resolutions which imposed economic sanctions against Iran for failing to stop its uranium enrichment program. We also must remember when the Israeli premier Benjamin Netanyahu flew secretly to Moscow in a private jet to persuade Putin not to supply Iran with the latest surface to air missiles, Putin sacrificed his Iranian interests for his Israeli ones. The missiles were taken off the flat bed railway trucks destined for Tehran.

Cultural diplomacy with Israel under Putin’s leadership.

When Putin first visited Israel in 2005, the trip was highly publicized and aimed primarily at awareness of both Russian and Israeli people. Putin made symbolic trips to multiple holocaust memorials and met Russian Jews who fought in World War II. He also met with multiple Russian-Jewish émigrés; one of these was his old schoolteacher whom now lives in Israel. Anti-Semitism in Russia has decreased slightly since the 1990s, though only because the number of Jews remaining in Russia is a mere shadow of what it used to be: only 230,000 Jews live in Russia. The cultural sensitivity during his visit, therefore, was used as a platform for Putin to discuss his protection of all Russian Jews, as well as his plans to combat anti-Semitism in Russia. The visit, as seems a trend in Russian politics, was a combination of Russian domestic and international realpolitik. More recently, Israel transferred an area called the Sergei Courtyard, which was previously part of a compound belonging to the Moscow patriarchy, back to Russia. This 2008 move was an act of cultural acceptance and goodwill. Moscow has also established a Jewish museum.

Putin also has a strategic interest in Israel.

Back in 2009 Russia agreed to buy Israeli surveillance drones in a dealpossibly worth as much as $100 million. Russia stepped in as Israel’s defender-in-chief at the UN in October, killing a UNESCO initiative that criticized Israel. In June, on his first trip abroad since returning to office, President Putin went to Jerusalem, where he visited the Western Wall.

In the wake of Putin’s visit, representatives from Gazprom announced they were setting up a subsidiary to help develop Israel’s giant gas reserves. Russia and Israel also share a number of security concerns, including Islamist regimes in the Middle East and beyond, and the rise of Turkey both politically and in the energy geopolitics of the Middle East and Europe.

Former Prime Minister Ariel Sharon referred to Putin as a “true friend,” and this claim seems truthful as Ariel Sharon’s family emigrated from Russia and he and Putin often spoke fluent Russian together.

Strategic Partnerships.

Israel and Russia have cultivated their relationship beyond the political realm. These strategic partnerships cater to each of the state’s strengths, enhancing their bond and increasing their security in the relationship. First, Israel is considered a world superpower in military technology. Moscow has recognized the potential, inquiring into numerous collaborative military deals with Israel. Russia began buying drones from Israel in 2009 and was quite pleased with the result; Moscow ordered an additional thirty-six drones later in the year.

In September 2010, Vladimir Putin and Ehud Barak signed an agreement securing future military development and purchases between the two states. The largest deal, however, came just a month later when Israel Aerospace Industries signed a 400 million USD contract with Russia’s state-owned Oboronprom for the creation of spy drones. The Russian company will utilize Israel intelligence and design to produce the drones in Russia.

Russia has also called Israel a world power in the space and space technology fields. Israel has reduced the size and weight of their satellites and have a singular unique practice: "they launch their satellites westward, against the pull of Earth’s revolution, while all other space programs launch satellites eastward. Russia has sought to capitalize on these innovations, signing a space cooperation agreement in 2011. The agreement is far-reaching, including “areas like astrophysical and planetary research, space biology and medicine, navigational satellites and launching services, and other technology.”

Israel has also shared on Russia’s nuclear technology, including medical breakthroughs and dental imaging. Israel and Russia are also linked through energy cooperation. This part of their alliance is vital; energy security is becoming more and more crucial, and their connection is essential for the Russian energy market and for Israel’s peace of mind. In fact, Russia is Israel’s largest supplier of crude oil. With the increasing problems between the European Union and Russia, the Middle East, especially Israel, has become a more viable market for Russia. As of February 2013, Moscow has also invested in Israeli liquefied natural gas, a future boom in the energy game. The Russians have already advanced loans worth over 3.5 billion USD for excavation of the Tamar and Dalit fields, just offshore of Israel. Russian money has become essential to this Israeli project, and Israel is happy to oblige in the permanent energy partnership. At the beginning of 2014, Russia and Israel began talks about a contract for join renewable energy research as well.

Putin Remarks and Support for Israel

"I am closely tracking what is happening in Israel," Russian President Vladimir Putin remarked in a meeting with a delegation of Chief Rabbis and representatives of the Rabbinical Center of Europe.

The purpose of the meeting, according to the Kremlin, was to discuss joint efforts to prevent the rewriting of history, the fight against neo-Nazism and neo-fascism, xenophobia and anti-Semitism.

"It is important to discuss the subject of the Holocaust of the World War II era. There are Holocaust survivors among the rabbis, they have their personal, dramatic stories," Rabbi Alexander Boroda, President of the Federation of Jewish Communities of Russia, told Interfax-Religion.

Boroda was seated across from Putin during the meeting, alongside Russia's Chief Rabbi Berel Lazar, Israel's Sephardic Chief Rabbi Yitzchak Yosef, TelAviv Chief Rabbi Yisrael Meir Lau and others.

At one point during the meeting, Rabbi Yosef commented that "hours before I flew here, a rocket landed near my house in Jerusalem, the capital of the Jewish nation."

"It goes without saying there is great anxiety among my children and grandchildren who were forced to enter bomb shelters, for no fault of their own," he said, adding that it is "hard to describe the emotional damage that is being done to them. All this is just for the crime that they were born to the Jewish nation."

The Chief Rabbi concluded by asking the president to use his power "to bring a stop to the violence. There cannot be a situation where people use religion to slaughter the innocent."

Most of the Israeli population is currently living under the threat of rocket fire. Life between sirens, in and out of bomb shelters, has become the daily reality for millions of Israelis.

Hamas terrorists in Gaza have fired more than 200 rockets at Israel since Operation Protective Edge began on Monday, July 7 – and over 650 rockets since the beginning of 2014.

According a news report, Putin replied by asking Rabbi Yosef to pass along a message to Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that Russia is a true friend of Israel and of the Prime Minister.

“We have to clearly realize that any attempts to review our country’s contribution to the great victory, and to deny the Holocaust – a shameful page in the world history – isn’t just a cynical and unprincipled lie, but the oblivion of lessons from history which could result in a repeat of the tragedy,” ~ Vladimir Putin.

Quotes about Putin.

"Russia has in Vladimir Putin its “most pro-Jewish leader,” whom he credits with “fighting anti-Semitism more vigorously than any Russian leader before him.” - Russia's chief rabbi, Berel Lazar.

Politicians in today’s Russia “would not risk taking anti-Semitic or a so-called anti-Zionist stand," "Any impartial observer should acknowledge Putin’s big role in this.” - Berl Lazar, Chief Rabbi of Russia.

"Putin’s pro-Jewish tendencies are part of the reason that anti-Semitic incidents are relatively rare in Russia. In 2013, the Russian Jewish Congress documented only 10 anti-Jewish attacks and acts of vandalism, compared to dozens in France". - Mikhail Chlenov, secretary general of the Euro-Asian Jewish Congress.

“Putin has facilitated the opening of synagogues and Jewish community centers across Russia, at the Jewish community’s request. This has had a profound effect on Jewish life, especially outside Moscow,” Gorin said. “He instituted annual meetings with Jewish community leaders and attends community events. His friendship with the Jewish community has given it much prestige and set the tone for local leaders.” - Gorin, a Chabad rabbi and chairman of Moscow’s Jewish Museum and Tolerance Center

Zvi Gitelman, a professor of Judaic studies at the University of Michigan who studies the relationship between ethnicity and politics in the former Soviet Union, said “Chabad, with the help of Putin, is now the dominant religious expression of Judaism in a mostly nonreligious population,” Gitelman said.

"Putin is philosemitic and has a warm feeling for Israel, though he is a pragmatist. There are quite a few Jews among his close associates and personal friends." - Yevgeny Satanovsky, member and ex-president of Russian Jewish Congress.

"Medvedev will be wonderful for the Jews, just as Putin was" - Lev Leviev, billionaire tycoon in Israel, Jewish activist and big time Zionist.

"Friendship never hurt anyone. But I have great respect for this person [Putin] and I consider that this is a person sent to our country from God." - Arkadiy Rottenberg, Jewish-Russian multi-billionaire oligarch, personal friend of Putin and his former judo training partner. His nephew now plays for an Israeli team.

"Arkady Rotenberg proves time and time again that if you know the right people the sky is indeed the limit." - Jewish Business News.

"Putin’s pro-Jewish tendencies are part of the reason that anti-Semitic incidents are relatively rare in Russia. In 2013, the Russian Jewish Congress documented only 10 anti-Jewish attacks and acts of vandalism, compared to dozens in France.""Putin is not only not anti-Semitic, he’s philo-Semitic". - Mikhail Chlenov, one of Vice Presidents of World Jewish Congress and secretary general of the Euro-Asian Jewish Congress.

"The status of Jews in Russia, is often a barometer of how Russia rulership treats its society, Putin has been better for Russian Jews than any in Russian history, and if you want evidence of that, just ask Israel." - Stephen Cohen, professor at Princeton and New York University, CBS News consultant as well as a member of the [American] Council on Foreign Relations.

"Few would dispute that Putin has been friendly to Jewish institutional life in Russia", "Putin is good for Jews" (non-verbatim, but generally implied). - Cnaan Liphshiz and Talia Lavin, Jewish Telegraphic Agency, "Putin’s Jewish embrace: Is it love or politics".

Putin and Chabad sect in Russia. Leader of Russian Jewry, Rabbi Berel Lazar praises Vladimir Putin.

Originally posted by lorddreadnought at Putin and Chabad sect in Russia. Leader of Russian Jewry, Rabbi Berel Lazar praises Vladimir Putin.

Vladimir Putin, often described as a creature of the KGB, owed his rapid promotion to Moscow to the Family, Yeltsin's self-serving band of oligarchs and neoliberal economists, which were thought of by Bill Clinton as Russia's future. The nemesis of US's plans to reshape Russia in its image did not emerge from the communist party, but from the bowels of the regime Washington was supporting. Putin's career very nearly foundered on a scandal in which Petersburg lost $100m of food imports as barter for Russian timber, oil and other raw materials.

Russia’s back-in-office President Vladimir Putin can be sure that he has a steadfast supporter in Rabbi Berel Lazar, the country’s Chief Rabbi and Head Shliach.

With continued criticism against the Kremlin’s growing control and Russian Jewish leadership which doubted “Putin’s commitment to protecting Russia’s Jews,” Lazar stands out.

“There wasn’t a single thing that he was asked to do to benefit Judaism or the Jewish communities that he did not respond to positively,” Rabbi Lazar said about Putin, who has been ruling the country since 1999.

As President and Prime Minister, Putin “constantly took interest in the situation of the Jews in the country, showed care for their needs and has done a lot to eradicate anti-Semitism and returning Jewish buildings that were nationalized,” Rabbi Lazar told the Israeli haredi ‘Hamevaser.’

“We are nearing completion on a Jewish museum which will be one of the largest in the world. President Putin has contributed alot for the advancement of its building and he himself donated one paycheck of his, which led many others to donate as well,” he added.

Putin was inaugurated in lavish ceremony in the Kremlin on 7 May 2012 in front of the inner circles of the Russian establishment. Among the religious leaders attending were Rabbi Lazar and Alexander Boroda, the Chairman of the Board for the Federation of Jewish Communities of Russia.

“I blessed him in the name of Russian Jewry and told him that the number three in Judaism symbolizes a ‘Chazakah’ (a Halachic term for permanence),” Rabbi Lazar said.

Source: http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/news/headlines-breaking-stories/128006/rabbi-berel-lazar-praises-vladimir-putin.html#sthash.SMXVcNYK.dpuf

First Contacts from Vladimir Putin and Chabad

It is not known exactly when Putin and Lazar first met, but Putin, who is said to be impressed by Lazar’s strict religious observance, has showered Lazar with his appreciation. First and foremost among these privileges was his blessing of Lazar as chief rabbi of the Federation. This was not as simple as it may sound, since Gusinsky’s Russian Jewish Congress already had a chief rabbi—the Siberian-born Adolf Shayevich, the spiritual leader of the Russian capital’s prestigious Moscow Choral Synagogue. Shayevich refused to step down and has alleged that Leviev offered him $240,000 to resign. To this day, there are two chief rabbis of Russia and a deep enmity between the two men. Earlier this year, Shayevich called Lazar “an agent of the Kremlin” on Russian TV.

But Putin has found plenty of ways to express his preference for Lazar. He invited Lazar, not Shayevich, to his first State of the Nation speech in June 2000; the following year, he removed Shayevich from the government’s religious affairs council and appointed Lazar in his place. Lazar reciprocated by assuring the public that Putin’s actions against the likes of Gusinsky and Berezovsky had nothing to do with anti-Semitism, and that Russia at large was free of that scourge. In the face of growing Russian anti-Semitism in the middle of the first decade of the century, Lazar has toned down the latter point. He condemned a 2005 open letter signed by 500 nationalists, including members of the Russian Parliament, that called on Putin to ban all Jewish organizations. He also spoke out against violent attacks on Jews, including one on a Chabad rabbi in Moscow.

Lazar has consistently followed Putin’s lead. “Challenging the government is not the Jewish way,” Lazar has said. As a result of the Putin-Lazar bond, Chabad has become the dominant Jewish force in Russia, with synagogues, schools, festivals, extensive programming and representatives in nearly 50 cities across the country. It is reported to have a $60 million annual budget, much of it supplied by Putin’s Jewish allies, eclipsing all other Jewish denominations. In 2012, Lazar received what can only be considered the jewel in the crown: Putin gave him supervision of Moscow’s $50 million Jewish Museum and Center of Tolerance, which was largely funded by Jewish oligarchs Abramovich and Vekselberg. The Lazar-Putin relationship is so tight that during the 2014 Olympics, Putin gave the 50-year-old rabbi special dispensation to enter the stadium on Shabbat without passing through the electronic gate. Again, Lazar returned the favor: A month later, he attended the victory speech Putin gave at the Kremlin after the occupation of Crimea. He was the only Jewish leader present.

Even the secularly oriented Russian Jewish Congress, which has an annual budget of $12 million and 37 local chapters, rarely strays far from Kremlin policy. Investor Mikhail Fridman (net worth $15.6 billion), founder of Alfa Group—one of Russia’s largest privately held investment groups—and another of Putin’s Jewish oligarchs, sits on its board. The group is particularly proud of its flagship Memorial Synagogue, erected in 1998 in a huge park on Moscow’s Poklonnaya Gora, which is dedicated to the Soviet victory in World War II and to those who perished in it. The park is a reminder of the breakup of the Soviet Union into independent nations, an event that remains a gaping hole in the Russian psyche, especially Putin’s. The synagogue’s presence in Poklonnaya Gora is both a testament to the Jewish contribution to the war and an expression of allegiance to the Russian state. “Of course we support the political authorities that exist,” Russian Jewish Congress president Yuri Kanner tells me. “This is halacha.” He adds: “The most important thing is that the authorities do not hinder our efforts to rebuild Jewish life.”

Author Masha Gessen says that with respect to religion—all religions—Putin is simply continuing the policies adopted under Stalin.

“Religion is to be a subordinate part of the state,” she says. “Conflict, if there is any, is between independent clergy and their religious institution, but not between that institution and the state. And in the case of the war of the rabbis, from Putin’s perspective, both Shayevich and Lazar are subordinate to the state. Their personal rivalry might be intense, but it’s politically insignificant.”

Putin sponsoring the Jewish Communities

But in spite of the general absence of Jewish observance, Chabad, glaringly religious with a strong missionary agenda, has become the dominant force in Russian Jewish life. Its reach extends to more than 170 cities across Russia, where in many far-flung locales the community center set up by the Lubavitch emissary and his family represents the only Jewish institution in town. Lazar estimates that 90 percent of rabbis in Russia are affiliated with Chabad. On top of its religious work, Chabad sponsors hundreds of schools and social-service programs, publishes a well-respected magazine, L’Chaim, and even stages klezmer festivals. In 2012, it opened the $50-million Jewish Museum and Tolerance Center – with a sizeable donation from Russian Jewish billionaire Viktor Vekselberg – around the corner from Marina Roscha. Technologically dazzling and rooted in Russian history, the museum has become a token of Chabad’s acknowledgment of secular Jewish life.

It is easier to be Jewish in Russia

All the wars and splits notwithstanding, it is evident that—as both Putin’s supporters and detractors informed me—it has never been easier or safer to be Jewish in Russia than under his rule. In Moscow’s Marina Roshcha neighborhood, young Orthodox families throng to the kosher gourmet store, which recently opened conveniently near the small local synagogue and almost next door to the huge Chabad complex made up of a school, JCC and Jewish museum.

Though rapidly becoming something of a local Upper West Side, Marina Roshcha is only one of the capital’s 21 Jewish communities and synagogues listed in the latest issue of Moscow-Jerusalem, a free Jewish monthly. In September of this year, its glossy cover showed a pensive bearded gentleman with kippah and tzitzit, the director of a Jewish center, seated next to a red Soviet-style banner, the kind that used to proclaim the glory of the Communist Party. In the same white lettering, the banner says: “Glory to G-d!”

Glory indeed. Between glittering new synagogues and young Jews flocking services, images of Putin in a kippah attending Jewish events on state TV and the success stories of Jewish oligarchs, there is an unmistakable air of achievement among Russian Jewry today. And it is not just Chabad. Mikhail Simanovsky, who is in his late 20s, runs the Moscow Hillel from a small office in the back of a cluttered courtyard in the capital’s downtown. Hillel, he says, is thriving. Like other Jewish institutions, it suffered as a result of the crash of 2008, when funding became scarce and 11 of Russia’s 15 Hillel chapters had to close down. But just a few days before we met, four new centers opened. In Moscow, an average of 70 people come to Erev Shabbat dinner at the Hillel, but the first one this year, after the college summer break, attracted 120.

Simanovsky says the outlook for Jews is bright. “True, there is some social anti-Semitism, but there is also a growing opposite trend—Jewish is cool. People tell us we are lucky to be Jewish. This Moscow Day, we had a Hillel stand among the stands of many different organizations, and only one person of the hundreds that came to see it was unpleasant—and she was an old, obviously deranged woman.”

Putin Remarks and Support for Israel

"I am closely tracking what is happening in Israel," Russian President Vladimir Putin remarked in a meeting with a delegation of Chief Rabbis and representatives of the Rabbinical Center of Europe.

The purpose of the meeting, according to the Kremlin, was to discuss joint efforts to prevent the rewriting of history, the fight against neo-Nazism and neo-fascism, xenophobia and anti-Semitism.

"It is important to discuss the subject of the Holocaust of the World War II era. There are Holocaust survivors among the rabbis, they have their personal, dramatic stories," Rabbi Alexander Boroda, President of the Federation of Jewish Communities of Russia, told Interfax-Religion.

Boroda was seated across from Putin during the meeting, alongside Russia's Chief Rabbi Berel Lazar, Israel's Sephardic Chief Rabbi Yitzchak Yosef, TelAviv Chief Rabbi Yisrael Meir Lau and others.

At one point during the meeting, Rabbi Yosef commented that "hours before I flew here, a rocket landed near my house in Jerusalem, the capital of the Jewish nation."

"It goes without saying there is great anxiety among my children and grandchildren who were forced to enter bomb shelters, for no fault of their own," he said, adding that it is "hard to describe the emotional damage that is being done to them. All this is just for the crime that they were born to the Jewish nation."

The Chief Rabbi concluded by asking the president to use his power "to bring a stop to the violence. There cannot be a situation where people use religion to slaughter the innocent."

Most of the Israeli population is currently living under the threat of rocket fire. Life between sirens, in and out of bomb shelters, has become the daily reality for millions of Israelis.

Hamas terrorists in Gaza have fired more than 200 rockets at Israel since Operation Protective Edge began on Monday, July 7 – and over 650 rockets since the beginning of 2014.

According a news report, Putin replied by asking Rabbi Yosef to pass along a message to Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that Russia is a true friend of Israel and of the Prime Minister.

“We have to clearly realize that any attempts to review our country’s contribution to the great victory, and to deny the Holocaust – a shameful page in the world history – isn’t just a cynical and unprincipled lie, but the oblivion of lessons from history which could result in a repeat of the tragedy,” ~ Vladimir Putin.

Quotes about Putin.

"Russia has in Vladimir Putin its “most pro-Jewish leader,” whom he credits with “fighting anti-Semitism more vigorously than any Russian leader before him.” - Russia's chief rabbi, Berel Lazar.

Politicians in today’s Russia “would not risk taking anti-Semitic or a so-called anti-Zionist stand," "Any impartial observer should acknowledge Putin’s big role in this.” - Berl Lazar, Chief Rabbi of Russia.

"Putin’s pro-Jewish tendencies are part of the reason that anti-Semitic incidents are relatively rare in Russia. In 2013, the Russian Jewish Congress documented only 10 anti-Jewish attacks and acts of vandalism, compared to dozens in France". - Mikhail Chlenov, secretary general of the Euro-Asian Jewish Congress.

“Putin has facilitated the opening of synagogues and Jewish community centers across Russia, at the Jewish community’s request. This has had a profound effect on Jewish life, especially outside Moscow,” Gorin said. “He instituted annual meetings with Jewish community leaders and attends community events. His friendship with the Jewish community has given it much prestige and set the tone for local leaders.” - Gorin, a Chabad rabbi and chairman of Moscow’s Jewish Museum and Tolerance Center

Zvi Gitelman, a professor of Judaic studies at the University of Michigan who studies the relationship between ethnicity and politics in the former Soviet Union, said “Chabad, with the help of Putin, is now the dominant religious expression of Judaism in a mostly nonreligious population,” Gitelman said.

"Putin is philosemitic and has a warm feeling for Israel, though he is a pragmatist. There are quite a few Jews among his close associates and personal friends." - Yevgeny Satanovsky, member and ex-president of Russian Jewish Congress.

"Medvedev will be wonderful for the Jews, just as Putin was" - Lev Leviev, billionaire tycoon in Israel, Jewish activist and big time Zionist.

"Friendship never hurt anyone. But I have great respect for this person [Putin] and I consider that this is a person sent to our country from God." - Arkadiy Rottenberg, Jewish-Russian multi-billionaire oligarch, personal friend of Putin and his former judo training partner. His nephew now plays for an Israeli team.

"Arkady Rotenberg proves time and time again that if you know the right people the sky is indeed the limit." - Jewish Business News.

"Putin’s pro-Jewish tendencies are part of the reason that anti-Semitic incidents are relatively rare in Russia. In 2013, the Russian Jewish Congress documented only 10 anti-Jewish attacks and acts of vandalism, compared to dozens in France.""Putin is not only not anti-Semitic, he’s philo-Semitic". - Mikhail Chlenov, one of Vice Presidents of World Jewish Congress and secretary general of the Euro-Asian Jewish Congress.

"The status of Jews in Russia, is often a barometer of how Russia rulership treats its society, Putin has been better for Russian Jews than any in Russian history, and if you want evidence of that, just ask Israel." - Stephen Cohen, professor at Princeton and New York University, CBS News consultant as well as a member of the [American] Council on Foreign Relations.

"Few would dispute that Putin has been friendly to Jewish institutional life in Russia", "Putin is good for Jews" (non-verbatim, but generally implied). - Cnaan Liphshiz and Talia Lavin, Jewish Telegraphic Agency, "Putin’s Jewish embrace: Is it love or politics".

Putin assured Jewish leaders that he will continue to fight against nazism and anti-Semitism.

Originally posted by lorddreadnought at Putin assured Jewish leaders that he will continue to fight against nazism and anti-Semitism.

After Russia has annexed Crimea, Vladimir Putin assured Jewish leaders that he will fight against any new manifestations of Nazism and anti-Semitism.

He made the statement right after Russia annexed Crimea, during a meeting in Sevastopol with more than a dozen prominent rabbis, including Berel Lazar, chief rabbi of Russia, and Israeli chief rabbi Yitzchak Yosef and former chief rabbi Israel Meir Lau, as well as several rabbis from Austria, Belgium, Britain, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and France.

‘’We in Russia are very familiar with the tragedy of the Holocaust. Six million Jews were killed in the Soviet Union and Europe. At the same time, we know very well, that representatives of the Jewish people fought against Nazism in the Red Army - were political workers, and just ordinary soldiers, doctors, in general, have made a worthy contribution to the fight against Nazism,’’ Putin said.

‘’But the tragedy of the Jewish people takes, of course, a special place in the number of crimes committed by the Nazis during World War II.I repeat once again, we in Russia know about it and feel the pain like no other, because, you know, more than 20 million Soviet people, the vast majority of them Russian, were killed during the fighting against Nazism.’’

"I want to assure you that we will do everything possible to prevent the recurrence of such tragedies in the future," the Russian president added.

"We consider you, in this regard, our closest allies and ask you to consider us and as such," he also said.

During the meeting, they discussed joint efforts to prevent the 'rewriting of history': the fight against neo-Nazism and neo-fascism, as well as xenophobia and anti-Semitism.

"Of particular concern is the revival of Nazi ideas," said Putin. "I want to thank the Jewish community, non-governmental organizations that are both active and courageous; we see it in today's world - how a struggle is being uncompromisingly waged against all manifestations of the Nazi ideology and any attempts to revive it."

Putin noted that the meeting took place on the eve of the anniversary of the tragic events of July 1942, when thousands of Jews were murdered in Sevastopol.

The meeting took place ahead of an annual Holocaust commemoration event in the Crimean city. The ceremony, which is organized by the local Jewish community, is in memory of over 4,000 Jews killed by German troops in July 1942 and has been held since 1992.

"In Russia we will not only never forget these tragedies; furthermore we will always cherish the memory of the dead, and we will do everything we can to prevent a recurrence of similar tragedies in the future,” the Russian president said.

Rabbi Lazar thanked Putin for the Russian government’s focus on religious and national issues, stressing that "the organization of this meeting is the best proof of such attention."

“It is in Russia that people are genuinely concerned about the threat of neo-Nazism, Holocaust denial and revisionist approaches to World War II,” Rabbi Lazar said.

Lazar added that, “for us, it is very gratifying to see how it is in Russia, a country where the Jewish way of life was previously banned, that such a dynamic Jewish community exists now. We are grateful to the government for its support and for the fight against anti-Semitism."

Former Israeli chief rRabbi, Meir Lau thanked President Putin for his commitment to the safety of the Jewish people and shared with all the attendances a story about his childhood, about a Russian man that saved him when he was a child at the Nazi death camps.

The problems of growing anti-Semitism in Europe and throughout the world were addressed by the foreign guests, Rabbi Binyominn Jacobs, the chief interprovincial rabbi of the Netherlands and Rabbi David Moshe Lieberman.

Rabbi Binyomin Jacobs, the chief interprovincial rabbi of the Netherlands, thanked President Putin for his efforts to ensure freedom of religion in Russia, and informed him of the current campaigns the European Jewish Community is conducting in order to overturn bans against kosher slaughtering and circumcision in countries like Poland, Denmark and Norway.

Rabbi David Moshe Liberman, chief rabbi of Antwerp, stressed that he was ‘’very proud of President Putin's bold leadership and commitment to his duties as a leader.’’

Other rabbis who attended the meeting included Rabbi Menachem Margolin, director general of theRabbinical Centre of Europe, Rabbi Yisrael Yaakov Lichtenstein Rabbi of the Federation of London and Rabbi Yirmiyahu Cohen of Paris.

Putin Vows: Holocaust Will Not Be Repeated.

Originally posted by lorddreadnought at Putin Vows: Holocaust Will Not Be Repeated.

Two years ago, when Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, on a visit to Moscow, proposed the idea of a monument in Israel commemorating the sacrifices of the Red Army on behalf of Jews, President Putin promised to come to Israel for the inauguration ceremony.

On Monday, President of the Russian Federation Vladimir Putin, Israeli President Shimon Peres, Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Liberman, and Jewish leaders from around the world unveiled the brand-new Victory Monument in Netanya, Israel.

“I am very excited to be here today,” said President Putin. “We live in a fragile world and we are obligated to make sure that this dark and tragic time in history does not repeat itself. The Jewish Holocaust was the most shameful and dark event in human history, and the Soviet Army was the one who crushed the head of the Nazi monster.”

Puttin added: “This amazing monument strengthens the respect I feel towards to the Jewish people and the State of Israel… The wings in the monument are white like the wings of the dove that symbolizes peace.”

The design of the Monument was a first-ever joint initiative of Israel and Russia, conducted by a committee of members from both countries and funded by major Jewish philanthropists led by Keren Hayesod – UIA and the World Forum of Russian Jewry.

President Putin visited Israel specifically for the inauguration ceremony.

The Monument honors the millions of Red Army soldiers who perished in the war, among them 120,000 Jews.

Alexander Levin, President of the World Forum of Russian Jewry, a persistent supporters of the monument, said, “Millions of Russian Jews around the world are united at this moment in solidarity for the brave Red Army soldiers.”

More than half a million Jewish soldiers fought with the Red Army in WWII against the Nazis.

Source: http://www.jewishpress.com/news/breaking-news/putin-vows-holocaust-will-not-be-repeated/2012/06/26/

Quotes about Putin.

"Russia has in Vladimir Putin its “most pro-Jewish leader,” whom he credits with “fighting anti-Semitism more vigorously than any Russian leader before him.” - Russia's chief rabbi, Berel Lazar.

Politicians in today’s Russia “would not risk taking anti-Semitic or a so-called anti-Zionist stand," "Any impartial observer should acknowledge Putin’s big role in this.” - Berl Lazar, Chief Rabbi of Russia.

"Putin’s pro-Jewish tendencies are part of the reason that anti-Semitic incidents are relatively rare in Russia. In 2013, the Russian Jewish Congress documented only 10 anti-Jewish attacks and acts of vandalism, compared to dozens in France". - Mikhail Chlenov, secretary general of the Euro-Asian Jewish Congress.

“Putin has facilitated the opening of synagogues and Jewish community centers across Russia, at the Jewish community’s request. This has had a profound effect on Jewish life, especially outside Moscow,” Gorin said. “He instituted annual meetings with Jewish community leaders and attends community events. His friendship with the Jewish community has given it much prestige and set the tone for local leaders.” - Gorin, a Chabad rabbi and chairman of Moscow’s Jewish Museum and Tolerance Center.

Zvi Gitelman, a professor of Judaic studies at the University of Michigan who studies the relationship between ethnicity and politics in the former Soviet Union, said “Chabad, with the help of Putin, is now the dominant religious expression of Judaism in a mostly nonreligious population,” Gitelman said.

"Putin is philosemitic and has a warm feeling for Israel, though he is a pragmatist. There are quite a few Jews among his close associates and personal friends." - Yevgeny Satanovsky, member and ex-president of Russian Jewish Congress.

"Medvedev will be wonderful for the Jews, just as Putin was" - Lev Leviev, billionaire tycoon in Israel, Jewish activist and big time Zionist.

"Friendship never hurt anyone. But I have great respect for this person [Putin] and I consider that this is a person sent to our country from God." - Arkadiy Rottenberg, Jewish-Russian multi-billionaire oligarch, personal friend of Putin and his former judo training partner. His nephew now plays for an Israeli team.

"Arkady Rotenberg proves time and time again that if you know the right people the sky is indeed the limit." - Jewish Business News.

"Putin’s pro-Jewish tendencies are part of the reason that anti-Semitic incidents are relatively rare in Russia. In 2013, the Russian Jewish Congress documented only 10 anti-Jewish attacks and acts of vandalism, compared to dozens in France.""Putin is not only not anti-Semitic, he’s philo-Semitic". - Mikhail Chlenov, one of Vice Presidents of World Jewish Congress and secretary general of the Euro-Asian Jewish Congress.

"The status of Jews in Russia, is often a barometer of how Russia rulership treats its society, Putin has been better for Russian Jews than any in Russian history, and if you want evidence of that, just ask Israel." - Stephen Cohen, professor at Princeton and New York University, CBS News consultant as well as a member of the [American] Council on Foreign Relations.

"Few would dispute that Putin has been friendly to Jewish institutional life in Russia", "Putin is good for Jews" (non-verbatim, but generally implied). - Cnaan Liphshiz and Talia Lavin, Jewish Telegraphic Agency, "Putin’s Jewish embrace: Is it love or politics".

ZOG/NWO madness in Russia. Putin banned all pro-White organizations in Russia.

Originally posted by lorddreadnought at ZOG/NWO madness in Russia. Putin banned all pro-White organizations in Russia.

In 2006, the Russian parliament (controlled by Putin's party United Russia) extended the interpretation of "extremism": all pro-White / racialist speech is "extremism", can be given additional penalties as such, under Putin's laws (and this extension). The State Duma has expanded the definition of extremism in the first reading / GoogleTranslate :

The State Duma adopted in the first reading amendments to the law on "Counteracting Extremist Activities", in which the expanding definition of the term "extremism." In particular, as a manifestation of extremism invited to recognize the riots, hooliganism and vandalism, if they contribute to the excitation of hatred for ideological, political, racial, national or religious grounds, according to RIA Novosti .

In addition, extremism under the new law will treat the propaganda of exclusivity, superiority or inferiority of citizens on the basis of their attitude to religion, social status, race or ethnicity.

Article 13 of the Federal Law of 25.07.2002 № 114-FZ "On Countering Extremist Activity", paragraph 7 of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation, approved by the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of 13.10.2004 № 1313 on the Russian Ministry of Justice in charge for management, publishing, and Internet posting of the federal list of extremist materials.

Information materials of extremist federal court at the discovery, distribution or location of the organization that conducted the production of such material on the basis of the prosecutor or the production corresponding to an administrative offense, civil or criminal proceedings.
Russian law establishes liability for the mass distribution of extremist materials included in the published federal list of extremist materials, as well as their production or storage for mass distribution.

< a few snips from the large list of materials: >
1496 The brochure "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion" (decision of Lenin district court of Orenburg on 26.07.2010);
1491 A copy of the book "Rasologiya science of hereditary qualities of people" by VB Avdeev (decision Leninsky District Court of Orenburg on 26.07.2010);
1487 A copy of the book "The Truth about the Holocaust", by Mark Weber (decision Leninsky District Court of Orenburg on 26.07.2010);

In addition to banning materials, Putin's Federal Law On Countering Extremist Activities also serves as the legal basis for banning many nationalist, racialist and anti-immigration groups as well as White religious organizations that had members publicly expressing unPC views and/or publishing "extremist" materials. From Russian Ministry of Justice Website:

The list of non-profit organizations, for which the court accepted inured decision to remove or ban the activities on the grounds provided federal law "On Countering Extremist Activity"

1. Interregional Public Organization "National Bolshevik Party" (decision of the Moscow City Court of 19.04.2007 on the prohibition of the activity).

2. Religious group Krasnodar Slavic Orthodox community "Century's Office" (Vedic Culture Russian Arias) Scythian Vesey Russenia (decision of the Krasnodar Regional Court on 10.5.2006 to ban the activities).

3. Unregistered public association group "The Kuban Rada Spiritual Tribal Power Rus" (decision Pervomaisky district court in Krasnodar on the Elimination of 13.04.2006).

4. Local religious organization Asgardskaya Slavic Community Spiritual Board Asgardskoy Vesey Belovodye Old Russian Orthodox Old Believers' Church Ingliisticheskoy-Ynglings (decision of the Omsk Regional Court dated 30.04.2004 of liquidation).

5. Local religious organization Slavic Community temples of Vedas Perun Spiritual Board Asgardskoy Vesey Belovodye Old Russian Orthodox Old Believers' Church Ingliisticheskoy-Ynglings (decision of the Omsk Regional Court dated 30.04.2004 of liquidation).

6. Religious Organization Men Seminary Spiritual Foundation of professional religious education Ancient Russian Orthodox Old Believers' Church Ingliisticheskoy-Ynglings (decision of the Omsk Regional Court dated 30.04.2004 of liquidation).

7. International religious organization "Nurdzhular" (Supreme Court of the Russian Federation from 10.04.2008 to ban the activities).

8. Public association Akhtuba national movement "to Bogoderzhaviyu" (decision Achtubinskiy City Court of Astrakhan region of 17.07.2008 and against decisions in civil cases Astrakhan Regional Court on 17.09.2008).

9. International religious organization "Tablighi Jamaat" (Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of 07.05.2009).

10. Local Jehovah's Witnesses "Taganrog" (decision of the Rostov Regional Court on 11.09.2009 and against decisions on civil cases of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of 08.12.2009).

11. Ryazan city public patriotic organization "Russian National Unity" (default judgment Railway District Court of Ryazan from 12.02.2008 and the definition of the Railway District Court of Ryazan from 24.12.2009).

12. International NGO "National Socialist Society" ("VAT", "NS") (Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of 01.02.2010).

13. Group "Jamaat muvahidov" (decision of Lenin district court of the city of Astrakhan 19.10.2007).

14. "United Vilayat of Kabarda, Balkaria and Karachai" (Supreme Court of Kabardino-Balkaria on 09.07.2010).

15. Primorsky regional human rights organization "Slavic Union" (decision of Primorsky Krai Court of 28.07.2010).

16. International religious organization "Al-Takfir wal-Hijra" (Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of 15.09.2010).

17. The local organization of Krasnodar - "Pit Bull» («Pit Bull») (October decision of the district court of Krasnodar on 24.08.2010).

18. Public association "National Socialist Workers' Party of Russia" ("NSRPR") (the Trial of the Civil Division of the Nizhny Novgorod Regional Court on 22.09.2010).

19. Interregional Public Movement "Slavic Union" (the decision of the Moscow City Court on 27.04.2010).

20. Interregional public association "Format 18" (decision of the Moscow City Court on 20.12.2010).

21. Religious group "Noble Order of the Devil" (Supreme Court of the Republic of Mordovia of 27.12.2010).

22. Interregional Public Movement "The army will of the people" (decision of the Moscow City Court on 19.10.2010).

23. Local NGO "National Socialist Initiative Cherepovets" (decision Cherepovets Vologda City Court on 05.16.2011).

24. Interregional public association "Spiritual Birth Country Rus" (decision of the Moscow Regional Court on 05.04.2011 and of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of 07.12.2011).

25. Tatarstan regional branch of the All-Russian patriotic movement "Russian National Unity" (Supreme Court of the Republic of Tatarstan from 21.05.2003).

26. Religious Group O. Sokolov, Russian Vladimir Petina AG and professing, cultivating and spreading ideas of the doctrine of "Old Russian Orthodox Old Believers' Church Inglisticheskoy-Ynglings" (Maikop decision of the district court of the Republic of Adygea 12.12.2008).

27. Interregional Association "Russian All-National Union". (Vladimir Regional Court decision dated 30.05.2011 and determination of the Board on Civil Cases of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of 06.09.2011).[/b]

28. Interregional public organization "Movement Against Illegal Immigration" (decision of the Moscow City Court on 18.04.2011 and of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of 09.08.2011);

29. International association of "Blood and Honor». («Blood and Honour/Combat18», «B & H», «BandH») (the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of 05.29.2012)

This list sadly includes the most significant above-ground racialist and ethno-nationalist organizations in Russia. Movement Against Illegal Immigration aka DPNI (# 28 in the list), Russian All-National Union aka RONS (# 27 in the list) , Slavic Union (#19 in the list) were the key organizers behind the biggest annual nationalist event in Russia - the "Russian March" rally (see Russian March 2009 Stormfront thread for good video coverage).

Activists or sympathizers of organizations assigned such status, can be punished with fines or even imprisonment for organizing (or just participating in) any activities of the organization, due to these amendments to the Article 282 of criminal code:
Article 282.1. Organizing an Extremist Community

1. Creation of an extremist community, that is, of an organized group of persons for the preparation or for the performance, with the motives of the ideological, political, racial, national or religious hatred or enmity, as well as on the motives of hatred or enmity towards any one social group, of the crimes mentioned in Articles 148, 149, in the first and in the second parts of Article 213, in Articles 214, 243, 244, 280 and 282 of this Code (crimes with an extremist thrust), as well as the leadership of such an extremist community, of a part of it or of the structural subdivisions included into such community, and also setting up an association of the organizers, leaders or other representatives of the parts or of the structural subdivisions of such community for the purposes of elaboration of the plans and or the conditions for committing crimes with an extremist thrust -

- shall be punished with a fine in the amount of up to 200 thousand roubles, or in the amount of the wages or of other income of the convicted person for a period up to 18 months, or by the deprivation of the right to occupy definite posts or to engage in a definite activity for a term of up to five years, or by imprisonment for a term up to four years.

2. Participation in an extremist community -

- shall be punished with a fine in the amount up to 40 thousand roubles, or in the amount of the wages or of the other income of the convicted person for a period up to three months, or by imprisonment for a term of up to two years with the deprivation of the right to occupy specific posts or to engage in a specific kind of activity for a term of up to three years, or without any term.

Federal Law No. 73-FZ of July 21, 2004 amended the third part of Article 282.1 of the present Code

3. The actions envisaged in the first and second parts of the present Article committed by the person with the use of his official status, -

- shall be punished with a fine in the amount of 100 thousand to 300 thousand roubles, or in the amount of the wages or of other income of the convicted person for a period of one to two years, or by imprisonment for a term of up to six years with the deprivation of the right to occupy specific posts or to engage in a specific kind of activity for a term of up to three years.

Note. A person who voluntarily stops his participation in an extremist community shall be relieved of criminal liability unless a different corpus delicti is contained in his actions.

Article 282.2. Organizing the Activity of an Extremist Community

1. Organizing the activity of a public or religious association or of another organization, with respect to which the court has adopted an already enforced decision on the liquidation the prohibition of the activity in connection with the performance of an extremist activity -

- shall be punished with a fine in the amount of 100 thousand to 300 thousand roubles, or in the amount of the wages or of other income of the convicted person for a period of one to two years, or by the arrest for a term from four to six months, or by imprisonment for a term of up to three years.

2. Participation in the activity of a public or religious association or of another organization, towards which the court has adopted the already enforced decision on the liquidation or on prohibition of the activity in connection with the performance of an extremist activity, -

- shall be punished with a fine in the amount up to 200 thousand roubles, or in the amount of the wages or other income of the convicted person for a period up to 18 months, or by the arrest for a term of up to four months, or by the deprivation of freedom for a term of up to two years.

Note. A person who has voluntarily ceased participation in the activity of a public or religious association or of another organization, towards which the court has passed an already enforced decision on the liquidation or prohibition of the activity in connection with the performance of an extremist activity, shall be relieved of criminal liability, unless a different corpus delicti is contained in his activity.

Source: http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t941887

Don’t think Putin is some kind of savior, he’s in bed with the Zionists and playing their game.

Originally posted by lorddreadnought at Don’t think Putin is some kind of savior, he’s in bed with the Zionists and playing their game.

Indeed, Putin sadly appears to be rolling right over; some of his known associates in Russia are the same sect of demonic Chabad Lubavitcher Jews who insisted on the 1991 US Noahide Laws being made, which, when fully implemented, can be used to legitimize the killing of any or all non-Jews in the US, and the Lubavitchers have the intent to make those laws global.

What is next in Russia, the implementation of the Noahide Laws there also, ready to implement a new Stalinist genocide of the gentiles there? It is highly possible .

Putin has already shown what kind of a ‘hero’ he is in ‘resisting’ the evil Judaic government of America, by betraying Iran and refusing it the electronic key to use a missile system sold by it to Iran, thereby rendering it useless in the face of any potential attack by America, and Putin has done similar in Syria; rather than sticking up for Syria, Russia has refused to supply missiles to Syria also. and he has surprisingly and very sadly made a law that holocaust denial is now illegal in Russia.

Russian President Putin meets several rabbis to discuss joint efforts in battling revival of neo-Nazism and anti-Semitism

SEVASTOPOL (EJP)—Russian President Vladimir Putin assured Jewish leaders that Russia will fight against any new manifestations of Nazism and anti-Semitism.

He made the statement on Wednesday during a meeting in Sevastopol with more than a dozen prominent rabbis, including Berel Lazar, chief rabbi of Russia, and Israeli chief rabbi Yitzchak Yosef and former chief rabbi Israel Meir Lau, as well as several rabbis from Austria, Belgium, Britain, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and France.

‘’We in Russia are very familiar with the tragedy of the Holocaust. Six million Jews were killed in the Soviet Union and Europe. At the same time, we know very well, that representatives of the Jewish people fought against Nazism in the Red Army – were political workers, and just ordinary soldiers, doctors, in general, have made a worthy contribution to the fight against Nazism,’’ Putin said.

‘’But the tragedy of the Jewish people takes, of course, a special place in the number of crimes committed by the Nazis during World War II.I repeat once again, we in Russia know about it and feel the pain like no other,because, you know, more than 20 million Soviet people, the vast majority of them Russian, were killed during the fighting against Nazism.’’

“I want to assure you that we will do everything possible to prevent the recurrence of such tragedies in the future,” the Russian president added.

“We consider you, in this regard, our closest allies and ask you to consider us and as such,” he also said.

He has no problem (and a clear agenda) in telling everyone how those “evil EUROPEAN Americans” have a long history of mass-murdering everyone from Indians to the Japanese (while “holding the poor Black man down”), and he points out that Stalin (‘as bad as he was’) would still not have used nuclear weapons against Germans (even though he had no problem being a Jew-puppet while 10’s of millions of Russians were murdered), but (of course) no mention of the Jews, who he most certainly knows were behind the scenes orchestrating it all.

He’s on board with the “blame Whitey” game just as much as any Jew. He is projecting Jewish crimes onto his fellow Whites, as he plays his role in setting up the next (brothers) war. In what is clearly the Jewish M.O. of drawing lines between us, engaging in heavy propaganda on both sides (to further drive the wedge), and making their next war appear “justified”, against the “bad guys” on the “other side”.

IF he was “secretly working for us” and “against the Jews”, then why would he push their anti-White propaganda and feed into the type of division that justifies brother wars? Why would he project Jewish crimes onto his fellow Whites (many of whom are RUSSIAN -by blood- Americans -by mere birth, no less)? And once more, why no mention of the Jews?

To be clear: It’s one thing to “fail” to mention the Jews by name or deed(I guess you could excuse such a thing by claiming that he is “secretly plotting against them” and just “waiting for his moment to strike”), but it’s another to actively parrot their propaganda, push their (anti-White) agenda (this division between Whites based on our passports), and go so far as to project Jewish crimes onto White Americans.

Nothing to see here folks, I’m just “hating on” the “messiah” Putin for “nothing” (I must be a “Jewish shill”):

With some people, no amount of facts will ever wake them up. That goes for otherwise Jew-wise Putin worshipers as well. False hope is a powerful emotion and it’s tough to overcome. They’ll swear he is our “savior” no matter how much evidence is offered to prove he is anything BUT, then they’ll label anyone who dares call their “messiah” into question a “hater”, a “troll”, or even a Jew. Go figure...

Putin's regime exposed. The open letter to Putin from the Russian nationalist.

Originally posted by lorddreadnought at Putin's regime exposed. The open letter to Putin from the Russian nationalist.

My Russian soul, my Russian spirit, my Russian blood through which everyone русич feels a unification with the people, responsibility for its destiny and pain for his sufferings.

Naturally, in view of absence at all of you above-mentioned qualities, to you not to understand it. But it and is unimportant. Not your understanding I want to find this letter, on it would be to count, at least, strange. I only want to ask you questions which you will never hear in the dramatized statements under the name "hotline with Vladimir Putin". Each Russian person whom you and your owners hurried to give fat up as a bad job would like to ask you these questions and to write-off. And it is necessary to answer them to you sooner or later. Be sure, you will answer everything and for everything!
So, questions!

Tell when in 1999 the family, in the person of Dyachenko, Yumashev, Voloshin and Deripaska chose you as the project manager "Utilization of Russia" as the Russian President, what you thus felt? Pleasure from career prospects or shame before the devoted Homeland?

Tell when after a series of explosions of houses in September, 1999, the staff of FSB unexpectedly made a mistake and were caught red-handed on attempt of blasting the next house in Ryazan on September 23, you were frightened of what the people will guess your role in these acts of terrorism or you were sure of the impunity? Whether you felt sorry for innocent people whom you blew up sleeping in the houses?

Tell after in August, 2000, the nuclear submarine "Kursk" which doesn't have analogs in the world was torpedoed by the American submarine "Memphis", and you, with eyes full of fear and the shivering lips murmured something unintelligible before journalists of that you were afraid then most of all? Deteriorations of the relations with the USA or what the country learns about your inability (unwillingness) to protect own people? After you deliberately tightened rescue efforts, dooming on the death of our submariners that they couldn't tell the world about real causes of the tragedy in the Barents Sea, then it wasn't a shame to you to look in the face them to relatives?

In 2001 you, at the request of Americans, closed both of our prospecting centers in Cuba and in Vietnam thanks to which we received to 70% of prospecting information. You explained this step with economy of means on which it is possible to build houses. Tell, whether it was much constructed houses for the Russian people on the saved money? How many specifically Russian families received from the state free housing for this term?

At the request of the same Americans in March, 2001 you lower the Mir Space Station giving to 30% of all prospecting information on a bottom of the Pacific Ocean. Thus, we finally lost foreign intelligence and independent development of domestic astronautics. Official same reason: lack of money for its contents and modernization. And it is concrete – 70 million dollars which at Russia wasn't.

Really, there are much more important projects for which it is possible to spend money, than rescue of some space station. For example, purchase and the contents by the governor of Chukotka Abramovich of football club "Chelsea" for total amount more than 1 billion, rolled out from Russia of dollars or allocation of 1,4 billion dollars to Telman Izmailov on construction of hotel in Turkey, isn't it, Vladimir Vladimirovich? And it without 1 billion dollars which were offered by China if only we preserved "Peace".

Tell, for what purpose you in 2005 sold to China primordially Russian lands – islands "Tarabarov" and "Big Ussuriisk" on Amur River, and also the island "Big" on the Argun River in the Chita region, total in total 367 sq.km of our territory? Who to you granted the right to dispose at discretion of what our ancestors mastered and protected throughout centuries?

Explain how so it turned out, what after the announcement you the fighter against oligarchs, the number of dollar billionaires increased in Russia many times, and on this indicator we came out on top in Europe? Besides that your private means, according to researches of famous political scientists, already exceeded 40(!) billion dollars. And it against a general impoverishment of the population when more than a half of Russians aren't able to afford the most necessary.

During your board mortality of the population of Russia and in particular its Russian part reached the fantastic sizes. According to the Central Analytical Center Russian Federation of department of the REGISTRY OFFICE for June 1, 2010 in the Russian Federation according to documents is registered the living population only 89 654 325 (!!!) the person, but not 142 000 000 as it is declared officially in population census. For 2009 5 000 854 persons died. During the period 4 678 856 people died from January 1, 2010 to June 1, 2010. The fact of criminal concealment of killing of people, terrible on scales, indicates deliberate creation by you, mister Putin, such vital conditions in the country which are calculated on full physical destruction of the population of Russia. Situation can be estimated only as catastrophic, especially concerning the state-building people – Russians which quantity decreases already in a geometrical progression.

Fantastic level of reduction of the population of the country (on 5 million inhabitants annually) – the main outcome of your ten years' war with the Russian people. Such rates of our destruction, the Russian nation completely will disappear from the face of the earth already at most in 10-20 years!

Promptly becoming empty Russian lands you occupy natives of Asia and the Caucasus, thereby provoking the international conflicts and pursuing policy of "soft" genocide of the Russian population with replacement it from the primordial fatherlike earth and replacement with alien ethnoses. I won't ask you, why you do it, and I will ask only one: whether still the earth under feet from feeling of own ublyudochnost burns at you? Isn't present? Anything, will sunbathe soon. Soon!

You explain the actions for involvement of migrants to that to our growing economy not to do without additional labor since the population isn't enough for a long time. Tell, mister Putin, and on a horse-radish to us this was given your growing economy, at catastrophically endangered people? You for whom develop economy? Tomorrow us already will survive nobody, and all of you think of money. Well, we die out now poor and hungry, and that we will die out in cash and full (if to assume that the growing economy somehow will affect welfare of simple toilers). And what? How long you will dupe us about the GDP record level and about the increasing purchasing power of the population, thus modestly holding back total genocide of this population?

On May 23, 2007 you, mister Putin, signed the contract No. 410940-4 with NATO that in case of national disorders and technogenic catastrophes of army of NATO can occupy freely the territory of Russia and perform on it military operations. Tell, for protection against whom you signed this treacherous document? Really you and the truth think, what at approach of national disorders (and they surely will come and already soon) when the Russian people brought to despair start overthrowing occupational antinational zhido-democratic regime, your transatlantic heads will be able to help you? You are mistaken because at this time in America and in Europe there will be the same.

The power of kikes and the Jewish capital bored already whole world! Your allies in war against the Russian people – wild Caucasians with whom you strenuously form law-enforcement bodies won't help to keep to your criminal mode even, relying on the old principle: you want devoted employees who won't tremble, having received the order to shoot on defeat – approach people without complexes of "love to the people". Be sure, during the Russian revolt, prompt and ruthless, Caucasians the first and will betray you. Such at them animal parasitic breed – to betray the weakened allies and to wag a tail before winners.

From the moment of your coming to power alcohol consumption sharply increased. Consumption of beer increases annually by 60% that is blow to a nation gene pool. Thanks to it, today 60% (!!!) guys of military age aren't capable to a detoproizvodstvo. Tell, you know, what the hop which is used for beer production, contains substance – a tarragon, similar on the chemical properties with estrageoly – a female sexual hormone which, at the systematic use, leads to infertility? It is sure that is known, differently there would be at us no such aggressive advertizing of beer, its promotion among youth and support of breweries at the state level. Isn't it Vladimir Vladimirovich?

At the last meeting of the State Council in 2010, you together with Medvedev put forward idea about creation of "the Russian nation" and "the all-Russian patriotism". Tell, it everything, what you managed to gain as national idea in ten years of the stay at a feeding trough of the power? You know, your eagerness and sense of duty before the kagalny owners can only envy. Yours energy and on protection of the Russian people, the price to you wouldn't be! But your excessive activity will also ruin you. You so hurry to close finally the Russian question, pursuing frank policy of an iznichtozheniye of the Russian nation that absolutely forgot about conspiracy.

You that think, what the Russian people so brainless cattle, what it doesn't understand against whom the "Russian nation" project is ground? Its anti-Russian orientation is so obvious that simply strikes with the cynicism. The small people of Russia having the national and state educations are protected from this project of a melting copper. They will remain Tatars, Kalmyks, Yakuts... So-called "Russians", such imperial cosmopolitans of humble origin you plan to do only of Russians. The child understands it even.

You are so obsessed in the Russophobic activity, and so you are afraid of the Russian national consciousness which is promptly arising in the people that didn't think up anything the best how to declare fight against Russian, and only against Russian, nationalism (nationalism – love to the nation, the nationalist – the one who loves the nation) the main direction of domestic policy. Not without reason in 2008 the department of fight against organized crime (OBOP) was liquidated, and on its base the department of fight against extremism is created (Center E). So that's that. Probably, isn't present for you and your owners it is more terrible and more dangerous than criminals in the country, than the Russian nationalists.

Tell why today on Russian soil the most deprived of civil rights, the most poor, most unfortunate and oppressed people are state-building Russian people? The yes, restrained provision of the Russian nation is a centuries-old basic paradigm of the Russian statehood, starting with the first Romanov. Both at tsars, and at communists, and at democrats fight against "great-power Russian chauvinism" was and is a distinctive feature of the russkonenavistnichesky occupational power. But you, mister Putin, surpassed all of them, together taken! Such sophisticated genocide which you suited to one of the greatest people on its native earth, the world history didn't know! How long you will play with the Russian long-suffering? Ripen, bulk up, ready to break blood, clusters of people's wrath …

At the expense of the ruined Russian regions there are funds for "restoration" of Chechnya and South Ossetia, for swindle with the Olympic Games in Sochi, the FIFA World Cup, etc., etc. On each inhabitant of the parasitic North Caucasian national region from the budget about 50 thousand rubles, and are allocated for the inhabitant of the Russian area – 5 thousand, 10 (!) times less. And, of course, settling of a sredneaziatama and Caucasians of primordially Russian territories of the European Russia proceeds. Besides that Siberia and the Far East are handed completely over on a payoff to foreigners, generally Chinese.

Tell, mister Putin when you together with Medvedev, military "reforms" deprived the Russian Armed Forces of fighting capacity, you did it for what? That the disarmed and reduced army couldn't show resistance to alleged military capture of Russia or that it didn't become a kernel of organized mass resistance against your cannibal power?
In parallel with disorder of army, your government practically already destroyed domestic education and science. You turned one of the systems of training and training of specialists, best in the world, into the ground on anti-humane experiments. And not simply to experiments. It is easy to track a tendency according to which, at us in the country with maniacal persistence those take root "educational innovations" which already showed the productivity in the Western world in business … to the population debilization. During your board, you, mister Putin, managed finally to destroy everything that supported our status as great scientific and industrial nation, thus having constructed nothing in exchange.

Results of your activity of an ustrashayushcha: demographic accident, disorder of the industry and agriculture, sharp decrease in defensive potential, wear of infrastructure and industrial equipment, degradation of the social sphere, moral decline. Enormous enrichment of the superthin parasitic layer (70% of the Russian capital belongs to the Jewish business) which is pumping over richness of Russia into the foreign accounts and not having in our country of long-term interests. GDP thus can grow, and the mass of the people starves and dies out. The cold, hunger, poverty, diseases, unemployment, a hopelessness sent and reduce to the grave millions of our fellow citizens.

Hatred and contempt for you of all Russian people simply knows no limit. From your self-satisfied physiognomy of each decent person already simply feels sick. Any person who itself personally or his acquaintances and relatives would vote for you or for your defective party "Eating Russia" isn't familiar to me. In this regard question: from where voices (to 70%), Vladimir Vladimirovich? When you in Russia not that the president, in live anybody doesn't want to see! You won't tell secret? Whether those 50 million dead souls whom every hour more and more, make skeleton of your "voters"?

Probably, therefore you so safely declared that you are going to go in presidents in 2012. Judging by your ostentatious self-confidence, results of elections don't interest you at all, time you declare yourself future president in advance. Forgive, and what you actually for a bush from the mountain such, what, without having asked opinion of the people, you decide to become at the head of the huge country?

I remind that you – only the pawn put on a playing field, and the same hand that were put, after performance of your mission – destruction of the Russian nation, will be also carelessly from it a smakhnuta as the fulfilled material. But don't worry, it won't occur. Much earlier you will be distraught a wave of promptly reviving Russian nation!
Your so-called "power" and "power" of your consanguineous cut-off owners with their drawn candy wrappers, exists only because we recognize it when you have no rights for the power and can't be by definition. All your invented power, all your artificial financial superiority over us exists only in the heads of the deceived people. As soon as the critical mass of the population understands a true state of affairs and will cease to recognize your power over itself – your imaginary power will thaw, as a smoke! That time is close, oh is close!

Personally I, mister Putin, don't recognize your power over myself in no shape or form. You for me anybody, the complete nonentity, as well as for millions of other Russian people! I spit on your zhido-democratic laws, I spit on you personally, I despise and I hate you immensely all the Russian heart! I am not afraid of your imaginary greatness and is ready to say of you all above-mentioned straight to the face.

For that you made and continue to do against, the Russian people which trusted in you, won't be to you forgiveness in eyelids eternal! You will surely be responsible for everything, will cruelly answer!

For each not been born Russian child; for each Russian officer brought to suicide; for each killed of the Russian guy and the raped Russian girl visitors from the Caucasus and Central Asia; for each Russian scientist who went to work abroad; for each meter of the Russian land sold to foreigners; for each street child; for each ruble allocated for the maintenance of murderers and tyrants in prisons; for each Russian child given on adoption to foreigners; for each custom-made abortion which is taken out to America for sale.

For each addict, the alcoholic and the prostitute who couldn't become an engineer, the military or mother having many children; for each kike oligarch living at the expense of a robbery of the Russian people; for each starving toiler, for each Russian unemployed; for each foreigner delivered to the country; for each ruble which is rolled out from the country; for each dead from a hopelessness of the Russian person; for each hidden and obvious promotion in mass media of sexual dissoluteness, a paederasty, russophobia, a zhidopoklonstvo, shkurnichestvo, alcoholism, drug addiction, prostitution, tolerance, cosmopolitism, zhido-Christianity and other western "multicultural values".

For each corrupted Russian child, for each broken Russian destiny; for each Russian guy sitting under the invented extremist article; for each cop and the official gathering the Russian people; for each Russian person left to the mercy of fate living in the countries of the former Union; for each killed your actions of a rusich, and such already tens of millions; for each your lie.

For each your treachery, for all this and many other things you will be responsible wholly. Be sure of it. The Russian national revival approaches …

The author – Yury Averyanov.

Orwellian totalitarian laws are seemingly in a never ending state of expansion in Putin’s Russia.

Originally posted by lorddreadnought at Orwellian totalitarian laws are seemingly in a never ending state of expansion in Putin’s Russia.

Legal obstacles to free speech and White rights in Russia. Putin's personal legislative activism in the area.

Another article about the same or similar developments (it's hard to say, because these): Russia stretches 'extremism' laws. Thanks to these laws, virtually everything including breathing too loud can be "extremist". Kremlin-controlled forces are glad to offer clarification about what these laws are intended to terrorize - Oleg Morozov, deputy speaker of the Duma, from the pro-Kremlin United Russia Party: "We need to establish zero tolerance in our society for xenophobia, nationalism, and extremism in all its forms."

A new legislation was supported by Jewish activists and Putin's Party United Russia, and has been signed into law by Putin in late 2012, that sets the legal basis for banning almost any pro-White / pagan symbols (and organizations that use them), as well as potentially any unPC information on NS, WW2, revisionism etc: "Nazi propaganda" banned in Russia. In reality, as expected, it went above and beyond "Nazi". Another thread about this development, its originator and consequences: Total ban of white symbols in Russia - Stormfront.

Somewhere along the line, one arm of Russian government has created an official list of "terrorists and extremists": Russia now has an Orwellian Nonperson ("extremist") List. Get blacklisted forever for an ethnic/racial slur - Stormfront (see the thread for examples of how this affects nationalist activists and accidental thought criminals). According to this RT article, "Since June 30 (of 2011), all defendants who stand trial on charges of terrorism and extremism will now also be included on the list." I have not yet identified the specific bill or decree that mandated this change in 2011. It might have been any of the countless anti-extremist legislation produced in a constant stream by putinism. What is important, is that cases take years one way or another, so even if the defendant miraculously obtains a non-guilty verdict in the end, RF government has a legal instrument to "economically torment" and destroy the livelihood of the hundreds of thought criminals, for years, with complete impunity (details in the thread). According to documents on the official website, the legal basis is, naturally, Putin's laws and decrees. One of them, from as early as 2001, already includes wording about "extremists" (i.e. thought criminals).

In 2013, Putin supported penalizing mentions of race and ethnicity of criminals, so that Whites can not get information about real effects of immigration and "multiculturalism": Ban on mentioning nationality of criminals in Russia (no power of law yet, status unknown).

In December 2013, Putin's and Medvedev's perennial drive for more repression against thought criminals was answered by a new bill: Russia: penalties for thought crimes increased in 2013. According to the press (see the linked thread for details), Putin's been confirmed by officials as backer of this change. The bill was promptly rubber-stamped by Putin loyalist -controlled RF parliament and is scheduled to become law somewhere in the first half of 2014. It contains amendments for a number of criminal and administrative law articles to make life much worse for those evil "thought criminals".

In 2013, Putin's regime is actively working on censoring the internet (last refuge of unPC in Russia) as per Putin's requests for "barrier to extremism propaganda in Internet": Russia's FSB mulls ban on Tor online anonymity network & more. <-- Other news in this thread: bots to police the internet against "extremist" thought crimes, FSB will have access to the correspondence of Gmail users, and Yahoo, total internet surveillance in Russia. In the same vein, in December 2013 they passed another putinism-inspired bill - Russian prosecutors will block "extremist" (i.e. racial, nationalist etc) websites without warrant - Stormfront. Naturally, it was backed, endorsed and signed ASAP by Putin and is also en route to becoming law in 2014.

Also late in 2013 Putin has decided the already enormous breadth of thought crime legislation is not wide enough yet, and has proposed to criminalize "separatist incitement". The controlled parliament quickly obliged, and it's expected to become law by May 2014 : Russian Duma makes discussion of separatism / "threatening territorial integrity" a thought crime - Stormfront. This will close one of the few remaining loopholes for nationalists & racialists: the ability to speak about any separation at all, even without "supremacism" or violence (most of the talk about racial or ethnic differences is already criminalized as per official definition of "extremism" already given in this post). Bill designers officially targeted White separatists and WNs rioting against migrant & Muslim criminality.

In 2014, bigshots from Putin's United Russia has finally pushed through the parliament their bill to outlaw skepticism of Nuremberg trials and historical dogmas (aka "Holocaust denial" and "defiling the military glory and accomplishments of USSR"). Shortly after, on May 5, 2014, Putin signed a law punishing Holocaust & Nuremberg Trials scepticism with up to 5 years - Stormfront.

Source of the text: http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t941887/

Can black people sustain Western civilization?

Originally posted by lorddreadnought at Can black people sustain Western civilization?

Today, the liberal Left bombards America with pro-Black propaganda. The post modernists have been letting huge numbers of Black African immigrants into the country.

Multiculturalists expect us to believe that these strange brown people dressed like medieval jesters are the future of our magnanimous Western civilization. 

As citizens concerned for the future of our communities and the safety of our posterity the question should be asked: can Blacks sustain White Western society with all its complex institutions and cultural expressions?

Christians should not stand idly by and accept the destruction of our faith's civilization; as it would benefit neither the world nor Christ's followers. Christians must ask tough questions.

For anyone willing to look, there is a massive amount of data upon which to construct answers.

Evaluating the history of the now ruined city of Detroit, the now ruined continent of Africa, and the now ruined island of Haiti while comparing them with Japan and Puerto Rico should give anyone the evidence they need to decide upon the ability of Blacks to sustain White civilization.

One might wonder what Japan has to do with Black people. The Japanese serve as a useful contrast to the low intelligence of the Black race.

Even though American Blacks are still undeveloped 500 years after being introduced to civilized society, and Africa is still savage and chaotic even after being nurtured and instructed by the White man for over 150 years, the Japanese essentially recreated a version of Western civilization on their small island in the time between first contact with the West and the era when the West could have conquered and colonized them.

The Portuguese had conducted trade with the Black Africans for slaves since the 16th century. These Africans, however, never developed technologies or learned anything from the superior Europeans. Africans remain in the most primitive state of man until this present day.

In 1854 American Commodore Matthew Perry anchored his armored battleship off the coast of Japan and forced the Japanese to accept trade with the Americans.

Upon seeing the mammoth warship the Japanese realized they were in trouble. They understood that if they didn’t modernize rapidly they would quickly be dominated by the superior Americans.

Unlike the barbarian Blacks, who never had any idea of developing in pace with the Europeans, the Japanese (who possess an average IQ equal to that of Whites) rapidly modernized to the point that only 50 years later they were capable of defeating the Russian Empire in the Russo-Japanese War and establishing themselves as a kind of colonial power in the Far East. They did all of this modernization despite few natural resources and a small geographical land area.

Perhaps someone will argue that Africa is poor because of bad geography, perhaps someone will argue that Detroit is ruined because of some kind of American racism. The same arguments cannot be used for Haiti.

Haiti is considered a 'failed state' by the Fund for Peace (FFP).

Haiti has the highest percentage of Black people in the Western Hemisphere – it is also the poorest country in the Western Hemisphere.


I think not.

No one can blame climate/geography for Haiti’s failures as the island sits right next to Puerto Rico, the most developed and richest country in all of Latin America.

Puerto Rico is the Caribbean’s wealthiest country. Does it come as a surprise to anyone that it also has the Caribbean’s Whitest population (White Haitians: 1-3%, White Puerto Ricans:76.2%)?

Although Wikipedia is not always reliant the online encyclopedia opens its article on the Economy of Puerto Rico:

‘Despite its relatively small geographical area and limited availability of natural resources, Puerto Rico's productivity is exceptionally high, having the highest nominal GDP per capita in Latin America,’

I quote Wikipedia not because I get my information from that source, but to demonstrate that anyone can go online and research this data for themselves.

Haiti’s population is 3 times larger than that of Puerto Rico’s. Haiti’s has 3 times the land area of Puerto Rico.

Why, then, is Haiti’s total economic output less than 1/11th that of Puerto Rico’s!?

Another argument used to excuse Africa’s poverty is that Black countries were under colonial rule up until the 1960s. If Whites had granted independence to Black countries earlier on they would be better off today… so the argument goes.

But Haiti has been independent from colonial rule for 212 years. Puerto Rico has been free for 0 years!

To this very day Puerto Rico is still ruled by a colonial power (United States), and yet it is light-years ahead of Haiti.

One last note on Haiti, Haiti is a perfect example of how Marxist economics can’t be blamed for the failure of Black societies. Haiti has embraced the free market to such an extent that leftists routinely blame the countries poverty on capitalism. The country remains in impoverished shambles.

No historical truth is more certain than that the Black race is incapable of sustaining civilization.

Only racially superior peoples, like Japanese and Whites, are capable of sustaining what we now know as Western Civilization. Blacks will hopelessly continue to recreate the heart of darkness as they have since time immemorial.

Source: http://www.christianityandrace.org/p/can-blacks-sustain-civilization.html

Russian intellectuals, scholars, academics and politicians expose Putin's Jewish Supremacism.

Originally posted by lorddreadnought at Russian intellectuals, scholars, academics and politicians expose Putin's Jewish Supremacism.

500 Russian “intellectuals, academics, newspaper editors and 19 Duma members” posted what amounts to an “open letter” to the Russian government protesting “outlaw” Jewish supremacist and secular organizations for subversive activities in Russia.

Representatives of Russian society demand from the Procurator General of the Russian Federation the suppression of illegal propagation of Jewish national and religious extremism.

Dear Mr. Procurator General:
On 18 December 2003 the President of the Russian Federation, Vladimir V. Putin, brought up the following statistics in the course of a televised address: in 1999 there were four convictions under article 282 of the Russian Federation Criminal Code on inciting inter-ethnic hatred. In 2000 there were 10. And in 2003 “more than 60 criminal investigations were made into cases of inciting inter-ethnic discord. Of these, 20 cases went to court and guilty verdicts were handed down in 17-20 cases.” (President’s live television dialogue with the Russian people, 18 December 2003, excerpts available at:

The overwhelming majority of these cases are initiated by Jewish activists or organizations, who charge their defendants with the “anti-Semitism.” But the overwhelming majority of those accused and convicted are Russian patriots. Now they have been joined by the well-known independent politician and pamphleteer, the former head of Goskompechat’ (the State Publishing Commission) B. S. Mironov.

We recognize that the statements of Russian patriots regarding Jews frequently have a sharply negative and excessively emotional character, unacceptable in public discussion, and constitute what the law regards as extremism. None of the above-mentioned trials, however, ever examined the reason for this sharpness, the original source of this extremism in the given inter-ethnic conflict.

Indeed the chief problem that must be elucidated in investigations and trials is: do the sharply negative assessments of the Jews by Russian patriots correspond in essence to the truth about the Jews (against whom they are directed) or do they not? If they do not correspond to the truth about the Jews, then the discussion can deal with the defamation of Jews and with the incitement of religious and inter-ethnic discord. But if they do correspond to the truth, then such assessments, apart from and independent of their emotionalism, cannot be qualified as defamatory, as incitement to discord, and the like. (For example, to say a decent person is a criminal is defamatory to him; but to name someone who has committed a crime a criminal – this is a truthful statement of facts.)
Furthermore, since there are two sides in this inter-ethnic conflict (the accuser and the accused), it follows that one must clear up: which of the sides actually started this conflict in the first place and was responsible for it, and whether the actions of the accused might not be acts of self-defense in response to acts of aggression by the accusing side?

We ask you to verify, Mr. Procurator General, that on these matters there is a large quantity of universally recognized facts and sources from around the world, on the basis of which it is possible to draw the indisputable conclusion that: the Russian patriots’ negative assessments of typical Jewish qualities and actions with respect to non-Jews correspond to truth; it being known that these actions are not chance occurrences, but are prescribed in Judaism and have been practiced for two millenia. Thus, the incriminating statements and publications made by patriots against the Jews constitute self-defense, which may not always be correct in terms of style, but remains nevertheless justified in essence.

The Morality of Jewish Fascism.

To corroborate this, we draw your attention to the book Kitsur Shulkhan Arukh officially published in Moscow in 2001 by the Congress of Jewish Religious Organizations and Associations in Russia (KEROOR). This is a condensed version of the Jewish law code, the Sulkhan Arukh, compiled several centuries ago on the basis of the Talmud and required in practice to this day. In the introduction to the book the head of KEROOR, Rabbi Zinoviy Kogan makes the frank acknowledgement (the italics are ours) that:
“The editorial council of KEROOR considered it necessary in this translation to omit some instructions of the halakha [Jewish law] . . . whose inclusion in the publication in the Russian language would be perceived by the population of Russia, which does not adhere to Judaism, as an unprovoked insult. The reader who wishes to read the Kitsur Shulkhan Arukh in the ideally complete volume, is invited to come to a yeshiva in order to study this and many other holy books in the original.”

That is, one of the leaders of Russian Jewry himself recognized that some regulations of the Judaic code of behavior were insulting to the non-Jewish population of Russia, but considers it possible to invite his fellow tribesmen to yeshivas – the Jewish schools, which are financed from the state and local budgets – to study these insults. Yet, even in this expurgated publication we find the following provisions:
-In the “Laws about the idolatry” it is stated that “it is forbidden to use the figure of two crossed sticks, which they worship.” That is to say, Christianity is considered a variety of idolatry and all regulations regarding relations with idolaters (“akum”) imply in Russia (a country where the Orthodox religion predominates), first of all, the orthodox Christians (page. 389).

-The instruction on seeing a “house of idolatry” (i.e., place of worship) is to pronounce this curse upon it: “G-d will uproot the house of the proud,” and at the sight of a destroyed temple one is to exclaim: “The G-d of retribution has appeared!” Moreover, this opinion on the instruction is also advanced: “some maintain that this pertains to the houses of the non-Jews, who live in the world, calm and wealthy” (pp. 389-390).
-Non-Jews are equated with excrement. (pp. 47 and 48).
-It is prohibited to train non-Jews in a craft. (p. 390).
-“The Jewess ought not to help non-Jews with childbirth.” (p. 390).
-“If a man took a loan from a non-Jew who then died, the man has the right to refuse to pay back the loan to the deceased’s son, who does not know accurately whether or not this Jew was in debt to his father.” (p. 405).
-In money calculations “If a non-Jew made a mistake against himself, it is permitted to use his error.” (p. 406).

– “It is forbidden to betray Jew into the hands of a non-Jew, whether the matter has to do with the Jew’s life or his property; and it does not matter whether this is done by some action or by words; and it is forbidden to report him or to point out the places where he has hidden his property.” (p. 408) – we imperatively request that it be noted that this concerns the behavior prescribed for Jews in the context of investigations and trials.
Of course, among the thirteen major principles of Judaism is the requirement that they must await a Jewish world ruler who will appoint Jews to rule above other peoples of the world: “Unconditionally do I believe in the arrival of the mashiakh [messiah], and, although his coming may be delayed, nevertheless each day I will await him.” (p. 485). –
In the teachings of the Orthodox Church this expected ruler of the world is identified with the antichrist, about whom Jesus Christ warned (John 5:43), as did the Apostle Paul (2 Thess. 2), and the holy fathers of the Church. This is an important and integral part of Orthodox teachings.

In the introduction to this book the head of KEROOR writes that “the Talmud is the unsurpassed monument of Jewish genius,” and this distillation of its morality, “the Kitsur Sulkhan Arukh is the anthology of the Jewish civilization of our time. . . . This book is completely necessary for you. You can act in the manner that it prescribes and be confident that you have carried out the will of the Ex-lted.”

And the Chief Rabbi of Russia, Adolf Shayevich, notes in the preface: “Interest in this book exceeded our most daring expectations. A huge quantity of grateful responses from the most different people has continued all this time to come in to our address. An even larger quantity of letters contain imperative requests for help in acquiring this publication.”

We would suppose that already on the basis of this one official Jewish publication the law-enforcement agencies should, in accordance with article 282 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, suppress the propagation of a religion that kindles hatred among the Jews for the rest of the “population of Russia.” All the more, if we take a glance at “the ideally complete volume of the unsurpassed monument of Judaic morals” – the Shulkhan Arukh, that is studied in the yeshivas.

We will use translations of it from the Amsterdam Judaic publication, made by a judicial expert, the Hebrew scholar Dr. K. Ecker, for the court trial in Germany in 1883 (Dr. K Ecker. Der “Judenspiegel” im Lichte der Wahrheit, eine wissentschaftliche Untersuchung. Paderborn. 1884; Russian translation: Dr. K. Ekker. Yevreyskoe zertsalo v svete istiny. Nauchnoe issledovanie. Moskva, 1906).

This legal case was brought to court by Jews who were upset because one of their tribesmen, Justus Brieman, converted to Christianity and published the anti-human laws of the Shulkhan Arukh and of the Talmud. The law court ruled that the man who published the work was in the right, after finding that his translation corresponded to the original text. Dr. Ekker only corrected small inaccuracies. We will cite below characteristic extracts from the text as corrected by him, together with the references to specific Jewish sources (drawing confidence from both the qualifications of the German Hebrew scholar and the authority of the German law court).

-“His [the non-Jew’s] seed is considered like the seed of cattle” (Tosefta – an addition to the Talmud. Ketubot, 3 b). “For [dead] servants and maids . . . words of comfort should not be said to their relatives, but it is necessary to say to him [the Jewish master]: ‘may God compensate you for your loss’, just as one says to a man whose bull or donkey has died.” (Iore de’a 377-1).

-“It is forbidden to save them [non-Jews, akums] when they are close to death. For example, when you see that one of them has fallen into the sea, do not rescue him, even if he wants to pay. . . . It is permitted to test medicine on an akum to see whether or not it is effective.” (Iore de’a 158-1).

-“The money of akums is essentially like goods with no owner, and the one who arrives first may take possession of them.” “With respect to an akum there is no fraud.” (Khoshen ha-mishpat 156-5, Khaga; 227-26; 348-2, Khaga).

-“When a Jew has robbed an akum and they force him [the Jew] to take an oath., then he must in his heart proclaim his oath invalid, because he has been forced to take it.” (Iore de’a 329-1, Khaga). Note: this again concerns the behavior of Jews during investigations and trials!

-“When it has been established about someone that he has betrayed a Jew or his money three times to an akum, then it is necessary to seek out ways and means to squeeze him out of the world.” “As to expenditures needed for squeezing a traitor from the world, all the inhabitants of a locality are obliged to contribute.” (Khoshen ha-mishpat 388-15 and -16).

-“It is permitted to kill a traitor in any place, even in our time. It is permissible to kill him early, before he manages to make a denunciation [powerful enough to cause ‘bodily or monetary loss, no matter how small’] . . . and everyone who is the first to kill acquires merit.” (Khoshen ha-mishpat 388-10).

-“The Jew-free-thinker, i.e., he who carries out the divine service of akums . . . to kill all such people is a good deed. When there is authority to kill them publicly by the sword, then let this be carried out; but if there is not, then they must be entangled in every way possible in order to cause to them death. For example, when you see that one of them has fallen into a well and in the well there is a ladder, then hurry to take out it, saying: ‘I have a major concern; I need to get my son down from the roof, and I will bring it right back to you,’ or something like that.” (Khoshen ha-mishpat 425-5).

Provocateurs and Haters of Humanity

It should be noted that even the last prescriptions for killing – are to this day is not only theory, but also practice. Thus, the former chairman of Kharkov Jewish community E. Khodos published proofs (“An Axe above Orthodoxy, or who killed my father.” Kharkov, 1999) showing that members of the Jewish Chabad movement carried out the 1990 murder of priest-Jew Father Aleksandr Men’ (who “carried out the divine service of the Akums” and dreamed about the creation of a “Jewish Orthodox Church,” something that is considered a criminal offense according to the laws of the state of Israel). But the authorities in the Russian Federation have not been interested in such evidence. Criminals are supposed to be sought only among “Russian anti-Semites”.

We would like to emphasize that the majority of anti-Jewish actions throughout the world are constantly arranged by Jews themselves with the purpose of provoking punitive measures against patriots. The best-known case in Russia is that of Arkady Norinsky, who in 1988 sent out anti-Semitic leaflets in the name of the organization “Pamyat’” in order to impel authorities to suppress it. In this he had the help of his fellow tribesman, the editor in chief of the journal Znamya, G. Baklanov, who published the leaflet in a print run of several millions. It was only after this that the provocation was uncovered. (“Znamya” No. 10, 1988; “Pravda”, 19 November1988; “Komsomol’skaya Pravda”, 24 November1988; “Ogonyok” No. 9, 1989).

From recent cases it is possible to mention a strange series of reports of vandalism that took place in 1998 and 1999. On the night of 13 May 1998, an explosion occurred at a synagogue in the Mar’inaya grove in Moscow damaging a wall. During the same day “a burning canister of gasoline” was placed not far from the synagogue in Otradny. In Irkutsk “a Jewish cemetery was desecrated” – of course the uproar in the international media was loud and all of them put the blame, without any evidence, on some sort of Russian Nazis (“Nezavisimaya Gazeta,” 15 May 1998).

But when shortly after that, in 1999, a synagogue in Birobidzhan was destroyed, it was established in court that the Jews themselves hired a man to do this. (“Radonezh”, 1999, No. 15-16), but the democratic mass media were silent about this.

On the basis of the rules and practices of Jewish behavior that have been cited above, it is not difficult to understand why a constant companion of Jews among all peoples has been notorious “anti-Semitism”, i.e., the non-acceptance of Judaic morality. For this very reason Jews did not have an equality of rights in the Christian states and attained it only as a result of anti-monarchist bourgeois revolutions.

Thus in the Russian Empire, the Jews, after unsuccessful attempts by the Tsarist government to give them the status “of everybody else,” lost their equality in the 19th Century, not because they were Jewish by blood – since the empire was multinational; nor because they were not Christian – since the Muslims and Buddhists and others were not Christians either; but because the Jewish religion is anti-Christian and misanthropic to the point of ritual murder. Many examples of this ritual extremism were documented in courts. (For example, see the study of the well-known scholar V. I. Dal’, Rozyskanie o ubinenii yevreyami khristianskikh mladentsev i upotreblenii krovi ikh [“Criminal investigation into the murder by Jews of Christian infants and the use of their blood.”] St. Petersburg, 1884).

To all this it is possible also to add the words of the Prayer of Shefokh, in which the Jews on the eve of their Passover issue a call their “god” “to exterminate from the universe” all other peoples.

Jewish Agressiveness as a Form of Satanism.

The spiritual reason for this hatred of humanity is explained in the Gospels in the words of Christ regarding the Jewish spiritual leaders who rejected the Son of the God: “Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning . . .” (John 8:19-44).

This elucidation of Judaic aggressiveness as a form of Satanism is generally accepted in Orthodoxy. Well-known philosopher-intellectuals who cannot be suspected of anti-Semitism expressed it. For example, A.F. Losev (in “Istochnik” Moscow, 1996, No. 4. pp. 117-122), Father Pavel Florensky (in the book “Sakharna”, by V. V. Rozanov.
Moscow. Izdatel’stvo “Respublika”, 1998, p. 360), and Father Sergiy Bulgakov: “the Jews who were rejecting Christ became the “laboratory for all sorts of spiritual diseases, poisoning the world and particularly Christian humanity.” (“Vestnik RKhD”, Paris, 1973 No. 108-110. p. 72). Even the Judeo-Christian Father Aleksandr Men’, who was struggling against “anti-Semitism”, asserted that the Jew who rejects Christianity, “betrays himself and easily falls under the power of dark forces.” (the journal “Yevrei v SSSR”, 1975, No. 11).

This, unfortunately is what happened with the larger part of the Jewish people (in contrast to its smaller part, which accepted Christianity). But they do not want to recognize this and believe that that statement of the truth by Christ and after him by Orthodox Christians is “insulting” to the Jews. Jewish plaintiffs frequently direct their charge of “anti-Semitism” against this essential part of Orthodox doctrine itself, demanding that it actually be banned (as in the case with the textbook “Osnov pravoslavnoy kul’tury” [“Bases of Orthodox Culture”]).

But we cannot agree with banning the Orthodox doctrine about the idea of history as the struggle of the forces of good (on the side of the Church) against the forces of evil (the side opposed to religion, that prepares for the reign of the antichrist).

Following the precepts of the Orthodox Fathers of the Church, we also cannot follow the false understanding that is spreading according to which tolerance is humbleness before the sin, evil, heresies, and in this case Satanism. The Christian must precisely from the respect for the image of God placed in each person, and for the sake of saving his soul, frankly indicate to Jews their dangerous deviation from the truth into Satanism. It is in this that, from a Christian point of view, the manifestation of authentic love for people consists. “Tolerant” indulgence of heresies and Satanism only contributes to their spiritual loss – and under their strong pressure – to that of their many victims.

One should immediately answer also the possible objection that the Russian patriots, who level charges at the Jews, do not always distinguish between religious and non-religious Jews, particularly since the majority of Jews do not consider themselves believers in Judaism and do not study the “Shulkhan Arukh.” But many generations of the self-contained life of Jews among other peoples (in this context there developed the idea of the Jewish kahal as a “state within a state” – see the books by Jewish authors: “Antisemitizm v drevnem mire” [“Antisemitism in the ancient world”] by S. Lur’e and the “Kniga Kagala” [“The Book of the Kahal”] by Yakov Brafman) led to the situation where the morality of the “Shulkhan Arukh” became a part of Jewish national self-consciousness even in its secular form.

This conclusion was drawn by the well-known Jewish writer and sociologist Hannah Arendt: “Precisely in the process of secularization was borne completely real Jewish chauvinism. . . . The idea of the chosenness of the Jews became . . . the idea that Jews supposedly were the salt of the earth. From now on, the old religious concept of chosenness was no longer the essence of Judaism; it became instead the essence of Jewishness.” (“Antisemitism”//”Sintaksis”Paris, No. 26, 1989) [English readers see Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism, New York: Schocken, 2004. p. 99.]

This “real Jewish chauvinism” and the unceremonious spirit of the “Shulkhan Arukh” were clearly visible in the course of the destruction the USSR and the post-communistic reforms in our country and were expressed in the illegal appropriation of state property as “goods with no owner,” and also in the composition of the new ruling stratum. “The government is full of Jews,” acknowledged the Rabbi Adolf Shayevich (“NH- Figury i litsa”, 1998, No. 16.). Thus, their corresponding influence on the life of the country proved to be completely disproportionate to their numbers (0,16 % according to the data of last census) to the detriment of the interests of all the other peoples of the country and especially the Russian people who formed the country.

The Jewish Revolution.

The well-known Jewish publicist L. Radzikhovsky calls this a ‘democratic-capitalist revolution’ and says: “The Jewish and Jewish-oriented intelligentsia, which constitutes in Russia one of the chief carriers of western-liberal ideology, became the ideologist of this revolution.’ Therefore ‘Jews have a larger specific weight in Russian politics and business than in the politics and business of any other Christian country.” This he calls the “good luck of the Jews” which was also the title of his article (“Yevreyskoe schast’e” in “Novoe Russkoe Slovo,” 17 January 1996.)”

The Jewish oligarchs themselves frankly described on Israeli television (2nd program, 3 October 1996) the sources of their “good luck” in the revolution that they perfected (the italics are ours):
“The degree of corruption in Russia completely corresponds to the degree of transformations in Russia. I do not think that in the hands of the officials of Israel . . . there is the possibility to redistribute wealth worth tens, hundreds of millions and billions . . . this was – no one’s, this was – the state’s, this was everyone’s! So here, an official had the capability to determine by drawing up a list: this belongs to you, or to someone else. . . . A good fight, which led to the result that we have today.” (Boris Berezovsky).

“Incomes like this and profits like this, which could be earned in Russia, could not be earned anywhere else. . . . A big share of capital there, 50 percent, belongs to Jewish business.” (Vitaly Malkin, now a member of the presidium of Russian Jewish Congress).
Vladimir Gusinsky, the first chairman of Russian Jewish Congress, in that broadcast said that one of the reasons for Jewish luck is their “ferocity.” “It is not so much the rules; it is more the rule of force, it is more the rule of aggression.”

“For the first time in thousands years, since the moment the Jews settled in Russia, we have obtained real authority in this country,” states another Jewish writer, E. Topol’, in an “Open letter to Berezovsky, Gusinsky, Smolensky, Khodorkovsky and the rest of the oligarchs” (“Otkrytoe pis’mo Berezovskomu, Gusinskomu, Smolenskomu, Khodorkovskomu i ostal’nym oligarkham,” in “Argumenty i Fakty”, 1998, No 38). In this connection, Topol’ and other sensitive Jews (for example, Yu. Nudel’man in “Sovyetskaya Rossiya”, 20 June 2002) emphasize that the destructive and self-interested policy of Jewish oligarchs, which degrades the Russian people, provokes the hostility of the Russian people to the Jews. This obvious fact was noted even by the ambassador of the Kingdom of Belgium to the Russian Federation, André Mernier, in his final report on his work, sent out to all foreign embassies and to his colleagues in the diplomatic corps in September 2004, before his departure from Moscow.

We request that the Procurator General’s office regard this opinion of Topol’ and Nudel’man as an acknowledgement that it is the accusing (Jewish) side that is responsible for the contemporary aggravation of the Russo-Jewish conflict.

This is especially true, given the fact that in order to keep their authority and their illegally seized “un-owned” state property, this ruling stratum conducts a policy designed to bring about the decay of the people’s morals and the removal of spiritual values, attempting to turn the people into an animal mass without faith and tradition – the more easily to govern them and the more easily to suppress their resistance.

In particular, it was precisely the Jews who put up furious resistance to teaching “Osnov pravoslavnoy kyl’tury” [“The Bases of Orthodox Culture”] in the schools, and it is precisely on the initiative of Jews that we, the Russian people who formed the country, are forbidden to indicate our nationality in our passports. The Chef Rabbi of the Russian Federation, Adolf Shayevich, in an interview with the “Los Angeles Times” (1 October 1997) confirmed that precisely the Jews insisted on the eliminating the entry for “nationality” [in passports], and he explained the reason for this by citing the fact that “Jews have taken high posts in the administration.” That is, even they themselves realize what kind of idea non-Jews have formed about their nationality, and therefore they attempt to hide their nationality. This also says a lot.

Among the other numerous examples of the removal of spiritual values we cannot but draw your attention, Mr. Procurator General, to the policy of the Minister of Culture Mikhail Shvydkoy (who now leads a government agency for the matters of culture) and its television program “Kul’turnaya revolyutsiya” [“Cultural Revolution”], in which Russian patriotism and Orthodox traditions regularly are degraded. It propagandizes obscenity and the idea that sex is the engine of culture” (7 March 2002). All protests of the Russian community against the scandalous and, in essence, provocative activity of this “chief man of culture in the country” have proven futile.

Moreover Shvydkoy and his associates have the central channels of Russian television at their disposal for their attacks, while the Orthodox patriot defendants have the tiny print runs [of publications], for which they are investigated and brought to trial. This inequality of opportunity can also lead them involuntarily to the excessive emotionalism, especially when they the rebuff the blasphemous and insolent anti-Russian actions of persons of Jewish origin.

But this emotionalism of defendants driven into a corner should not be mixed up with aggressive, offensive emotionalism. The Orthodox person is not allowed to be aggressive, but he is called on to protect its people and their sacred things. The example of this was given by Christ Himself, who by the whip was banished from the temple by the merchants who had profaned it.

What is permissible to whom?

In comparison with the statements of the accused Russian patriots, much more aggressive statements by Jews regarding non-Jews are printed in Jewish newspapers published in the Russian Federation. For example, in the organ of the Russian Jewish Congress, ‘Yevreyskie novosti’ (2002, No. 16, page 9) the Knesset deputy A. Lieberman called for the forcible expulsion of the Palestinians from Israel. Accordingly the Palestinians – in violation of UN Security Council resolutions! – are not only thrown out of their homeland (4 million refugees), but their activists are murdered along with their families. Thus does the Shulkhan Arukh show up in the state policy of Israel.

And the Jews of the Russian Federation support it. The Russian Jewish Congress states that one of its aims is “to conduct actions of solidarity with the people of Israel, carrying out political lobbying for the interests of Israel” (Yevreyskie novosti, 2002 No. 15, p. 5). The same goal is also pursued by the state Institute for the Study of Israel and the Near East, the leader of which, Yevgeny Satanovsky, simultaneously headed the Russian Jewish Congress.

Jewish communities all over the world carry out similar “political lobbying” for the interests of international Jewry to the detriment of the interests of the countries in which they live, and particularly in the USA. That state has become an instrument for the attainment of the global aims of Jewry. And they try to mask the racism of their Shulkhan Arukh by slapping the charge of anti-Semitism (i.e., allegedly racial hatred) on all those who do not agree with their morality, their activities, their wars.

But such a reversal of concepts is a crude forgery, as should be clear to any impartial judge. One can say that the whole democratic world today has fallen under the financial and political control of international Jewry, of which eminent bankers (Jacques Attali and others) are openly proud. And we do not see it as desirable that our Russia, against whose revival a permanent preventive war without rules is being conducted, should wind up among such unfree countries.

Therefore we, both in order to protect our fatherland and for personal self-defense, are forced to turn to you, Mr. Procurator General, with the imperative request that within the shortest period you verify the scandalous facts presented above and, if they are confirmed, on the basis of the corresponding articles of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation’s Law “on opposing extremist activity” (2002) and article 13 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation (“the creation and activity of public associations, the aim of which is directed towards kindling social, racial, national, and religious discord are prohibited”) to officially institute proceedings for the prohibition in our country of all religious and national Jewish associations as extremist. We also request that persons responsible for assigning to these associations state and municipal property, privileges, and state financing, be called to account regardless of the posts they occupy.

V. M. Klykov, people’s artist of Russia,
A. N. Krutov, Deputy to the State Duma, editor in chief of the magazine Russkiy Dom,
A. A. Senin, editor in chief of Russkiy vestnik,
M. V. Nazarov, publications chief of Russkaya ideya,
K. Yu. Dushenov, editor in chief of the newspaper Rus’ pravoslavnaya,
V. V. Khatyushin, deputy editor in chief of Molodaya gvardia,
A.V. Dzikovitsky, editor in chief of the newspaper Kazachiy vzglyad,
T. G. Basova, editor in chief of the newspaper Marsh Slavyanki,
V. F. Kalent’ev, editor in chief of the newspaper Otchizna,
And others (in all more than 500 signatories, among them 19 deputies to the State Duma).

2015 Saw ‘Most Violent’ Persecution of Christians by muslims in Modern History.

Originally posted by lorddreadnought at 2015 Saw ‘Most Violent’ Persecution of Christians by muslims in Modern History.

2015 Saw ‘Most Violent’ Persecution of Christians by muslims in Modern History

In 2015, nine out of the top ten countries where Christians suffer “extreme persecution” had populations that are at least 50 percent Muslim, a phenomenon replicated in 2016.

The 2015 report found that “Islamic extremism is by far the most significant persecution engine” of Christians in the world today and that “40 of the 50 countries on the World Watch List are affected by this kind of persecution.”

The 2016 list places Iraq in second place, immediately after North Korea, with horrific Islamic violence dominating news headlines during 2015. Throughout the year, Christians were forced to flee their homes by the thousands or be killed.

Just this week, the United Nations released an extensive report on Islamic State violence in Iraq, and estimates that ISIS currently holds some 3,500 people, mostly women and children, in the country.

The report, jointly issued by U.N. Assistance Mission for Iraq and U.N. human rights office in Geneva, declared ISIS atrocities in Iraq to be “war crimes, crimes against humanity, and possibly genocide.”

Some of the crimes described in the report include executions by shooting, beheading, bulldozing, burning alive and throwing people off the top of buildings.

The other nations making the top ten in Christian persecution are Eritrea, Afghanistan, Syria, Pakistan, Somalia, Sudan, Iran, and Libya, all of which have Muslim majorities.

The report underscores the geographical extent of Christian persecution, and Curry highlighted the global nature of the problem, noting that it has become more acute not just in a few isolated regions, but “in every continent in every country.”

“The levels of exclusion, discrimination and violence against Christians is unprecedented, spreading and intensifying,” Curry added. “Christians, longing to stay in their home countries, are being forced to flee for their lives and for their children’s lives,” he said.

The Centre for the Study of Global Christianity in the United States estimates that 100,000 Christians now die every year, targeted because of their faith – that is 11 every hour. The Pew Research Center says that hostility to religion reached a new high in 2012, when Christians faced some form of discrimination in 139 countries, almost three-quarters of the world's nations.

All this seems counter-intuitive here in the West where the history of Christianity has been one of cultural dominance and control ever since the Emperor Constantine converted and made the Roman Empire Christian in the 4th century AD.

Yet the plain fact is that Christians are languishing in jail for blasphemy in Pakistan, and churches are burned and worshippers regularly slaughtered in Nigeria and Egypt, which has recently seen its worst anti-Christian violence in seven centuries.

African voodoo 'magic' in UK. Human flesh 'on sale in London'.

Originally posted by lorddreadnought at African voodoo 'magic' in UK. Human flesh 'on sale in London'.

Police probe link between African magic and butchered remains of 5-year-old boy Antony Barnett, Paul Harris and Tony Thompson

Detectives hunting the killers behind the 'Torso in the Thames' child murder are investigating the illegal bushmeat trade after allegations that human flesh is being offered for sale in London.

Police believe that the murdered five-year-old, whom they have called Adam, was the victim of a ritualistic killing linked to a West African form of voodoo-like religion. Officers suspect that gangs illegally importing exotic meat, such as chimpanzee and bush rat from West Africa, are involved in trading in substances used in African witchcraft that may include human body parts.

Detectives from Operation Swalcliffe, which is investigating Adam's death, joined a raid on a north London shop last month by environmental health officers after a tip-off that human body parts were being sold. The officers seized two tonnes of unfit meat, including a crocodile head, used in ritualistic dishes to increase sexual stamina in men. They also found rat faeces, which had been removed from rats' intestines and prepared as a delicacy for possible use in a ritual.

The trade in importing bushmeat to Britain has boomed in recent years, but this was the first time evidence has been found linking it to witchcraft ceremonies. While police found no obvious traces of human flesh, packages of unidentifiable meat and ribs wrapped in plastic bags and stored in a backroom have been sent for DNA testing.

Clive Lawrence, Heathrow airport's meat transport director, who was on the raid, is convinced that human flesh is finding its way into the UK as part of the bushmeat. He believes that the trade is also linked to criminal gangs involved in people trafficking and drug smuggling.

'The intelligence we are receiving suggests human flesh is coming into this country," he said. 'We are dealing with some very nasty people.'

Experts believe African witchcraft rituals are on the increase in Britain. Professor Hendrick Scholtz, a South African expert in witchcraft and an adviser on Operation Swalcliffe, said: 'As these communities grow, elements of African culture will be inevitably transported to Britain.'

In the past year police have discovered seven incidences of West Africans conducting religious rituals on the banks of the Thames. They usually involve lighting candles and writing on white sheets that are then thrown them into the water. Early in their investigations, police thought seven half-burnt candles wrapped in a sheet near Battersea Power Station could hold the key to the murder. The name 'Adekoyejo Fola Adoye' was written on the sheet and carved in the candles.

However, detectives found that Adoye lived in New York and his London-based parents had performed a ceremony to celebrate the fact he was not killed in the 11 September terrorist attacks. Nevertheless, the revelation is thought to have surprised police who had been unaware such rituals had been taking place in public in the capital.

The use of human flesh is a taboo subject in many African communities, which stress that traditional culture abhors such acts. Scholtz said it is used when a normal animal sacrifice is considered insufficient. Human flesh is also typically used when a group of people is trying to achieve a common goal.

The possible uses of such body parts is varied: skin from a stomach can be used to cause pain to enemies, while fingernails and toenails are used in poisons. Eyebrows, hair and noses are often used in curses. Particularly strong magic is believed to reside in a person's genitalia. Breasts and genitalia from both sexes are used in love potions.

Police believe that Adam was brought to Britain as a slave and sacrificed in a ritual intended to bring good luck to his killers.

'There is an ongoing search for Adam's head and limbs and there is evidence to suggest a link between those who are involved and the trade in illegal animal parts and meat products,' said a spokesman for Operation Swalcliffe.

Privately, detectives believe Adam's arms, legs and skull have been kept as magical trophies. Two officers are in Nigeria trying to find his parents after DNA testing showed he was born there. They believe his death may be linked to an extreme element from the Yoruba people, a tribe with voodoo-like rituals.

Source: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2002/nov/03/ukcrime.antonybarnett

Horrors of diversity. African asylum seeker in UK gave six women HIV.

Originally posted by lorddreadnought at Horrors of diversity. African asylum seeker in UK gave six women HIV.

Black asylum seeker who had sex with scores of women while he worked illegally at a British campsite has given at least six HIV.

Caravan salesman Everson Banda, 29, worked at a caravan park in Essex for two years and slept with 13 members of staff and a number of holidaymakers during three seasons.
It was only after immigration officials had removed him that they discovered letters in his caravan from lawyers of women who claimed he had given them HIV. They named up to five distraught lovers infected with the virus - which causes Aids - after having sex with Banda who calls himself 'Ace'.

Panic spread through the Orchards Holiday Village near Clacton-on-Sea and a staff member also tested positive - she said Banda was the only man she had slept with.

The burly African, whose own health had been failing, was removed by the immigration service on August 19. He was arrested for overstaying and thrown out after he admitted his claim that he faced imprsionment, torture or death in Zimbabwe was false. A Home Office source said that if they had known Banda had the infection before he flew home he may have faced a police investigation.

Carriers of the virus who knowingly infect sexual partners have already been convicted of assault occasioning grievous bodily harm in British courts.

It is thought Banda entered Britain six years ago on a tourist visa but overstayed. He lied about his immigration status to first land a job as a security guard at the village and then work as a saleman. Although Banda lived in a tower block in central Southend, Essex, he was given use of a site caravan, which is where he seduced many of his conquests.

He is said to have wooed girls at the campsite's pubs and bars, plying them with drink before walking them back to his berth. He was told in April last year to become a registered security guard if he wanted to continue working there.

But he could not provide a passport or visa for the post and talked bosses into appointing him as a caravan salesman, selling mobile homes priced £17,000 to £75,000. He became the lover of another salesgirl who has so far not tested positve for HIV.

Banda is believed to have infected another colleague who regularly became ill with colds and after going to her doctor was horrified to discover she was HIV positive.
His most recent girlfriend was a Polish barmaid who recently returned to her homeland unaware of his dark secret.

A source in the camp told The Sun: "In the three seasons he had been here, Banda's health had been slowly deteriorating.

"His skin had been falling off his face and scalp, and he had been losing his hair. "He started out quite muscular but in recent times he had lost a lot of weight. At the time people blamed it on stress, they said he had immigartion problems. "When the guys went into his caravan, they also found a lot of medication, tablets in silver foil wrappers.

"Perhaps he was leaving them as a sign to say what he had done and to tell his lovers they must get tested." Holidaymakers come to the popular seaside campsite form as far away as Belgium, Poland and Germany.

Home Office sources confirmed Banda had been 'removed' back to Zimbabwe after dropping a political asylum claim following his arrest for overstaying. A source said: "It wasn't until after his arrest that we became aware he was HIV positive. "This has no relevance to our handling of the case but came to light in the course of our enquiries.

"Banda claimed asylum soon after his arrest for overstaying - then dropped his claims and agreed to be removed back to Zimbabwe. "Perhaps he realised it was a good opportunity to get away from the terrible situation he had created."

An immigration service spokesman refused to comment on Banda's case saying "We do not comment on individual cases." A spokesman for The Orchards Holiday Park said: "We are now carrying out a full investigation and are in contact with the Home Office and Immigration Directorate to discover how Everson Banda was able to enter this country with forged documents and gain employment.

"This is a most unfortunate situation and we are co-operating fully with the Home office, police and any other interested parties to find out the truth of the matter."

Source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-405108/Asylum-seeker-gave-women-HIV.html

What is Vladimir Putin’s true Syria game?

Originally posted by lorddreadnought at What is Vladimir Putin’s true Syria game?

President Vladimir Putin is actively misinforming his domestic audience and the international community about Russia’s first military intervention outside the former Soviet Union since Afghanistan. Putin has created a false narrative about the Islamic State of Iraq and alSham (ISIS) to disguise the true objectives behind Russia’s intervention Syria and is using this narrative to manipulate the international community.

The Putin's "war on terror" in Syria is a massive fraud based on deception and illusion. The official statements said that Russia needs to take “responsibility” to start the War on Terror. “Responsibility” is the Orwellian newspeak for: bomb, attack, invade, occupy, kill, genocide, plunder, devastate sovereign nations under the pretext of some staged reason or a simple lie. The same Kremlin responsibility killed at least 2 000 000 Afghans in 1980 - 1990. The same Kremlin “responsibility” was killing more than 200 000 civilians in Chechnya in 1994-2000. The same Kremlin “responsibility” was killing thousands of innocent civilians in Ukraine in 2014-2015.

Still, oil prices were the key reason for Putinist Russia to enter into Syrian conflict. Oil and gas sales bring in nearly 50 percent of Russia’s government revenues; they also account for 70% percent of Russia’s export proceeds. Russian nominal GDP due to the fall of oil and gas prices has shrunk more than twice since 2014. Now it is likely that Italy, India, Canada, Spain and Australia and even New York city, are all more economically significant than Russia. Moscow is so dependent on oil sales to keep its economy chugging along that Russia is estimated to lose $2 billion in potential sales for every dollar the price of oil drops.

Before Putin intervened in Syrian conflict, he tried to settle the deal with Saudis. Saudi officials met with Russian bigwigs during August 2015 to settle the deal over Syria and oil prices. No doubt that Kremlin offered to disband Assad regime in exchange for boost of oil-prices. But sides didn’t produce the right outcome for either side. After that meeting, the Saudi King meets with President Obama and announces Saudi support for the Iran nuke deal. Then Moscow begins to fly in Russian tanks and ground troops to Syria, and some leading-edge fighter jets and anti-aircraft missiles. After Kremlin plan to reason with Saudis over oil prices failed, Putin desperately needs to create chaos in the Middle East in order to raise the oil prices.

Putin is also using his forces in Syria for blocking construction of oil and natural gas pipeline corridor through the Middle East to Europe. The more Putin can entrench himself in the Middle East, the more he can exert control over energy markets. With Syria, Iran and Iraq in his sphere of influence, Putin can block any alternative supply of oil and gas to Europe and begin to force E.U. to rely on him again for supplies and rise up the prices for oil and natural gas considerably.

The U.S. State Department reported that more than 90% of Russian airstrikes and cruise missiles landed within territory controlled by non-ISIS rebels.

That is why the main target of Russian forces in Syria is not ISIS, the main target is pro-Western “rebels”. After U.K. joins France and US in bombing ISIS, Bashar Assad has called Britain’s airstrikes on ISIS “harmful and illegal”. The same way he reacted on US airstrikes, then why some people believe that Putin and Assad fight with ISIS?

ISIS includes an estimated 7,000 foreign fighters from the former Soviet Union and declared its own governorate in Russia’s restive North Caucasus region. Russia’s air campaign is focused on targeting Syrian armed opposition groups fighting against Syrian President Bashar al-Assad rather than ISIS. Kremlin dreams to transfer ISIS terrorist activities from Syria to Iraq and Saudi Arabia, where terrorists can hit oil pipes, which in turn will give Russia additional hundreds of billions dollars in potential oil and gas export revenue.

Putin is also getting involved in Syria in order to distract attention from his continued expansionism in Ukraine. That he is looking for something to trade in exchange for the West allowing Russian consolidation in Ukraine to continue. Looking around the globe, there aren't too many places where Russia can offer the West something it needs. Syria is one place where Russia could potentially help the U.S. and Europe achieve a necessary objective.

But Russia has no fundamental strategic interest in Assad or Syria. Putin is simply taking advantage of a target of opportunity.

Assad must know this -- but he’s also desperate to maintain the existence of his regime, as Putin told reporters (apparently with a chuckle) Monday during Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s visit.

Nearly four months into its intervention, Russia is an active combatant in the Syrian civil war. This is not just an assertion. It is borne out by casualty figures and the refugee flows.

The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights confirm in their latest figures that Russian air strikes have killed more Syrian opposition fighters than they have Islamic State (IS) group fighters. Worse yet, any vestiges of a moderate resistance to Assad’s regime could be driven into Islamic State camps, should Russia’s strikes continue to leave those camps unscathed.

US administration is relaxed about letting Syrian fires burn, as any Syrian lobbyist in Washington will unhappily relate. Washington analysts is deeply sceptical about the prospect of an early solution to the war. They know Russia will get itself deeper and deeper into this conflict but they are not bothered by it. It was Putin's fundamental mistake to think that they were.

Each foreign intervention in Middle East creates its own dynamic. Russia's is no exception. Their bombing raids have left thousands more Syrian fighters with a score of their own to settle. They have TOW missiles and they pray for Russian tanks to come into range. The popular rage is great. Putin should not think he can re-arrange the Muslim House in Syria any more successfully than he has done so in the North Caucasus. That was the main reason why Kremlin accepted it's defeat in Syria and decided to withdraw.

Putin’s War Crimes in Syria shocked European media.

Originally posted by lorddreadnought at Putin’s War Crimes in Syria shocked European media.

Leading German daily tabloid Das Bild has called Russian President Vladimir Putin a "war criminal."

According to the article ran by the medium, the Russian army is not only providing support to the Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad in his crimes, but also involved in the bombing of Syrians.

This week, humanitarian organizations warned of a sharp deterioration in the humanitarian situation in Syria as a result of Russian airstrikes.

According to Bild, the airstrikes began to target "border crossings between Syria and Turkey, and the roads used to deliver food, water, and medicines." An important checkpoint of Bab al-Salam, where trucks delivering food, fuel, and essential civilian supplies in Syria used to gather, was impacted three times over the past five days.

"Another humanitarian catastrophe is looming there as a result," Director of Mercy Corps' operations in North Syria and Turkey stressed. According to him, the charity organization was able to deliver only one-fifth of the planned volume of food since the beginning of the Russian campaign in Syria.Source:

According to UN report, Russian airstrikes have also destroyed 10 bakery plants supplying bread to almost 200,000 people in the Syrian Idlib province since Nov. 24. Several mills and grain elevators were covered by the airstrikes as well. The sewage treatment plant was also destroyed in the ISIS-controlled Aleppo province, although it was passed by Russia as an Islamic State's oil refinery.

Exclusive report obtained from Aleppo Syria reveal on Monday, Jan. 11th Russian warplanes pounded an elementary school in the town of Khan Tooman killing scores of children. This heinous attack was simultaneous with a raid by the Iranian regime sectarian militants in coordination with the Russian airplanes.

The area of attack is under the control of the Free Syrian Army. Three consecutive attacks on this school has left more than 35 children killed and over 90 others wounded. The children were during examination when the attacks took place.

Both the Observatory and the Syrian Network for Human Rights (SNHR) put the civilian death toll from Russian strikes at between 1,000 and 1,200.

A similar picture is revealed by refugee movements since 30 September when the bombing campaign began. Over a hundred thousand refugees have fled to the Turkish and Jordanian borders. Between 5 and 22 October last year the UN reported that Russian air strikes led to the displacement of 120,000 people from Aleppo, Hama and Idlib.

Under the doctrine of "command responsibility," which was first established in the Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907 and first applied after World War I, top officials can be prosecuted for failing to stop war crimes and other atrocities that they were aware of, he said.

"The use of barrel bombing is a war crime. The use of indiscriminate attacks on civilians is a war crime," he said. "To the extent that the Russian or Iranian governments have provided economic assistance, military assistance, and the presence of advisors or supporters, any crimes that are being committed by the Syrian military are also attributable to those who assist them, namely the Iranians and the Russians."

In addition to over 2,000 barrel bombs the Assad regime has dropped on civilians since July, there is evidence that the regime has used chemical weapons against civilians and employed systematic torture to kill at least 11,000 civilians in custody. All of these actions could form the basis for future prosecutions against the Assad military and top Syrian officials, on charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity.

Any accountability for war crimes in Syria is probably years away, and Russia has already vetoed efforts to refer the Syria charges to the International Criminal Court. But if a prosecution happens, the experts say, Putin could be held responsible just as Taylor was.

"The Russians are walking into a situation where they could be held criminally responsible," said Stephen Rapp, who served as the United States ambassador at large for war crimes from 2009 until this year. "If you aid the Syrian air force in committing war crimes such as dropping barrel bombs on civilians, you can find yourself held responsible right up to the top, including President Putin."

As Russian involvement in Syria increases, those who track war crimes are watching not just Assad, but also Putin.

What is White Genocide – A Thorough Explanation.

Originally posted by lorddreadnought at What is White Genocide – A Thorough Explanation.

All you want to know about White Genocide.

“White genocide” is a term that is receiving greater attention lately in media and in online communities, but not everyone fully understands its meaning. We have recently written an article that touches upon this subject, but this article aims to explain this term in more detail in order to provide a better understanding of the phenomenon of White genocide.

But before we go on to define White genocide, let us take a look at the actual definition of genocide and how it came to be.

The term “genocide”, which many of us take for granted today, actually did not exist before 1944, until it was coined by a man with the name of Raphael Lemkin. The purpose was to define violent crimes committed against various groups of people in our societies with the intent to cause harm to that specific group of people, as there was a growing need to articulate and define Human rights after the events of World War 2, and it became imperative to ensure the rights of individuals and groups alike.

The word “genocide” has been quite effectively established since then, and today most people think they know the definition of “genocide”. Ask a person what it means and they would most likely tell you that it is simply an act of killing a group of people with the purpose of destroying them with the means of violent bloodshed. However, the term is much more complex than that, which becomes clear if you actually read the definition as presented in the UN international Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Crime of Genocide.

What does the UN convention say about genocide?

As stated in article number two in the genocide convention:

Article II: In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

When reading the actual article, it becomes evident that there are several definitions within the term “genocide”. According to Raphael Lemkin, who is responsible for the legal definition of the word used today, it does not matter how you try to eliminate a national, ethnical, racial or religious group of people, or even individuals belonging to such groups, it is still regarded as genocide:

Genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation . . . It is intended to signify a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves. The objectives of such a plan would be the disintegration of the political and social institutions, of culture, language, national feelings, religion, and the economic existence of national groups, and the destruction of the personal security, liberty, health, dignity, and even the lives of the individuals belonging to such groups.

Yet most people are only familiar with point (a) Killing members of the group. This is the most common definition and is probably the only one most people are familiar with. But let’s take a look at the other points as well in context to current global policies.

If we look at Western countries we can indeed see traces of point (b), (d) and not to mention (c). Regarding point (b) in Western White countries, the phenomenon of cultural Marxism has without doubt caused mental harm to our people. For generations, our people have been taught that we have a collective guilt as White people, and that we are responsible for most of the world’s problems in one way or another. We are encouraged to feel ashamed of ourselves and of our history and ancestry. We Whites are the only ones that are told that we should be punished for historical acts of slavery or conquest, as if we are exclusively responsible for the past deeds of our ancestors or were exclusively the only peoples on Earth who committed such deeds in the past. Belief systems such as these have left our people brainwashed to be indifferent to our extinction, and today many of our people suffer from an anti-White mentality.

As for point (d), it can be argued that even this point is relevant today considering the norm of free abortion. Today, it is not unusual for Western women to use abortion as a form of birth control. Regardless of what your opinions are on the matter, the results of the matter (as well as other factors) have led to a very low birth rate among us Whites. Instead of having more children, we expect immigrants to replace our decreasing population and our diminishing workforce.

In any case, it is the point (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part, that is the main aspect of “White genocide”.

If we observe what is happening in the Western world, we can witness that there is in fact a policy of non-stop massive Third World immigration into all White countries and only White countries. These open border policies which will lead to a White minority in our countries, combined with forced assimilation and legally forcing White areas to become more “diverse” (meaning less White people and a blended humanity in all and only White countries), is what qualifies it as (white) genocide as defined by Article II part (c) of the United Nations Genocide Conventions, because these deliberate policies are inflicting our people conditions of life calculated to bring about our physical destruction in whole or in part.

Ok I understand but are these policies really being enforced?

Yes. I asked that very same question myself a few years ago but once I started to look at the world map with this new perspective it became evident that this is no coincidence. You see these policies being enforced in every Western country with a predominately White population. They call it “diversity” and “multiculturalism”, but in reality it is just nice sounding words to say “open borders” and “less White people” if you think about it.

We don’t see an open border policy in China.

We don’t hear anyone demanding Saudi Arabia to take in any number of refugees, and we don’t hear anyone calling Japan nazis for not wanting to be multicultural.

All non-White countries are allowed to be homogenous.

If Peru or Algeria closed their borders tomorrow no one would call them “racist”, but we all know what would happen if Germany or UK would choose to close their borders. We are not allowed to vote on these policies, despite a growing concern among European populations. There must be an open border policy into White countries. Anyone who opposes these policies is called a “racist” or a “naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews”. This is all part of the anti-White mindset.

Are similar policies enforced anywhere else that is considered genocide?

One need only to look East to see very similar policies being taken place in the occupied land of Tibet. The situation in Tibet is that they have a forced open border policy and are subjected to a mass Han-Chinese immigration. The ethnic Tibetans are now in fact a minority in their own country. Their culture is undergoing profound changes and the population is forced to assimilate with the foreign migrants. The Tibetans have had no choice in this matter, they are not allowed to vote for or against these policies taking place.

Sounds familiar?

The consequences of these policies will lead to an even more reduced population of Tibetans, and if nothing changes they will ultimately risk extinction if the Han-Chinese continue with these policies. In other words – genocide.

Dalai Lama himself has of course spoken out against these policies several times, but to no avail. He has even questioned the similar policies taken place in Europe, warning about the consequences of the massive Third World immigration and the refugee-phenomenon.

Tibet is of course only one contemporary example of the acts of genocide, there are many historical examples of such acts which we will not go into detail here.

But the question we should all ask ourselves after reading all this is: if what is happening in Tibet is acknowledged as genocide by internal law and per definition, then why do some people deny it when the very same policies are being enforced in predominantly White countries?

Source: http://thisiseuropa.net/whatiswhitegenocide/

Jewish singer, David Draiman, admitted that he fucks on an altar in Christian Church.

Originally posted by lorddreadnought at Jewish singer, David Draiman, admitted that he fucks on an altar in Christian Church.

David Draiman is the front man for the multiplatinum headbangers Disturbed. Draiman attended five Jewish day schools, including Wisconsin Institute for Torah Study in Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Valley Torah High School in Los Angeles, California, and Fasman Yeshiva High School in Chicago, Illinois. Draiman later enrolled at Ida Crown Jewish Academy in Chicago, Illinois, where he graduated from high school in 1991. From there, in 1991–1992, he spent a year after high school studying at the Yeshivas Neveh Zion in Kiryat Ye'arim, on the outskirts ofJerusalem, Israel. The United States Holocaust Museum featured Draiman in their "Voices on Antisemitism — A Podcast Series" show.

Prior to the release of the alt-metal juggernaut's much-anticipated sophomore album, “Believe”, Dramain answered a dozen dirty questions to Playboy about his sexual proclivities. He gave up the goods on onstage erections and sex on drugs. But one of the question was where he have had most unusual sex. Draiman: “Believe it or not, in an abandoned christian church on an altar. A girl that I liked was pretending that she was a little more evil than she was”.

And after such sexual activities, that son of bitch, will keep singing to us about holocaust and “poor” Jewish nation.

Russian Orthodox Church and KGB.

Originally posted by lorddreadnought at Russian Orthodox Church and KGB.

Because Patriarch Kirill is of central importance to the myth of Putin as the Saul-to-Paul, Christian persecutor-to-Christian champion, it behooves us to more closely examine the man.

In January 2009, Vladimir Mikhailovich Gundyayev is a Russian Orthodox bishop of Finno-Ugrik origin, better known as Metropolitan Kirill of Smolensk and Kaliningrad, was elected, from a short list of three candidates, to be the 16th Patriarch of Moscow and All Russia, the highest position of authority in the Russian Orthodox Church (ROC). The election was called to fill the post that had been left vacant by the death of Patriarch Alexy II, who had headed the ROC since 1990.

Prior to becoming Patriarch, Kirill was Archbishop (later Metropolitan) of Smolensk and Kaliningrad beginning on 26 December 1984; and also Chairman of the Orthodox Church's Department for External Church Relations and a permanent member of the Holy Synod beginning in November 1989. Russian media made no big secret that a spectacular career of Gundyayev in the church hierarchy was made because of his close cooperation with the Soviet secret services and open support for the communist regime. Even after, Gundyev was elected as Patriarch of Moscow, he continue to praise Joseph Stalin and USSR.

Russian Orthodox Church (ROC) is an extremely wealthy organization. It’s 2013 revenues totaled 4.6 billion rubles ($153 millions). A large part of its riches comes from Putin’s government.

According to the popular web site Polit.ru, the Kremlin allocated 958 million rubles from the Russia’s budget to the ROC just for the 2015 program for “Strengthening the unity of the Russian nation.” In May of this year, 1.1 billion rubles have been already spent for creation of 23 “spiritual education” ROC organizations. Each of the organizations received an average of 25-30 million rubles. All together the federal budget of Russia is ready to allocate 2 billion rubles for the creation of spiritual and educational centers for the ROC.

The words of Patriarch Kirill that were directed to Russian president Vladimir Putin, which were nationally broadcast by the Channel One of the Russian TV, are widely known among Russians:

“I should tell openly, since I am Patriarch, whose duty is to tell only the truth, disregarding political situation or demands of propaganda, I should tell that you personally, Vladimir Vladimirovich, played a decisive role in the final straightening of the crooked line of the Russian history.”

Earlier, in his other published conversation with Putin, Patriarch stated:

“It is a great pleasure for me, as the Primate of the Russian Orthodox Church, to know that today, in the new reality of church-state relations, there was created with your direct involvement the right conditions for further fruitful cooperation between the Church and the apparatus of the Russian government, it’s many ministries and agencies. Together we will take care of the moral health of our society, the strengthening of peace and social harmony, and increase the international prestige of Russia.”

Where are the roots of so effective understanding, love and cooperation between the church and contemporary leadership of Russia?

Lev Ponomaryov, a well-known Russian human rights activist and Executive Director of the Russian National Movement For Human Rights, who in 1991 was a head of the Parliamentary Commission studying activity of the last communists’ anti–Gorbachev plot, recently told the Russian newspaper Express:

“Specific research concerning the relationship of the Church and KGB was professionally led by a member of our commission, dissident priest Gleb Yakunin. He, like I, also was a Member of Parliament and had the opportunity to work in the archives of the KGB.

“In particular, he studied the working documents of the 5th department of the KGB, which was engaged in spying on ‘internal enemies of the state’. It was, in fact, the political police with a well-developed network of agents spread throughout society.

Yakunin found the documents proving that all (!) top functionaries of Russian Orthodox Church were recruited by the KGB. Among others there was then Patriarch Alexy II. His undercover KGB agent’s nickname was Drozdov. Militantly atheistic Soviet government awarded Patriarch Alexy II the Red Banner and Friendship of Peoples Orders. In 1988 – he was awarded even a special diploma of the KGB …”

In truth, not only the entire Orthodox Church leadership was permeated by KGB agents, but also the leadership of Muslims and all other religions represented in the Soviet Union. After the fall of communism, some of them confessed that previously collaborated with the KGB.

Lithuanian Archbishop Chrysostomos found the courage to confirm his undercover KGB past under the nickname “Restorer”. A KGB agent with the nickname of Aramis, who worked as a translator in the Department for External Church Relations of the Moscow Patriarchate, decided to repent in the newspaper Arguments and Facts (№ 8, 1992). He said that almost all the employees of the Department for External Church Relations of the Moscow Patriarchate had worked for KGB. At that time, from 1989 to 2009 the department was headed by the current Patriarch of the Russian Orthodox Church Kirill.

Undercover KGB agent Vladimir Gundiayev (nickname Mikhailov), a representative of the Russian Orthodox Church to the World Council of Churches (WCC) in Geneva in 1971.

Now he is known as Kirill , the Patriarch of Moscow and all Russia.

Patriarch Kirill of Moscow and All Russia quotes:

“A crackdown on far-right movements is the path we must follow today in order to lead interethnic relations out of their current dangerous state,” Patriarch Kirill told reporters in response to Saturday’s riot on Manezhnaya Square in central Moscow.

”Hate crimes are endangering Russia’s progress and should be stopped at all cost.”

“Russia needs to revive Soviet-era sense of solidarity.”

“Russia should build itself around all the good things that made the Soviet era stand out.”

We must never forget the achievement of the Soviet people, “and not just the military.”

“What about those Komsomol members (young Communists) who gathered crops, built the BAM (Baikal-Amur Mainline railway), without getting awards or privileges in return? It is a sense of teamwork, a sense of desiring to join efforts and do something good for your country.”

The idea of unity and continuity of the historical memory, protecting the national heritage against falsifications, against biased misinterpretation of the past reality “must form a base of values for cooperation among political forces,” the patriarch said.

Putin: Jews fleeing Western Europe should move to Russia.

Originally posted by lorddreadnought at Putin: Jews fleeing Western Europe should move to Russia.

Vladimir Putin said that Jews who flee Europe due to anti-Semitic violence should move to Russia.

Let them come to us. In the Soviet Union they used to go away, now let them come back,” Putin said with a smile after he heard that Western Europe faces a “very real prospect of an exodus of Jews.”

European Jewish Congress President Moshe Kantor issued the warning during a meeting between the Russian president and delegates from seven European Union member states, the EJC said in a statement.

“While Jews were once again a prominent target for global terror during 2015, the attacks in Paris, the US, and elsewhere, and the mass murder of Russians on an airline in the Sinai, show that the terrorists target us all,” Kantor said during the meeting, which was also attended by EJC delegates from France, Britain, Spain, Austria, Belgium, Switzerland and Latvia.

Moshe Kantor the president of the European Jewish Congress. (Orel Cohen/FLASH90)

“There is a very real prospect of an exodus of Jews from certain parts” of the continent, where Jews are feeling less safe than a decade ago, Kantor told Putin.

The Jewish leader was born in what is today Russia, and has business enterprises there.

Kantor said that “pragmatic nations” must unite “in defeating global terror, which is being led by the so-called Islamic State.”

He noted that the delegation was pleased by the statistical decrease of anti-Semitism in Russia.

“We commend the Russian authorities in the fight against those who target Jews,” he said.

Source: http://www.timesofisrael.com/putin-jews-fleeing-western-europe-should-move-to-russia/

Largest nationalist party in France, Front National, allied with Jews.

Originally posted by lorddreadnought at Largest nationalist party in France, Front National, allied with Jews.

Council of French Jewish Organizations was conceived by Napoleon in an effort to modernize the state, in the aftermath of the emancipation of the Jews during the French Revolution. This emancipation had actually been the first of its kind in Europe, and its effects were to be felt through all the continents. France was always the place where local ‘patriots’ have strong ties to massonic and other jewish supremacist organizations.

Long associated with anti-Semitism and conspiracy theories, the French National Front of late has been toning down its language and moving toward respectability under the leadership of Marine Le Pen. The party’s president since 2011, Le Pen, who campaigns on pro-jewish, an anti-immigration and anti-European platform, is increasingly seen as a serious presidential candidate in the 2017 elections.

Marine Le Pen assumed the leadership of the National Front in 2011, replacing her father. He had run the party with his deputy, Bruno Gollnisch, who was also convicted of denying the Holocaust, though the ruling was overturned by a higher court. Together they seemed happy to make the National Front the bete noire of the political establishment.

After assuming the party leadership, Le Pen stripped Gollnisch of his duties at the European Parliament, leading him to observe last year that she “seeks to keep me and her father in a certain state of virginity” — a phrase pundits took to be a euphemism for impotence. She repeatedly has condemned anti-Semitism and punished a party official who made anti-Semitic statements. In 2011, Le Pen dispatched her life partner and National Front Vice President Louis Alliot on a bridge-building mission to Israel.

A recently published survey of 1,095 self-identified Jews showed that the National Front had more than doubled its share of the Jewish vote in the 2012 presidential elections, earning 13.5 percent of Jewish support. But with roughly 600,000 people, the Jewish community of France—meaning simply the total number of Jews in the country—accounts for no more than 0.7 percent of the population so there was no reason to placate Jews if only they do not pay the bills of the party. Zionist media also gave full support not to the National Front, the survey by the IFOP polling company grabbed headlines in major publications because it was seen as a worrisome indicator that a party once shunned by the mainstream is gaining full media support.

The National Front, was the xenophobic and populist right-wing party, but after Marine Le Pen and her Zionist friends take power, front is doing its best these days to drag French Jews into its ranks. One of the most prominent figures of the party, Gilbert Collard, is coming out with a new statement defending Israel against the so-called “pro-Palestinian” demonstrations.

Now, Front National has a lot of ethnic Jews inside the organization itself. For example, Rachline, a National Front activist since the age of 15 and the son of a Jewish father, won 45 percent of the vote in Fréjus last March. During his campaign, he spoke out against the building of a new mosque in town. With a population of 53,000, Fréjus is one of the more substantial communities run by the National Front. Rachline has since become one of the first two members of the party ever elected to France’s Senate.

Under Marine Le Pen, party officials for the first time began courting Jewish votes by addressing letters to their communities. One such letter was sent this month by Julien Leonardelli, a party regional secretary from the Toulouse area, to a local Jewish community center that assailants earlier this year attacked with firebombs.

Leonardelli wrote of his “grave concern at the increase of anti-Semitic attacks” in France, which he said were the result of irresponsible immigration policies by the Socialist Party and the UMP party of former President Nicolas Sarkozy.

As a National Front representative and spokesperson for Marine Le Pen, I express deep indignation over these acts and assure all our Jewish compatriots of our full support in the fight against all forms of anti-Semitism,” Leonardelli wrote.

Her father was not much better. Despite his many anti-semitic remarks, he also nany times tried to better the party’s relationship with the Jewish community, even though I do not like the term. Take his trip to the United States to the World Jewish Congress in ’86, for instance. The recorded fact is that, at he also publicly expressed his admiration for the Israel army in its war against Egypt.

Fake French nationalists. Marine Le Pen slams anti-semitism to satisfy Israel lobby.

Originally posted by lorddreadnought at Fake French nationalists. Marine Le Pen slams anti-semitism to satisfy Israel lobby.

French presidential hopeful Marine Le Pen is attempting to win the favor of Israel lobby groups for her far-right Front National party.

According to the website of the pro-Israel group Europe-Israël, Le Pen told the founder of the European Jewish Parliament, a communal organization based in Brussels, that “anti-Semitism has no place in the Front National.”

Le Pen also reportedly told Jewish oligarch Vadim Rabinovich at their meeting in the French city of Strasbourg that “she would not accept Front National members who have anti-Semitic opinions” or “who support a boycott of Israel.”

The far-right leader reportedly characterized the boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) movement in support of Palestinian rights as “racist.”

Le Pen’s conflation of anti-Semitism, of which her party has a long and notorious tradition, on the one hand, and Palestine solidarity activism, on the other, converges with the strategy being pushed by the Socialist administration of President François Hollande.

The Front National’s anti-immigrant and anti-Muslim invective are increasingly in tune with mainstream French xenophobia, especially in the wake of the murders at the anti-Muslim magazine Charlie Hebdo and at a Jewish supermarket in Paris in January.

In the US, there is nothing new in prominent pro-Israel figures, such as Anti-Defamation League President Abraham Foxman, pursuing alliances with notorious Islamophobes for the sake of Israel.

But in France, the Front National remains 'saddled' with its history of Holocaust denial and of promoting hatred and suspicion of Jews.

Seeking the endorsement of Israel lobby groups is therefore a shrewd way for Le Pen to try to shed that baggage. In that vein, we can expect that the BDS movement will be an increasingly popular target for ambitious French pro-zionist politicians, just as it is for American ones.

How We Know That Kremlin-Backed Separatists Shot Down MH17 In The Eastern Ukraine.

Originally posted by lorddreadnought at How We Know That Kremlin-Backed Separatists Shot Down MH17 In The Eastern Ukraine.

One year after 298 civilians fell to earth over eastern Ukraine, Putin’s regime is still denying culpability. Here’s definitive evidence to the contrary.

It’s been more than a year since Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 was shot out of the sky, killing all 298 civilians onboard. The results of the official inquiry have yet to be released, and while the fact that this Boeing 777 was immolated has not been disputed, various theories have been floated by the Russian government, and other interested parties as to how it was and who ultimately bears responsibility for this tragedy.

The last year has seen Moscow lie, fabricate, and insult the intelligence of all thinking people by tossing up self-evidently absurd “explanations” for how almost 300 innocents met their end. The Kremlin has also conducted a concerted smear campaign against journalists and investigators trying to unearth the truth in every damning detail. Most recently, President Vladimir Putin has rejected a Dutch attempt to convene an international tribunal seeking to find out who was responsible for the MH17 tragedy, saying it would be “counterproductive.” In short, in trying to hide its culpability for a horrific accident, the Kremlin has disparaged the memory of the victims and mocked the suffering of their survivors. It has therefore compounded a crime of sheer negligence with the greater one of obstruction of justice.

A Buk surface-to-air missile downed flight MH17, Dutch investigators have said as they unveiled a reconstruction of the plane that showed huge shrapnel damage to the cockpit and front section. Tjibbe Joustra, the chairman of the Dutch safety board, said the Malaysia Airlines plane was hit on 17 July 2014, as it flew at 33,000ft (10,000 metres) above eastern Ukraine. MH17 was shot down over eastern Ukraine by a Russian-made Buk 9M38M1 anti-aircraft missile from separatist-held territory on July 17, 2014, the warhead was fitted to a “9M28 missile” fired from a Russian-built Buk missile system, Dutch Safety Board chairman Tjibbe Joustra told reporters on Oct. 13.

The vast majority of the evidence adds credibility to the theory that an anti-aircraft Buk missile launcher, controlled by either Russian soldiers or Russian-backed fighters and fired from a field south of the town of Snezhnoye, destroyed the commercial airliner. The Buk is an advanced weapons system capable of destroying military aircraft or even ballistic missiles at an altitude up to 82,000 feet, and so its presence on Ukraine’ battlefield was always set to change both the scope and intensity of the conflict. But it suspiciously arrived in the arsenal of the Russian-backed fighters at a time when the Ukrainian military was making rapid gains and was perhaps closing in on a military solution to the conflict.

Before MH17

After Russia’s illegal annexation of Crimea in March 2014, bands of pro-Russian fighters began to seize police stations, government buildings, and other strategic areas across eastern Ukraine. Even at that time there was evidence that these raids were organized or led by men who were associated with or members of the Russian military. Initially, the Ukrainian military, left in serious disrepair by the ousted Yanukovych government, was hesitant to respond to this threat. It’s likely that the Ukrainian interim government was initially concerned about a possible counter-revolution launched by disloyal members of the police, military, and security apparatus. Whatever the cause, the “separatists” began to take control of large parts of eastern Ukraine.

The Ukrainian military began its “Anti-Terror Operation,” or ATO, in April to reclaim territory that had been seized by the pro-Russian insurgents, many of whom were operating under the command of Russian citizens (and probably Russian soldiers) who arrived to fight against the new government in Kiev. On June 7, Ukraine elected its first post-revolution president, Petro Poroshenko, who won partially as a result of his pledge to restore order quickly to eastern Ukraine. The ATO had already started to gain momentum throughout May but, perhaps feeling that it had survived the aftermath of a sometimes violent revolution and now had a public mandate to act, the Poroshenko government mobilized the military to confront the separatist threat even more forcefully.

And for a while, it worked. By early July, the Russian-backed fighters had begun to lose considerable ground, including the key coastal city of Mariupol. On July 5, the Ukrainian military regained control of Slavyansk and nearby Kramatorsk, two major separatist bases. The next day Ukraine regained control of Artemivsk; by July 7 the majority of separatists in the northwestern area of their control zone had retreated to the city of Donetsk, their de facto “capital,” which was also soon besieged by the ATO.

If the rate of Ukrainian victories continued unabated, the Ukrainian military would soon be in a position to isolate the separatists from Russia, which Kiev had maintained from outset was supplying them with fighters and materiel. In less than a month the ATO had drastically shrunk the size of the self-proclaimed “People’s Republics” of Donetsk and Lugansk, and were creeping up on the command centers of both.

Maxim Zmeyev/Reuters

These battlefield victories are crucial to understanding the context of the MH17 tragedy because all available evidence suggests that this is the exact period in which Moscow increased its direct support for its proxies in the area. By late August, the momentum of this war had quickly turned, the ATO was rapidly losing territory, and Kiev and Western governments declared that this was only made possible because of a massive influx of Russian military hardware—and conventional Russian soldiers. Indeed, the “Russian invasion” of eastern Ukraine became an established fact as of August 2014.

Among the weapons 'imported' from Russia to terrorists in the Eastern Ukraine in this period were advanced anti-aircraft systems including the Strela-10, Pantir-S1, and the Buk.

The Anti-Aircraft War

In November 2014, the weapons and munitions experts from Armament Research Services published the most comprehensive catalog of weapons used in this conflict to date. In the report, they note that advanced anti-aircraft systems like the Strela-10 (9k35) and 9k33 Osa were first seen in this conflict in early July. The influx of advanced anti-aircraft systems during this period corresponded to a growing number of Ukrainian aircraft that were shot down in combat.

Curiously, while most of the separatist weapons were supposedly captured from the Ukrainian military, these weapons showed up on Ukraine’ battlefields at a time when the Russian-backed fighters were on the defensive. So where were they captured from?

It was reportedly filmed on July 2, 2014. In that video, the Strela-10 is seen traveling on a road that is well-known to Ukraine researchers because the Buk missile launcher was seen traveling on it after MH17 was blown up 15 days later, but in the opposite direction and minus one missile.

The rate at which Kiev lost aircraft escalated quickly. According to ARES, from late April to early May, five Ukrainian helicopters were shot down near Slavyansk and Kramatorsk. However, soon the separatists began targeting Ukrainian military planes. On June 6 the Russian-backed fighters shot down their first fixed-wing aircraft, an Antonov An-30 surveillance craft northeast of Slavyansk, near Drobyshevo. On June 14, a Ukrainian Ilyushin Il-76 strategic airliner was shot down over Lugansk.

One month later, on July 14—three days before MH17’s immolation—a Ukrainian Antonov An-26 was downed over the Izvarino border crossing. Remarkably, Russian media reported that this aircraft was shot down by a Buk that had been captured weeks earlier from the Ukrainian military.

Our team at The Interpreter reported on the claim that separatists had captured a Buk, and pointed out that this story only ran on TV Zvezda, a network run by the Russian Defense Ministry. No other sources appeared to carry this newsworthy information except for a curious tweet from the Twitter fan account for Natalya Poklonskaya, the pro-Moscow Crimean prosecutor who became a celebrity after Russia’s Anschluss of the peninsula, saying the separatists had received some “cookies” in the form of the Buk. Was it possible, therefore, that TV Zvezda was already creating a cover story to explain how the Russian proxies managed acquire such a recherché Russian weapon?

On July 16, two new milestones were reached in what can feasibly be called the Ukraine-Russian War. First, a Ukrainian Sukhoi SU-25M1 close air support jet fighter was shot down over the border. In that incident, the spokesperson for the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council claimed that an air-to-air missile fired by one of Russia’s jets was likely responsible.

Second, The Interpreter was able to definitively document through geolocated YouTube videos that a group of Grad rocket launchers positioned on the Russian side of the border were firing into Ukrainian territory.

The Day Of On the morning of July 17, news surfaced that another plane, possibly a Ukrainian military cargo plane, had been shot down near Torez. Citizens and reporters near the crash site had already begun to post pictures and videos of the smoking debris. We now know that the only plane that crashed in this area was a civilian airliner, Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17.

The separatists, it seems, were also confused. A social media page associated with the then-military leader of the Russian-backed fighters, Colonel Igor Strelkov (aka Igor Girkin), took credit for the shooting down of an aircraft near Torez. At 17:50 Moscow time—approximately 30 minutes after the aircraft was struck but well before most of the world was aware that a civilian airliner had vanished from the sky—a group on the Russian social-networking site VKontakte called Strelkov’s Dispatches posted the boast of the downing of the plane  (with some of the same videos The Interpreter had already posted, used as corroborating evidence), adding: “We warned them—don’t fly ‘in our sky.’”

When the darker truth was eventually discovered, the post was deleted, although we had already captured screenshots. Titled “Report from the Militia,” it had in fact been copied from another forum where Strelkov was the moderator, called Antikvariat.ru, at 17:37 Moscow time.

While Strelkov’s Dispatches has been challenged as “inauthentic,” in fact it was used by Strelkov and other separatist leaders before July 17 and since to post official information about the war. It’s also been cited by Russian state media on several occasions and has never been disavowed by Strelkov personally. He continues to allow the group to use his name and likeness, despite the renaming of the VKontakte group the “Novorossiya Militia Dispatches.”

More revealing, the Russian media, including ITAR-TASS, RIA Novosti, and Vzglyad.ru, cited this forum and other sources that claimed the separatists had shot down a Ukrainian cargo plane—until, of course, it was learned that the crashed plane was a civilian airliner.

But Vzglyad.ru added another important detail:
“Ukrainian military claim that the losses were caused by actions by Russia. The militia refuted this information, correcting that they had shot down the plane from a ZRK ‘9K37M1’ (better known as a Buk).”

In Putin.War, Russian opposition leader Boris Nemtsov’s posthumously published report on Moscow’s military involvement in Ukraine, he points out that Russia’s ambassador to the United Nations, Vitaly Churkin, tried to excuse the fact that the separatists claimed responsibility for the attack thus:

Dominique Faget/AFP/Getty
“People from the east [of Ukraine] said that they had shot down a military plane. If they believed that they had shot down a military plane, it was confusion. If it was confusion, then it was not an act of terrorism.” In other words, a high-ranking Russian diplomat was trying to account for why separatists shot down MH17—a disclosure that, as we shall see, was ignored and then vehemently rejected by Churkin’s superiors.

The Missile

One problem was immediately apparent after MH17 was reduced to a scattered pile of wreckage. Details began to emerge about the altitude it was traveling at before it fell from the sky—33,000 feet.

Each anti-aircraft missile has a rating for how far away and how high it can hit a target. This relatively high altitude ruled out multiple missile systems that had so far been documented on the battlefield in Ukraine. But Associated Press journalist Peter Leonard reported after the incident that one of his reporters saw a Buk missile system moving through the town of Snezhnoye.

The Buk is capable of hitting targets more than twice as high as MH17 was traveling. Furthermore, as The Interpreter’s original report on the incident catalogs, multiple pictures, videos, and eyewitness reports have emerged that place the Buk missile launcher in several of the surrounding towns. A significant amount of evidence puts the Buk clearly within range of MH17 when the aircraft was hit.

The Incriminating Tweet

In the hours that followed the announcement that a civilian airliner, not a military cargo jet, had been destroyed, the Russian-backed separatists took several steps to hide some of their previous statements. As we noted above, the claim by “Strelkov’s Dispatches” that the pro-Russian fighters had shot down a Ukrainian plane with a Buk was removed. But it was not the only incriminating Internet post that was removed.

On June 29, the official Twitter account of the press office for the Donetsk People’s Republic had tweeted a picture of a Buk missile system that they said their troops were now controlling (the origin of the missile is left unclear in the language of the tweet). This tweet, too, got deleted, and when Time magazine reporter Simon Shuster later queried the separatist leadership about whether they ever possessed a Buk, they said they didn’t.

Separatists were perhaps too eager to claim that they, and not the Russian military, were responsible for the downing of what they assumed was another Ukrainian military plane—a media strategy that quickly backfired once it became clear that a commercial jet was hit.

In an interview with the radio station Echo of Moscow, Dmitry Muratov, the editor of the well-respected independent Russian newspaper Novaya Gazeta, said Alexander Boroday, the self-appointed head of the self-declared “Donetsk People’s Republic,” told Russian journalists that his troops shot down MH17. Muratov was vague about his sources for the story, suggesting that they were reporters for other news agencies. Muratov told the radio station: “I know that Alexander Boroday called the head of one of the main media organizations that covers events in Ukraine approximately 40 minutes after the Boeing perished and said, ‘Likely we shot down a civilian airline.’ I was told this and people talked about this whose words I am accustomed to taking seriously.”

Ukraine’s Intercepts

Eyewitness and journalist accounts placed a Buk near MH17 on July 17, and the Russian media and the separatists themselves acknowledged, in multiple outlets, that they shot down an aircraft—with a Buk. Notably, the Ukrainian government was also quick to adopt this narrative.

Only hours after the plane crashed, Kiev released what it said was a leaked audio recording, reportedly an intercepted phone call, reportedly between Igor Bezler (Bes, or “Demon”), a commander of the Russian-backed fighters, and Vasily Geranin, who is described as a colonel in the Russian Federation’s GRU (military intelligence). In that conversation, the two men confirm that “a plane has just been shot down” outside Enakievo, a town 62 miles northwest of Snezhnoye, by one of the separatist militias. After this, two men who are identified as “Major” and “Geek,” presumably two of the fighters, sound shocked as they learn that the plane was filled with civilians.

In a separate release by the Ukrainian Security Service (SBU) later in the day, another separatist leader, Mykola Kozitsin, reportedly has a conversation with one of his fighters in which he is audibly unnerved that a civilian airliner, not a Ukrainian cargo plane, that was shot down. “What the fuck were they flying in here for? There’s a war on,” a frustrated Kozitsin told the man on the other end of the line.

The next day, the SBU released another allegedly intercepted conversation, this time between a separatist commander and a GRU officer who goes by the callsign “Oreon.” In this exchange, which can be read in English here, the separatist commander says: “We already have the Buk and we will shoot them [Ukrainian military planes] down.” Oreon replies: “Yes, I know that.”

In the same release, a separate conversation between two separatist commanders can be heard in which the fighters admit that they have “received” a Buk anti-aircraft system and that it came “through the stripe”—code for the security cordon on the border between Russia and Ukraine.

On July 25, eight days after the downing of MH17, the SBU released a fourth audio tape that it claimed was recorded just two minutes prior to the Boeing’s being hit. A man the SBU identifies as Igor Bezler speaks to a man called Naymanets (“hired hand” in Russian). Naymanets tells Bezler that a “birdie” is flying in his direction.

Bezler: “A ‘birdie’ has flown to us?”
Naymanets: “Yes, one, for now.”
Bezler: “A scout or a big one?”
Naymanets: “It's not visible behind the clouds. It’s really high.” [Emphasis added.]
Bezler: “That it’s—I understand. Got it.”
Naymanets: “Uh-huh.”
Bezler: “Announce up top [‘report up the chain].”

The Russian government and the Russian-backed separatists have denied the authenticity of the tapes. Can they be authenticated?

The first clue that the tapes were real came from the speed with which they were released and the integrity of the details and narratives on them. The first two tapes were disclosed soon after MH17 was shot down; a third was released the next day, as the world struggled to piece together what had just happened and how. The tapes conform exactly to the narrative put forth by the Ukrainian government and are supported by a large body of empirical evidence.

But the most important confirmation of the tapes’ authenticity comes from none other than the separatists themselves.

Soon after the first audio leaks were released, and perhaps in a hurry to deny responsibility for an incident that had killed so many innocent civilians, Igor Bezler released a statement in which he admitted that it was indeed his voice on the recording with Geranin. But that conversation, Bezler insisted, happened before July 17, when a different plane was shot down. Bezler accused the SBU of editing the recording to make it sound like he was referring to MH17.

So Bezler confirms the authenticity of the conversation but denies its context. Yet in his confirmation is an important revelation: In his phone call with Geranin he describes a plane traveling over Enakievo, a town MH17 passed over before it was struck above Snezhnoye. This plane is described as flying at a high altitude (as was the one discussed between Bezler and Naymanets in the other intercepted conversation).

And yet according to the ARES analysis of all downed Ukrainian military aircraft until November 2014, no plane or helicopter was hit anywhere near Enakievo before July 17. (A MiG-29 fighter jet was downed close to the town on August 7.) Bezler cannot have been right in claiming that his conversation with Geranin occurred before MH17 was blown up.

Members of a group of international experts inspect wreckage at the site where the downed Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 crashed, near the village of Hrabove (Grabovo) in Donetsk region, eastern Ukraine August 1, 2014. International experts started recovery work at the wreckage site of the downed Malaysian airliner in east Ukraine on Friday despite clashes nearby between government forces and pro-Russian rebels.

Sergei Karpukhin/Reuters
Buk at the Scene of the Crime

Before we consider some of the more technical aspects of this incident, it’s worth considering a more basic fact. Before July 17, several anti-aircraft missiles were documented as being in the possession of the Russian-backed fighters. The earliest examples of these are shoulder-launched MANPADS, which are more than capable of shooting down low-flying aircraft such as helicopters. Some of the newest additions, as explained above, were vehicle-based systems like the Osa and the Strela-10. These weapons are far more advanced, capable of downing helicopters but really designed to shoot down faster-moving aircraft like ground-attack jets. The presence of these weapons could explain the destruction of some of the Ukrainian aircraft that were shot down earlier in July. But none of these weapons is capable of shooting down an aircraft flying as high as MH17 was on that fateful day.

The only weapon in the area capable of shooting down MH17 and spotted by journalists, dozens of eyewitnesses, and many videos and pictures taken by citizen journalists was the Buk.

Proof that at least one Buk missile launcher in Russian-backed terrorists possesion was within range of MH17 when the aircraft was shot down:
■     Journalists from the Associated Press saw a Buk missile launcher in Snezhnoye before MH17 was shot down.
■     In a detailed report, Roman Bochkala, a journalist for TV Inter in Ukraine, wrote that he witnessed the Russian-backed separatists in possession of a Buk missile system, driving in a convoy from Torez toward Snezhnoye.
■     A geolocated video posted on July 17, the day of the incident, shows a Buk missile launcher in the center of Snezhnoye, driving south.
■     The Guardian interviewed residents of Torez who positively identified the Buk missile launcher and said it traveled in a convoy toward Snezhnoye.
■     A geolocated picture shows a Buk launcher in Torez, moving in the direction of Snezhnoye. BuzzFeed journalists later visited Torez, confirmed the details of the picture, and spoke to residents who saw the Buk travel through the town toward Snezhnoye.
■     Journalists from Novaya Gazeta traveled to the area around the crash site and interviewed witnesses to the MH17 disaster. One resident of Grabovo, where MH17 actually crashed, claims a “‘ball’ flew at high speed from the southeast [from the direction of Snezhnoye]” and disappeared behind the clouds before an explosion was heard. Novaya Gazeta also interviewed citizens of Pervomaiskoye, just south of Snezhnoye, where some suspect the Buk actually fired the missile. The reports of these citizens—many of whom were afraid to talk for fear of repercussions from the separatists who still control the area—are confused and somewhat contradictory (more on this in a minute), but they all seem to agree that a projectile or projectiles fired from the ground shot down the aircraft.

There is also a clear pattern to the data. Before the missile launch, multiple eyewitnesses, journalists, pictures, and videos describe the Buk as moving from Torez toward Snezhnoye, and from there south toward Pervomaiskoye. We also see that some eyewitnesses described the missiles as flying from somewhere south of Snezhnoye. This theory is backed up by open-sourced forensics and investigations launched by journalists.

Photograph from Paris Match of the Buk missile launcher in Donetsk, Ukraine, July 17, 2014.

Screenshot from footage filmed in Zuhres, Ukraine, July 17, 2014.


Photograph from Torez, Ukraine, July 17, 2014.

A further clue about the launch site of the Buk was furnished by an obscure picture released by the Ukrainian government on July 18. Revealed later to have been taken by a Torez photographer from his roof, the image allegedly shows a smoke trail created by the missile as it traveled toward MH17.

The Ukraine at War blog was able to use landmarks in that picture to estimate where the picture was taken. The launch site, then, was somewhere south of Snezhnoye and west of Pervomaiskoye, just as was indicated by some of the eyewitnesses.

BuzzFeed’s Max Seddon confirmed where that picture was taken, from a vantage point looking toward the field in question. The Telegraph’s Roland Oliphant visited that field and found scorch marks on the ground, likely the backfire from a missile launcher, as well as other debris that suggests that Russian-backed separatists were operating there. Those reports match interviews conducted  by The Guardian’s Shaun Walker and others.

Ukraine at War then pinpointed the location of the possible launch site and compared satellite images taken three days after the incident with images taken before it to confirm that unusual tracks were visible in the fields, as if a tracked vehicle—perhaps a Buk—had traveled through the fields.

In December 2014, Dutch photographer Olaf Koens found the man who took the photo, and several others that were never published. Soon after, so did Russian blogger Sergei Parkhomenko, whose report was republished by Putin.War, the Nemtsov report. According to the photographer, he heard a loud missile launch, much louder than anything he had heard before, snapped a picture of the smoke trails, and then noticed the black smoke rising from the opposite direction, from Grabovo—the area where what was left of MH17 eventually crashed. This description matches exactly multiple other reports of the incident pieced together by various sources.

On on July 17, 2014 a Buk missile launcher, originating from the 53rd Brigade near Kursk, Russia, travelled from Donetsk to Snizhne. It was then unloaded and drove under its own power to a field south of Snizhne, where at approximately 4:20 pm it launched a surface-to-air missile that hit Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 as it flew over Ukraine. On the morning of July 18, the Buk missile launcher was driven from Luhansk, Ukraine, across the border to Russia.

EXACT location pinpointed of MH17 missile launch site

Journalist Roland Oliphant read my blog where I calculated the possible site of the missile launch. See the blog.

This is how that looked like:

Прямая ссылка на встроенное изображение

The Story Told by Debris

Investigators have access to an even more definitive forensic body of evidence—the debris field from the aircraft.

The Buk has a very different signature than many other types of missiles. Infrared tracking missiles, like the Strela-10, fire a missile that is attracted to the heat-generating engines and explodes on contract. Similarly, infrared homing air-to-air missiles fired by aircraft also target the engines.

Not so with the Buk, which uses radar-proximity missiles. These missiles travel toward the target and then explode when they get within adequate range. The explosions send fragmentation into the targeted aircraft, often ripping it apart. A defense analyst with IHS Jane’s noted that the pattern of damage seen on the fuselage of the plane was consistent with the theory that a Buk surface-to-air missile was used. A ballistics expert and lecturer at ANU Strategic Defence Studies Centre, Stephan Fruhling, agreed, noting that the damage was consistent with a fragmentation device such as a Buk, not a weapon such as an air-to-air missile, which targets the engines and does not send fragmentation rounds into the aircraft. A spokesperson for the SBU noted that some of the bodies of the victims of MH17 contained metal fragments not consistent with the aircraft itself. A journalist for Dutch broadcaster RTLNieuws discovered a fragment at the crash site that arms experts say is part of the explosive charge of a Buk missile.

Indeed, the Russian state-operated manufacturer of the Buk, Almaz-Antey, claims that a Buk was responsible for the shooting down of MH17, although it claims the missile was fired from Ukrainian government-held territory (a theory we will examine in a moment).

Perhaps most critically, the Dutch Safety Board’s initial investigation stated that the aircraft was “penetrated by a large number of high-energy objects” which “originated from outside the fuselage,” a description consistent with a Buk. This week sources working with the official Dutch investigation conducted by the Dutch Safety Board told CNN that their official findings will definitively say that a Russian Buk, fired from territory controlled by Russian-backed fighters, shot down MH17.

Russian Disinformation

There have been two alternative theories put forth by the Russian government. The first is that a Ukrainian Su-25 fired an air-to-air missile at MH17 and the second that a Buk fired from ATO-monitored terrain shot down the airliner.

The Su-25 theory was put forth by the Russian government four days after the grim event (but after significant, often contradictory, and widely conspiratorial speculation by the Russian state-owned media). It was immediately dismissed by experts who pointed out that the Su-25 is not capable of flying the flight plan described by the Russian government nor, in all likelihood, was it capable of shooting down a plane flying at over 33,000 feet. Furthermore, the Dutch Safety Board’s initial finding was that the missile which shot down MH17 exploded “from above the level of the cockpit floor,” not at the engines or below the aircraft, which is what we would expect to see from missiles fired by a Su-25. As the investigative bloggers at the citizen journalist website Bellingcat noted the problems with this theory are legion.

Even the Russian government seemed to abandon this line of thinking quickly. Engineers for the Russian manufacturer of the Buk missile claimed that, yes, the airliner was shot down by a Buk, but the specific missile in question is not used by Russia, and the missile that was used was not fired from near Snezhnoye, but rather from Zaroshchenskoye, territory controlled by the Ukrainian government.
All of these points were debunked.

The first problem with the engineer’s report: Even the separatists claimed at the time that Zaroshchenskoye was controlled by the Russian-backed fighters, not the Ukrainian military.

The second problem: Novaya Gazeta’s Pavel Kanygin went to both Zaroshchenskoye and the area around the MH17 crash site. While those near the crash site gave contradictory and somewhat confusing statements, they did see a surface-to-air missile fired at MH17, while no one interviewed in Zaroshchenskoye saw either the Ukrainian military nor a Buk missile launcher.

The third problem: The missile in question is used by the Russian military, and multiple missiles of this variety were documented in convoys moving on the Russian side of the border close to Ukraine.

The core absurdity with Moscow’s alternative theories—conspiracy theories, really—is even more basic. The Ukrainian government, citing intelligence sources, swiftly put forth a narrative whereby a Buk missile launcher was transported from the Russian border to the area where MH17 was downed; then the missile was fired and destroyed the civilian airliner before the launcher was evacuated back across the Russian border.

The Ukrainian narrative has been consistent from the start, and although Kiev made at least one mistake in its initial press release, a significant body of subsequent evidence supports this narrative. The Kremlin narrative, on the other hand, has been ever-changing, woefully substantiated, and largely contradictory—and many of the various theories put forth by its surrogates in the state-controlled media have been risible.
Who’s to Blame?

How did the separatists get a Buk anti-aircraft missile? Did they capture one from the Ukrainian military, or were they given a Buk by the Russian government? Is it even possible that Russian soldiers pulled the trigger?

The first key to answering this question is to track the movement of the Buk on the morning on July 17, 2014. In The Interpreter’s first comprehensive report on this issue we published a timeline of events that combines our own work with a timeline posted by the Associated Press, which also includes claims from the Ukrainian intelligence assessment. An updated version is below:
■     01:05—Buk enters Ukraine on flatbed truck. (AP—Ukrainian counterterrorism chief Vitaly Nayda)
■     09:00—Buk reaches Donetsk, disembarks flatbed truck. (AP—Ukrainian counterterrorism chief Vitaly Nayda). A picture of the Buk was taken that places it in Donetsk at approximately 11 a.m. (read more on this here.)
■     Approximately 11:40—Picture places Buk in Zuhres, between Donetsk and Torez. (Bellingcat)
■     Approximately 12:00 to 13:00—Social media posts place Buk in Torez, then moving toward Snezhnoye. (Bellingcat)
■     Approximately lunchtime—Buk reaches Karapetyan Street in Snezhnoye. (AP—eyewitnesses)
■     13:05—AP journalists see Buk moving through Snezhnoye in convoy with two civilian cars. This was reported by AP before MH17 was shot down. (AP)
■     16:18—Intercepted audio released by Ukrainian SBU has separatist commander Igor Bezler speaking, told by rebel spotter that a “birdie” flying “really high” was moving into range. (The Interpreter)
■     16:20—Locals in Snezhnoye report one or two loud blasts. One minute to a minute and a half later, a second blast is heard. MH17 falls from the sky after this. (AP)
■     16:33—Intercepted phone call has separatists realizing that they shot down a civilian airliner, not a military transport plane. (The Interpreter)
■     16:40—An intercepted phone call has Bezler speaking to Vasily Geranin, who is described as a colonel in the Russian Federation’s GRU, indicating that an aircraft has been shot down. There is a discrepancy with the time stamp since only one aircraft was shot down in this area. Bezler says it was “30 minutes ago,” but it was really only 20 minutes earlier. (The Interpreter)
■     16:50—The VKontakte community “Strelkov’s Dispatches” posts a report “from the militia” about the downing of “an AN-26″ in the “region of Torez.” (The Interpreter)
■     17:14-17:42—Separatists see that the wreckage of the what they shot down is indeed a civilian aircraft, not a military one. The “Mayor” admits that they have shot down a “a super big civilian craft,” and a separatist reports “fragments right in the yards” and “civilian stuff, medicine, toilet paper, towels.”
■     17:18—Pro-Kremlin outlet Vzglyad.ru reports separatists taking credit for downing “an AN-26” (actually MH17) with a Buk; admissions of possession of Buks also covered on July 14. (The Interpreter)
■     Approximately 20:00-21:00—Video released by the Ukrainian government shows a Buk, missing one missile, in Lugansk on the road to Krasnodon, which leads to a key border crossing, likely approximately at sunset.
■     02:00-04:00 on July 18—The Buk launchers reportedly cross the border into Russia. (Ukrainian government)


Even more evidence has come to light since that fleshes out the Buk’s travels before and after MH17 was shot down. The investigative bloggers at Bellingcat were able to analyze a photograph, originally published by Paris Match, which places the Buk in Donetsk at approximately 11 a.m on July 17. The numbering on the side of the Buk in that picture, 3x2, with the “x” being a missing number, matches precisely a video of a Buk located in Stary Oskol, Russia, on June 23. Other investigations by Bellingcat suggest that the vehicles in the June 23 convoy were part of Russia’s 53rd Anti-Aircraft Missile Brigade.

There is another far more basic reason to believe that the Russian military either directly controlled the missile that shot down MH17 or helped the separatists conduct the attack: the sheer complexity of the weapon, which mere “volunteers” could not operate by themselves. (See The Aviationist for a brief view of how complex the controls for this weapons system are.)

Evidence Still Emerging

Though MH17 was destroyed one year ago laast Friday, even more new evidence is coming to light. News Corp Australia has just released a new video that shows the Russian-backed fighters arriving at the scene of the crash site. In the video, the voice of a rebel commander can be heard issuing orders and communicating with other Russian-backed fighters by both radio and phone. He arrives at the scene expecting to find the remains of a Ukrainian Su-25 fighter jet that he seems to believe his troops have just shot down. Instead, he finds nothing but a civilian airliner.

News Corp also says that their investigation has unearthed evidence that the locals on the ground were being instructed to say that a Ukrainian jet shot down the civilian airliner.

The video is disturbing. Russian-backed fighters rummage through the luggage of the recently deceased in search for the aircraft’s black boxes and other identifiable paperwork and USB sticks. The commander continues to repeat that “they [the Ukrainians] brought down the passenger plane [with a fighter jet] and we brought down the fighter.” The problem—there is no fighter. This commander's troops have just shot down a civilian aircraft, a fact that begins to dawn on them over the course of the 17-minute video.

The commander can be heard off camera saying: “They say the Sukhoi [fighter] brought down the civilian plane and ours brought down the fighter…But where is the Sukhoi? There it is…it’s the passenger plane.”

Source: http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/07/17/how-we-know-russia-shot-down-mh17.html

Real facts about the Muslim population in Europe.

Originally posted by lorddreadnought at Real facts about the Muslim population in Europe.

Recent killings in Paris as well as the arrival of hundreds of thousands of mostly Muslim refugees in Europe have drawn renewed attention to the continent’s Muslim population. In many European countries, including France, Belgium, Germany, the United Kingdom and the Netherlands, concerns about growing Muslim communities have led to calls for restrictions on immigration. But just how large is Europe’s Muslim population, and how fast is it growing?

Using the Pew Research Center’s most recent population estimates, here are five facts about the size and makeup of the Muslim population in Europe:

1. Germany and France have the largest Muslim populations among European Union member countries. As of 2010, there were 4.8 million Muslims in Germany (5.8% of the country’s population) and 4.7 million Muslims in France (7.5%). In Europe overall, however, Russia’s population of 14 million Muslims (10%) is the largest on the continent.

2. The Muslim share of Europe’s total population has been increasing steadily. In recent decades, the Muslim share of the population throughout Europe grew about 1 percentage point a decade, from 4% in 1990 to 6% in 2010. This pattern is expected to continue through 2030, when Muslims are projected to make up 8% of Europe’s population.

3. Muslims are younger than other Europeans. In 2010, the median age of Muslims throughout Europe was 32, eight years younger than the median for all Europeans (40). By contrast, the median age of religiously unaffiliated people in Europe, including atheists, agnostics and those with no religion in particular, was 37. The median age of European Christians was 42.

4. Views of Muslims vary widely among European countries. A Pew Research Center survey conducted this spring found that majorities in France, Britain and Germany had favorable views of Muslims. Opinion was on balance favorable in Spain while negative views prevailed in Italy and Poland. Views about Muslims are tied to ideology. While 36% of Germans on the political right give Muslims an unfavorable rating, just 15% on the left do so. The gap between left and right is also roughly 20 percentage points in France and Italy. And significant differences are found in the UK as well.

5. As of 2010, the European Union was home to about 13 million Muslim immigrants. The foreign-born Muslim population in Germany is primarily made up of Turkish immigrants, but also includes many born in Kosovo, Iraq, Bosnia-Herzegovina and Morocco. The roughly 3 million foreign-born Muslims in France are largely from France’s former colonies of Algeria, Morocco and Tunisia.

CORRECTION: An earlier version of this post cited a 2014 Ipsos MORI poll on peoples’ perceptions about the size of the Muslim population in European countries. The reference was deleted because the poll was conducted through an online panel for which the participants are recruited in a way that does not allow us to know each respondent’s chance of being selected.

Source: http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/11/17/5-facts-about-the-muslim-population-in-europe/

Shocking truth. Kremlin funds French National Front and some other Far-right movements in Europe.

Originally posted by lorddreadnought at Shocking truth. Kremlin funds French National Front and some other Far-right movements in Europe.

The €9m (£7m) that French rising star of politics Front National (FN) borrowed from a Russian lender may be just the tip of the iceberg, as fresh reports indicate that Marine Le Pen's party is in talks with a Kremlin-linked bank to get the staggering figure of €40m in total.

The first report of a deal with Moscow-based banks raised concern among some commentators worried over possible foreign intrusion into French politics and comes at a time of increasing tension between Moscow and the West over the situation in Ukraine.

FN, which made a dramatic breakthrough in the French parliament and topped the European polls, has based its success on an anti-immigration, Euro-sceptic agenda, appealing to an anti-establishment electorate.

Banks in France have been unwilling to lend money to political parties since Nicolas Sarkozy was fined €500,000 for undisclosed expenses in his 2012 presidential bid.

It is no big surprise that Marine Le Pen, who visited Moscow and Kremlin on several occasions since taking over from her father, is seeking Russian support, despite antifascist and pro-Israel rhetoric of Vladimir Putin. At a time when relationships between the European Union and the Kremlin are at an all-time low, with economic and diplomatic sanctions imposed on Russian businessmen and lawmakers, Le Pen's party described Putin as a "patriot" and criticised EU bureaucrats for rekindling the Cold War with the superpower. She also mentioned that Ukraine and some other countries in the Eastern Europe should not be part of European Union.

According to Mediapart, Le Pen travelled personally to Moscow on a secret trip in February to seal the loan with FRCB. On that occasion, she was allegedly introduced to nationalist MP Alexander Babakov, who has been blacklisted by the EU for his support of a Russian bill on the annexation of Crimea.

Moldova-born Babakov, 51, who acted as middleman in the FN's loan deal, owns at least €11m of real estate in France with his wife, Irina Babakova.

Le Pen is not the only fake far-right European politician supporting the strongman Putin. The Kremlin, on its part, is eager to fuel anti-EU sentiment in old Europe to leverage key support in easing economic and diplomatic sanctions against Russia.

Far-right Freedom Party's leader of Austria, Heinz-Christian Strache, condemned European policy urging Brussels to "stop playing the stooge of the US in the encirclement of Russia". The party has been accused of receiving Russian money.

Similar comments came from Geert Wilders, the leader of the Islamophobe Dutch Freedom Party, who blamed the EU-Russia tensions on "shameless Europhiles with their dreams of empire".

Hungary's far-right Jobbik party has also been accused of cashing in Kremlin money. Can you imagine that Jobbik or Front National will return borrowed money? I can't believe in that. But I can believe that this fake nationalist movements will serve Kremlin and it's antifascist, pro-israel agenda till the last breath. As we can see Kremlin jewry and zionists can easilly corrupt nationalist movements as well. So, be aware of who you trust.

Source: http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/russia-loan-marine-le-pens-front-national-does-murky-deal-kremlin-bank-1477135

Marine Le Pen’s rhetoric is convincing French jews and gays to trust the Front National.

Originally posted by lorddreadnought at Marine Le Pen’s rhetoric is convincing French jews and gays to trust the Front National.

Marine Le Pen’s rhetoric is convincing French Jews and gays to trust the Front National

A report in today’s Times suggests that French Jews and gays are ready to discard their long-standing distrust for the Far Right and vote for the Front National. In January, Rachel Halliburton described how Marine Le Pen’s public condemnation of anti-Semitism had won her votes, as had her insistence that the party was the only one that defends secularity and democracy against Islamisation. A key part of her strategy has been to use the threat of radical Islam to court the sort of people that the far right has traditionally persecuted, including the gay community and the Jewish community. 

That gay men now feel comfortable with the Front National is the result of a deliberate effort by its leader, Marine Le Pen, who has pursued a programme of detoxification (the French term is ‘de-diabolisation’) ever since she took control of the party in 2011.

Her father, Jean Marie Le Pen, who led the FN from its founding in 1972 until Marine took over, described homosexuality as a ‘biological and social anomaly’. In the 1980s he argued that all individuals with Aids should be kept in isolation, and in the 1990s was still declaring that ‘There are no queens in the National Front.’

By contrast, Marine has worked hard to expand the FN’s membership beyond obvious bigots, racists and skinheads. She has publicly condemned anti-Semitism and insists that, far from being racist, her party is the only one that defends secularity and democracy against Islamisation.

A key part of this strategy is using the Islamist threat to court the sort of people that the far right has traditionally persecuted. It’s working. In the 2012 presidential elections, Le Pen won 13.5 per cent of the Jewish vote. A surprising enough statistic, but her appeal to gay activists has created even more waves. Just before Christmas, her deputy Florian Philippot was outed as gay by Closer: the same magazine that exposed Hollande’s affair with Julie Gayet. Around the same time, Le Pen appointed a new adviser: Sébastien Chenu, one of the founders of the activist organisation GayLib. FN traditionalists complained loudly that their party was being taken over by a gay cabal. (Those complaining included Marine’s 25-year-old niece, Marion Maréchal-Le Pen, an MP and a rising star in the party.)

Source: http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2015/02/marine-le-pen-is-winning-frances-gay-vote-and-its-jewish-one/

Kremlin was behind the crash of Airbus A321 (Metrojet Flight 9268) with its death toll of 224 people

Originally posted by lorddreadnought at Kremlin was behind the crash of Airbus A321 (Metrojet Flight 9268) with its death toll of 224 people

The bombing was an attempt to 'kill two rabbits with one bullet' as it allowed Russia to bomb Bashar al-Assad's enemies in Syria while bringing Moscow back into the international community.

On a sultry night at Sharm el-Sheikh, one of the most popular tourist destinations in the Middle East, events were much the same as any evening. Passengers’ tickets at the airport were scanned and passports stamped. People dozed on chairs; babies cried.

Outside, taxi-drivers loitered as chartered flights arrived or thundered away into the sky. One such departure early that morning on October 31 was Metrojet Flight 9268, taking Russian tourists home to St Petersburg from holidays on the Red Sea.

The Russian captain, a veteran called Valery Yurievich Nemov, had 12,000 hours of experience. The safety logs were up to date, though there had been previous damage to the aircraft when the tail was damaged — and repaired — in 2001.

Former KGB agent Boris Karpichkov believes Russian president Vladimir Putin was behind the bombing.

As the aircraft taxied shortly before 4am, there were 217 passengers on board, with seven crew. Take-off went smoothly. The plane climbed to a cruising altitude of 31,000ft, and was 23 minutes into its flight, heading north over the Sinai peninsula. Then the nightmare happened.

A shattering explosion towards the rear of the plane effectively split the aircraft in two and it crashed to the ground.

Bodies were found — many still strapped into their seats — scattered over a 30-mile radius 31,000 feet below where the aircraft broke up in the sky.

Experts say there would have been a ‘hurricane-like’ decompression ripping through the plane from back to front, tearing anything — and anybody — not strapped down into a maelstrom of airborne objects flying through the cabin.

Some of those aboard died of hypoxia — loss of oxygen — while many others were killed on impact with the ground. But the injuries suffered by those at the back of the plane were markedly different from those at the front. According to Russian sources, passengers in the front section suffered ‘blunt trauma of the chest, abdomen and pelvis, with multiple fractures to the upper and lower limbs and trauma to the internal organs’.

They add that passengers seated at the rear of the aircraft suffered ‘explosive trauma with multiple burns over 90 per cent of their soft tissues’, while their bodies had been peppered with shrapnel.

All the 224 passengers and crew died after the plane exploded at 31,000 feet just 23 minutes after departing

Islamic fanatics soon claimed responsibility for this horrific act of mass murder, subsequently publishing a photograph of a drinks can concealing a timer and explosives, which the extremists claimed had been smuggled on to the aircraft, and detonated after it took off.

Yet, intriguingly, the extremists initially seemed to have as little detail about what actually happened as authorities on the ground, who, in the first hours after the disaster, were unsure of the cause.

Instead, in a brief and strikingly vague statement, IS condemned ‘Russian crusaders’ for their involvement in Syria, and warned that infidels ‘neither have safety in the lands of Muslims nor in their air’ and that ‘soldiers of the Caliphate were able to down a Russian airplane over Sinai province’.

If anything, the implication seemed to be that they had shot down the plane from the ground, not sabotaged it with a bomb.

What’s not in dispute is that the atrocity prompted an extraordinary, seismic shift in world politics between former foes.

Even though sanctions had been imposed on the Moscow regime over its intervention in Ukraine, David Cameron immediately made efforts to improve relations with Russia by phoning President Vladimir Putin to tell him that the British people ‘shared the pain and grief’ of the Russian people.

Putin was said to have been ‘gladdened’ by the call, and welcomed Cameron’s offer to help Russia track down the perpetrators, as other world powers — including France, Germany and China — pledged their solidarity with Russia over the outrage.

Islamic fanatics soon claimed responsibility for the atrocity, but it provided a seismic shift in world politics.

Public opinion, both in Russia and internationally, swung behind Putin after he swore to take ruthless revenge on Islamic State. Moscow started bombing Syria (where ISIS is taking on the ruling Bashar al-Assad government) within days of the aircraft being downed.

But is all really as it seems over the story of Metrojet Flight 9268? Could there be another very disturbing explanation of how the aircraft was blown out of the sky?
One man certainly believes so: Boris Karpichkov, a former spy with the KGB (later renamed the FSB) who now lives under a new identity with his wife and family at a secret location in England after fleeing here in fear for his life.

His sensational claim at first seems unbelievable. For he maintains it was the Kremlin, not ISIS, that deliberately blew the plane out of the sky.

And he says Putin cynically authorised the tragedy not only to obtain worldwide sympathy at a time when Russia was being treated as a pariah because of its aggression towards Ukraine, but also to gain support for its ostensible belligerence against ISIS, which Putin would use as a cover to attack rebel groups in Syria who were sworn enemies of his ally President al-Assad.

Of course, this could simply be the most monstrous slur by a deeply disenchanted man. For it has to be said that Major Karpichkov fell out with his KGB paymasters over money he claimed was owed to him, and ended up in jail before fleeing to Britain.

Yet his case deserves to be aired, particularly in view of the history of black propaganda emanating from Putin and his Kremlin cronies, and his argument is compelling.

Relatives grieve Russian plane crash in Egypt's Sinai.

Major Karpichov claimed the bombing was an attempt to 'kill two rabbits with one bullet' as it allowed Russia to bomb Bashar al-Assad's enemies in Syria while bringing Moscow back into the international community.

The major claims his information comes from a general lieutenant in GRU (one of Russia’s numerous military intelligence wings).

This man told him, he says, that around the time of the plane’s crash, Putin had been expressing his concerns to Kremlin allies about ‘possible losses of political influence’ in Syria and the Middle East. Putin, he went on, was worried about the fate of his traditional ally in the region, President al-Assad, given the West’s support for rebel groups trying to depose him.

A plan was allegedly hatched by officials within GRU to reverse Russia’s declining influence in the region and — as Major Karpichkov claims he was told by a senior source — to ‘kill two rabbits with one bullet’.

The aim was to get ‘at least silent international approval’ for massive military operations against Assad’s enemies under the guise of a campaign against the IS terrorists blamed for bombing the Russian passenger jet; and to bolster Russia’s multi-billion-pound weapons business with the Middle East.

This was all summarised in a dossier compiled by the former KGB spy: ‘In order to accomplish all these aims and to get Western consent to fighting Islamic State (which was, essentially, official support for keeping the Assad regime in power), the Kremlin desperately needed the kind of justification which would generate worldwide attention and full international sympathy and approval for military action.’

The major certainly knows all about the dark arts of espionage.

A graduate of a KGB academy in Minsk, he was taught how to kill with his bare hands as well as how to carry out other so-called ‘wet-jobs’ — the killing of a target without leaving any traces of evidence.

Major Karpichov used four passports to flee house arrest in Latvia before making it to London where he lives under an assumed name with his wife and family, however he claims to still have sources within the GRU.

He served in Russian intelligence for more than a decade, reaching the rank of KGB major and, as such, was privy to Kremlin secrets at a high level. He spent much of his career in the then Soviet republic of Latvia, where he specialised in counter-intelligence for the KGB.

When the Soviet empire collapsed in 1991, he stayed in newly independent Latvia, where he joined the country’s intelligence services. But he also remained on the books of the Kremlin, leaking information to his old bosses.

However, he was jailed for two months on weapons charges after a row over payments he claimed were owed to him by the KGB. The Russians, in turn, accused him of being involved in a massive fraud — part of the normal modus operandi of the Kremlin bringing criminal charges against enemies.

After he was placed under house arrest in Lativa, he used four false passports issued to him while he was a spy and fled the country, ending up in Britain a decade ago.
He says he retains high-level contacts in Russian intelligence circles, and that his dossier is an accurate representation of the truth about the worst terrorist atrocity involving an airliner since the terror attacks in New York on September 11, 2001.

The file states that Russian intelligence ‘geniuses’ in GRU outlined a plan to Putin and his closest aides to bomb a Russian airliner and blame it on Islamic extremists ‘to initiate enormous international hate towards ISIS and to create international sympathy to act on its own without any limits or reservations (for military action).’

The bomb, according to the claim, was designed to vilify ISIS while bringing sympathy to Russia

Once agreed, Major Karpichkov says, the operation was straightforward.
A specialist in ‘wet-jobs’ and other forms of espionage was despatched to Sharm el-Sheikh, where hundreds of thousands of Russians holiday each year to escape the cold. Posing as a fighter who was recuperating in the Red Sea after serving in Ukraine, the agent befriended a young Russian woman staying in the resort, and began a holiday romance.

When the woman was due to leave for St Petersburg, the Russian agent gave her a ‘present’ — asking her to deliver it to his parents at home in Russia — and escorted her through the notoriously lax security at Sharm el-Sheikh airport before she boarded the doomed Metrojet flight in the early hours of the morning.

The gift, says Major Karpichkov, was a bomb and the detonator used to ignite the explosives was known as an EHV-7, which is produced exclusively for special forces soldiers. The device itself looked like a piece of plumbing tube, which is primed to explode by an electrolyte ‘bath’ slowly corroding a metallic wire, which detonates the bomb once it is broken.

The explosive material was — sources add — cyclonite, an enormously powerful substitute for TNT.

It has been suggested that the bomb was most likely placed under the seat 30A or 31A. Plane records show that seat 30A was occupied by Nadezhda Bashakova, 77, from Volkhov in St Petersburg region, travelling with her daughter Margarita Simanova, 43, who sat in 30B. In seat 31A was Maria Ivleva, 15, also from St Petersburg region. Could this young woman have been be the unwitting carrier of the bomb? She was with her mother Marina Ivleva, 44, who occupied seat 31B. My sources say the bomb carrier was older, and sitting nearby.

The terror attack was designed to allow Russia international approval to bomb al-Assad's enemies in Syria.

However extraordinary, the allegations about the Sinai crash are not as far-fetched as they may seem. After all, Putin has allegedly used such a murderous method against his own people to generate support for war before. In 1999, during Putin’s first term as president after coming to power following a career as a KBG spy, he was accused of being behind the infamous bombings of four apartment blocks in Moscow as well as the cities of Buynaksk and Volgodonsk.

Within 24 hours of a series of explosions ripping through the apartment blocks, killing 307 civilians, including women and children, and injuring more than 1,700 more, Putin had blamed Islamic fighters in Chechnya — and launched a devastating air assault on the region.

According to Putin and his loyalists, the bombing was ordered by Islamist warlords, who were trying to wreak havoc among the Russian population. Yet, even as Putin was going to war against his enemies in Chechnya, three Kremlin spies were arrested by local police who accused them of planting the devices.

At the same time, another bomb plot was foiled and Russian police traced suspicious calls, in which ‘terrorists’ discussed the atrocity, to a number in Moscow. It turned out to belong to the FSB (state security).

Other suspects arrested for the bombing campaign were later released after showing their FSB official identification cards.

Even more damning, it transpired that a Russian official had expressed his condolences about the apartment building bombings in an official speech to a council meeting — three days before any of the explosions.

A special parliamentary commission was set up to investigate the plot in 2000. While Putin’s government refused to co-operate with the inquiry, two members of the commission were killed in apparent assassinations, and its senior lawyer was jailed.

However, critics claim that Karpichokov has made up the claims in order to embarrass the Kremlin.

The commission later blamed Islamists and Chechen separatists for the apartment bombings.

Yet Alexander Litvinenko, the former KGB spy who fled to Britain and was later murdered by two Russian agents, also alleged — along with several other former Putin allies — that the apartments were blown up on the Kremlin’s orders to win public support for a war in Chechnya.

Soon after making these and other allegations about Putin, Litvinenko was poisoned by Russian agents who slipped polonium 210 — a deadly radioactive substance — into his tea during a meeting at the Millennium Hotel in London’s Grosvenor Square. He died in agony several weeks later.

Not surprisingly, the Russians have furiously dismissed the claims by their former spy.

Source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3374231/Did-Putin-plant-holiday-jet-bomb-killed-224-Russians-s-outrageous-theory-ex-KGB-agent-claims-dossier-proves-Kremlin-orchestrated-atrocity-justify-waging-war-Syria-decide-yourself.html#ixzz3vpGIYaVi

For how long would Western nationalists and right-wingers consider Putin a “Russian Nationalist”?

Originally posted by lorddreadnought at For how long would Western nationalists and right-wingers consider Putin a “Russian Nationalist”?

For how long would Western nationalists and right-wingers consider Putin a “Russian Nationalist” or “The Leader of the Free World”?

No one in the nationalist or conservative movement should harbor any illusions regarding the corrupt, grotesquely hypocritical, bureaucratic and police-state nature of the modern state authority and ideology existing in the Russian Federation. The single most important thing to understand is that this system is explicitly and purposefully anti-Russian.

Russian and zionist media presents a public image of Putin as a Christian faith defender and Russian patriot, who fights against corruption, oligarchy and globalist forces.

Still, Putin’s image is full of lies and deception. This image was created to placate the Russian people who have nationalist or conservative views. In reality, Putin is the leader and strong supporter of Russian oligarchs and corrupted officials, he also openly supports Israel, praises USSR and Stalin, defends multiculturalism inside his country and openly opposes "nationalism, neo-fascism, and anti-Semitism".

In 1998, Putin was director of FSB (former KGB) and served the government ruled by president Boris Yeltsin. He plotted for the fall of General Prosecutor Yury Skuratov, who persecuted Jewish oligarchs and was investigating Yeltsin for corruption. Skuratov was blackmailed and forced to renounce using a video taken in a FSB house where the man appears having sex with two prostitutes. In 1999, Putin was designated Prime Minister and then President by Yeltsin who retired this year. The first presidential decree that Putin signed, on 31 December 1999, was titled "On guarantees for former president of the Russian Federation and members of his family". This ensured that "corruption charges against the outgoing President and his relatives" would not be pursued.

Oligarchs are not in jail where they belong, instead they are partners with Putin. If someone going to praise and worship Putin’s policy against oligarchs, at least stick to the precise facts: 1 (ONE) Jewish oligarch was in jail, not oligarchs (plural). Nobody "kicked out" Jewish oligarchs, there are still many of them remaining. Putin appointed many Jewish oligarchs to statesmanship positions. The few rich Jews did leave, but it was far from all of them.  During the 2014 Sochi Olympics, Putin's childhood jewish friend Arkady Rotenberg, already one of the richest men in Russia, was awarded $7 billion of deals by Putin.

Although we cannot exclude that Putin and his close jewish circle dream about their ‘empire’, there won’t be any place in their Khazar ‘empire’ for the Russian spirit and Russian ideology, just as there was no place for Russianness in the Soviet Union. Remember that the process of destroying the Russian nation and Russian worldview, unprecedented in its scale and consequences, was launched precisely in the Soviet Union and the current authorities of Russian Federation carry on this process more or less consistently. The Russian culture and the Church were being destroyed in the USSR. Internationalism and inter-racial marriages were promoted. The USSR has done everything possible to make people to identify themselves not as Russians, but as Soviet people. All the facts show that it is the USSR and not the old Russia that serves as a role model for the current Russian authorities. They are building a post-Soviet state and not in any way a Russian national state.

The main supports for the Kremlin authorities in their anti-Russian enterprise are the security agencies. Their purpose is to suppress any popular protest and discontent by unlawful use of force — simply because it is impossible to do it by lawful methods. It is not a coincidence that today the members of the security agencies and not regular officials or manufacturers who get the most of benefits and opportunities.

Kremlin’s goal is to create in place of Russia and Russian civilization a new supranational pseudo- empire within the framework of the New World Order. Under the guidance of a Jewish elite, the Russian majority will be gradually replaced by Asian migrants. Of course, they cannot acknowledge this openly as it will cause mass protests and they will be quickly swept away. So for the people’s consumption they have an official ideology of building a society of prosperity, social justice and interethnic peace. Yet they cannot hide the truth, especially from those who have access to objective information. As a result, the silence of the ruling circles is bought by enormous material benefits on one hand, and by intimidation on the other. In this light, it is easy to understand the murders of generals Lebed and Rokhlin, Governor Evdokimov and many others who had ascended to the political Olympus in Russia but had not become completely loyal to those forces that control and deliberately destroy our country as the heart of Russian civilization. I think that the mysterious death of General Shebarshin, the last chief of the KGB, is in the same line of political murders.

Multiculturalism (‘multinationality’) is the official Putin ideology. Ten years ago there were virtually no alien migrants in Russia. Now there are 15 millions of them, mostly Central Asians — 10% of the total population. Most of them are males of military age. In Moscow they commit around a half of all violent crimes. Russian authorities do not even try to hide the fact that their goal is to alter the national and cultural composition of Russian population by means of importation and legalization of huge numbers of culture- and civilization-wise alien people, mainly from undeveloped Third World countries.  Moscow is no longer a Russian city.

Putin has overseen the biggest influx of non-whites into Russia since the days of the Mongol occupation. Millions of Azeris, Tajiks, Chinese, Chechens, Afghans and Kurds. This is something even left wingers and anti-Russians do not deny - the wave of non-white immigration in the last decade Russia became the second most popular destination for non-white immigrants on the planet. Moscow alone has something like a million Azeris, hundreds of thousands Chechens plus Chinese, as well as 'Europe's Curse', black Africans. ... Though the Russia’s media report only interracial crimes involved skinhead and poor innocent immigrants!

Now not a single month passes without some minor ethnic riot occurring in some part of the country, triggered by the depressingly similar scenario: a migrant kills a Russian, police either let the murderer go or don’t do anything, local authorities blame Russians for xenophobia, locals arise and protest. This is in fact good development as Russians learn that only rioting makes authorities listen. Unfortunately, as a result, the most active members of such events then go to prison.

Western media completely ignore that for each persecuted Pussy Riot member there are thousands of Russian men persecuted for as little as derogatory remarks about migrants made in social networks. However, you have heard nothing about them because mass media is not interested in them and they don’t have powerful advocates.

In Putin's speeches, he calls Russian nationalists enemies of the state. Russia has banned all influential Russian Nationalist organizations are prohibited new ones from starting. All Russian Nationalist leaders have either fled Russia, are on probation, or are under criminal investigation.

In February 2014, Putin has signed the law that increased the punishment for nationalism and racialism. He called nationalism as "extremism".  After the amendment to Penal Code was signed by the President Putin, activists of nationalists movement, (Article 282.2, part 1), can now be charged with extremism and expect the maximal possible sentence of 10 years in prison. Even during Stalin rule there were no such totalitarian laws for “hate speech”.  However, Russian can always torture even random people for false confessions.  Now any man in Russia can be charged with such a crime and arrested immediately following initiation of criminal investigation and kept in jail for the duration of the entire pretrial period. It is also now possible to tap the phones of the suspect, bug his residence and workplace, conduct surveillance, etc., without special court order. I believe this is the main “technical” reason why Putin decided to make this amendment. The regime wants not only to jail its opponents but also to spy on them legally at any moment of time. Corruption in the court system is rampant. The acquittal rate in criminal trials is around 0.5%. During Stalin's reign, it was 1-2%.

An approximate number of Russian Nationalists imprisoned during the last decade is around two thousand. Most of them are young Russians, convicted under the notorious Article 282 of the Penal Code (“incitement to racial hatred,” also colloquially known as the ‘Russian Article’ or ‘hatespeech’), usually in aftermath of conflicts with Central Asians or Caucasians muslims.

Putin's elections have rigged. Candidates who might defeat him have been blocked from registering. Ballots are stuffed. And since courts are under full Kremlin control, independent candidates cannot do anything.

Putin's neocommunist regime also continue to heroize history of the USSR.

Before enacting Holocaust Laws, Zionist slave Vladimir Putin reinstated the Soviet-era red star as the Russian military's official emblem--in the latest reincarnation of Communist symbols that has sparked fears of a return to the repressive past... On Putin's initiative, the Russian parliament earlier resurrected the music of the old Soviet anthem, and brought back the Soviet-era red banner as the military's flag. Portraits of Lenin and Stalin were openly paraded through Russian streets to mark Defender of the Fatherland Day, during 2012-2015.

President Vladimir Putin has also taken on the task of refreshing Russian history with a new perspective. He is on record lamenting the collapse of the Soviet Union as "the greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the century". As he has said: "It was worse, apparently, than World War I, worse than World War II". "Last year, the president informed a group of history teachers that Russia 'has nothing to be ashamed of Stalin and that it was their job to present a more balanced picture of Joseph Stalin, described in one approved volume as "the most successful Soviet leader ever."

In 2005 as a response to the Orange Revolution in Ukraine, Russian state media along with youth organizations launched the campaign ahead of World War II memorial celebrations. Their main symbol is Georgiyevskaya lenta. It was associated with military units in Red Army, who were awarded the collective Guard battle honors during the WWII, due to the usage of the color scheme in the "Great Patriotic War". I suppose, I don't have to remind about mass rape and murder of millions of white people by Red Army in Europe. Symbol of rape and murder of white European people became a decade ago part of state religion in Russia.

Multi-Culturalism Is Dead. Denmark's Lesson to the White race.

Originally posted by lorddreadnought at Multi-Culturalism Is Dead. Denmark's Lesson to the White race.

Muslims are only 4 percent of Denmark’s 5.4 million people but make up a majority of the country’s convicted rapists, an especially combustible issue given that practically all the female victims are non-Muslim. Similar, if lesser, disproportions are found in other crimes.

Over time, as Muslim immigrants increase in numbers, they wish less to mix with the indigenous population. A recent survey finds that only 5 percent of young Muslim immigrants would readily marry a Dane.

Forced marriages — promising a newborn daughter in Denmark to a male cousin in the home country, then compelling her to marry him, sometimes on pain of death — are one problem.

Muslim leaders openly declare their goal of introducing Islamic law once Denmark’s Muslim population grows large enough — a not-that-remote prospect. If present trends persist, one sociologist estimates, every third inhabitant of Denmark in 40 years will be Muslim.

It is easy to understand why a growing number of Danes would feel that Muslim immigrants show little respect for Danish values and laws.

An example is the phenomenon common to other European countries and Canada: some Muslims in Denmark who opted to leave the Muslim faith have been murdered in the name of Islam, while others hide in fear for their lives. Jews are also threatened and harassed openly by Muslim leaders in Denmark, a country where once Christian citizens worked to smuggle out nearly all of their 7,000 Jews by night to Sweden — before the Nazis could invade. I think of my Danish friend Elsa — who, as a teenager, had dreaded crossing the street to the bakery every morning under the eyes of occupying Nazi soldiers — and I wonder what she would say today.

In 2001, Denmark elected the most conservative government in some 70 years — one that had some decidedly non-generous ideas about liberal unfettered immigration. Today, Denmark has the strictest immigration policies in Europe. (Its effort to protect itself has been met with accusations of ‘racism’ by liberal media across Europe — even as other governments struggle to right the social problems wrought by years of too-lax immigration.)

If you wish to become Danish, you must attend three years of language classes. You must pass a test on Denmark’s history, culture, and a Danish language test. You must live in Denmark for 7 years before applying for citizenship. You must demonstrate intent to work, and have a job waiting. If you wish to bring a spouse into Denmark, you must both be over 24 years of age, and you won’t find it so easy anymore to move your friends and family to Denmark with you.

You will not be allowed to build a mosque in Copenhagen. Although your children have a choice of some 30 Arabic culture and language schools in Denmark, they will be strongly encouraged to assimilate to Danish society in ways that past immigrants weren’t.

In 2006, the Danish minister for employment, Claus Hjort Frederiksen, spoke publicly of the burden of Muslim immigrants on the Danish welfare system, and it was horrifying: the government’s welfare committee had calculated that if immigration from Third World countries were blocked, 75 percent of the cuts needed to sustain the huge welfare system in coming decades would be unnecessary. In other words, the welfare system, as it existed, was being exploited by immigrants to the point of eventually bankrupting the government. ‘We are simply forced to adopt a new policy on immigration.’

‘The calculations of the welfare committee are terrifying and show how unsuccessful the integration of immigrants has been up to now,’ he said.

A large thorn in the side of Denmark’s imams is the Minister of Immigration and Integration, Rikke Hvilshoj. She makes no bones about the new policy toward immigration, ‘The number of foreigners coming to the country makes a difference,’ Hvilshoj says, ‘There is an inverse correlation between how many come here and how well we can receive the foreigners that come.’ And on Muslim immigrants needing to demonstrate a willingness to blend in, ‘In my view, Denmark should be a country with room for different cultures and religions. Some values, however, are more important than others. We refuse to question democracy, equal rights, and freedom of speech.’

Hvilshoj has paid a price for her show of backbone. Perhaps to test her resolve, the leading radical imam in Denmark, Ahmed Abdel Rahman Abu Laban, demanded that the government pay blood money to the family of a Muslim who was murdered in a suburb of Copenhagen, stating that the family’s thirst for revenge could be thwarted for money. When Hvilshoj dismissed his demand, he argued that in Muslim culture the payment of retribution money was common, to which Hvilshoj replied that what is done in a Muslim country is not necessarily what is done in Denmark.

The Muslim reply came soon after: her house was torched while she, her husband and children slept. All managed to escape unharmed, but she and her family were moved to a secret location and she and other ministers were assigned bodyguards for the first time — in a country where such murderous violence was once so scarce.

Her government has slid to the right, and her borders have tightened. Many believe that what happens in the next decade will determine whether Denmark survives as a bastion of good living, humane thinking and social responsibility, or whether it becomes a nation at civil war with supporters of Sharia law.

Denmark have one of the highest number of sexual assaults in Europe.

Iraqis, Iranians, Turks and Somalis are dramatically overrepresented among convicted rapists in Denmark. More than 80% of convicted rapists have immigrant backgrounds or were immigrant descedants according to official data from Statistics Denmark. Immigrants and their descendants account for only ten percent of the Danish population.

It’s abolutely criminal that the government and authorities continues to hide the fact that these dramatic figures are a direct result from a growing Muslim and migration presence in Europe. To not reveal this fact to the public and allow the people a choice to decide their own future and whether to support mass migration or not is completely undemocratic. Europe’s decades of struggles to give security and equality to women and children is under threat from social engineerings and one-sided government policies that refuses to listen to facts or allow proper data to be collected.

The European Union has pushed unprotected women and children into the arms of a foreign assaulter who present a medieval mindset which endlessly victimize and targets these groups as ‘lesser worthy’ beings. Muslim societies not only encourage the attack, beating, rape and even killing of women but also legalizes it.

You cannot transform an insular and violent primitive mindset imported into a modern society by a few lectures and leaflets on rules of conduct. It can take up to three generations to change the attitude of migrants. If the culture is domineering, totalitarian and refuses to accept the host culture, then the changes rarely take place but the ideals are merely imported as a new feature into society.

One in four Muslims in Denmark feel that Danish law must be based on Koranic law mixed with basic Danish constitution, while one in ten believe Danish law must be based only on the Koran.

53.9% of the surveyed believe in Danish laws. In other words, the remaining 46.1% of Muslims surveyed want Sharia law in Denmark. The Danes assumed Muslims would integrate and adapt Danish culture. But Muslims can never assimilate since their own religion will not permit assimilation with others.

We would do well to look to Denmark, and say a prayer for her future and for our own.

The destructive media by Dr. William Pierce.

Originally posted by lorddreadnought at The destructive media by Dr. William Pierce.

What are the Jews doing with their control of the media that's harmful to us?

One of the subjects we've covered a number of times in this newsletter is the Jewish control of the news and entertainment media and the enormous damage this control is doing to America and to our people. We write about this so much because there's hardly anything in the world more important, hardly anything which demands our attention more urgently.

The evidence of the damage being done is quite obvious, but somehow many people manage to not notice that evidence. I had a newspaper reporter in my office a few weeks ago, and he asked me, "Why do you object to the Jews controlling the media? Aren't they running things about the same way anyone else would?"

I told him, "No, they're running things to fit their Jewish agenda, and that agenda is not good for us."

Then he asked me for specific examples.

Now, I really don't believe that the reporter wanted an answer to that question, because this was a man who knew which side his bread was buttered on. He couldn't afford to be thinking bad thoughts about the people on whom his career depended, but I gave him an answer anyway. I gave him some specific, concrete examples of the way in which the Jewish control of our news and entertainment media was damaging us as a people. Perhaps you'll be interested in hearing some of those examples too, and so I'll share them with you.

The first example I gave the reporter involved the largest media conglomerate in America, the Walt Disney Company. I reminded the reporter that Walt Disney, who was a Gentile -- who was one of us -- had been a pioneer in the motion picture industry. He was one of the men who built Hollywood. He built it by giving us films like Snow White and Fantasia and Cinderella. These were not just healthy, wholesome films: they were films which struck a deeply responsive chord in us, because Walt Disney shared our roots.

While Disney was winning a place in the hearts of people of European descent all over the world, the rest of Hollywood was being taken over by Jews. By the late 1920s it was apparent that not only was there money to be made in motion pictures, but motion pictures could become a very influential medium, and so Jews began taking over.

By the time Disney died he was about the only major non-Jewish film maker left in Hollywood. After his death Jews took control of the Disney company, and today it is controlled by Michael Eisner. Eisner immediately began making propaganda films designed to encourage degeneracy in viewers.

I gave to the reporter as an example of Eisner's films one that came out a couple of years ago and received all sorts of acclaim and awards from Jewish reviewers in the New York Times and other Jewish newspapers: it was The Crying Game, which was made by the Miramax division of Disney, a division headed by the Weinstein brothers. The Crying Game was a film about homosexuality and transvestitism and interracial sex. The message of the film was that these things are all right: that homosexuals and transvestites are people just like us, and that we should love them, and that it's all right for us to share their life-style.

Racial and sexual roles deliberately were made ambiguous in the film: a British soldier who just happens to be a Negro, an Irishman's mulatto girl friend who just happens to be a man wearing a dress. I doubt that I've ever seen a film with a sicker, more destructive message. And this film was held up by the Jewish media as wonderfully "sensitive," as wonderfully artistic. Nor was The Crying Game any sort of fluke or exception to the rule. Mr. Eisner has produced many other films with a similarly destructive message.

I also gave the reporter to whom I was speaking examples about the destructive way in which the Jews use their control of the news media. Do you remember the enormous hullabaloo in the news media a few months ago when two White soldiers at Fort Bragg, in North Carolina, got drunk and shot a convicted Black crack dealer and his female companion? It was on the television news and in the big newspapers day after day after day. "Racism in the Army!" the headlines were screaming. News commentators wrung their hands and agonized over "White supremacy" at Fort Bragg. "What can we do about White supremacy in the military?" they moaned. And, of course, the politicians, who certainly know which side their bread is buttered on, had to get into the act. The White House issued statements. The secretary of the Army announced that an investigation would be launched to find out about White racists in the Army and then to boot them out when it found them. We were treated to tearful television interviews with the relatives of the slain Black crack dealer. We're still hearing about the killing of this convicted Black criminal by two drunken White soldiers, as Jewish groups continue to use it as an example in their media campaign for new laws against what they call "hate crimes" and "hate speech." Just two weeks ago there was yet another big article about it headed "Extremism in the Ranks" in Newsweek magazine, which is owned by the Jewish Washington Post. Everybody has heard about this shooting at Fort Bragg.

Now I'll tell you about a shooting you haven't heard about -- unless you happen to live in the immediate vicinity of Camp Pendleton, the big Marine base in southern California. Last month, on March 5, 1996, a 28-year-old Marine sergeant who was stationed at Camp Pendleton hid a .45-caliber pistol under his jacket, walked into the office of the executive officer of his unit, Lt. Colonel Daniel Kidd, and shot Kidd twice in the back, killing him. He then turned his pistol on the commanding officer, Lt. Col. Thomas Heffner, and shot Heffner in the chest, critically wounding him.

Both Lt. Colonel Kidd and Lt. Colonel Heffner are White. The murderer, Sergeant Jessie Quintanilla, is a dark-skinned Pacific Islander from Guam. When Quintanilla ran out of the office after shooting the two White officers, he shouted that he had done it "for the Brown side" and that the killings of Whites would continue until all non-Whites are released from prison.

Amazingly, not even the San Diego-area newspapers, which could hardly avoid at least reporting the bare facts of the shootings, suggested that race was a motive or that the killing of Lt. Colonel Kidd was a "hate crime." They ignored the race factor. The national media, so far as I am aware, have scrupulously avoided the whole story. No statements from the White House, no call for investigations of Brown racism in the Marines, no headlines anywhere about "extremism," no calls from Jewish organizations for new laws to control "haters" in the military.

Now, what is the difference between the shootings at Fort Bragg and the shootings at Camp Pendleton which could have justified the glaring difference in the way they were treated by the controlled news media? Was it that the Fort Bragg shootings were a more serious crime than the Camp Pendleton shootings? Was the killing of a convicted Black drug dealer by two drunken White soldiers more newsworthy than the cold-blooded murder of a White Marine Corps officer with an outstanding service record by a non-White sergeant with a hatred of White people? Was the Fort Bragg shooting more cause for concern on the part of ordinary Americans than the Camp Pendleton shooting?

I don't think so.

Let me suggest that the difference in the way in which the shootings were treated by the news media stems from the fact that the Jewish bosses of the media have an agenda of their own, and they slant the news accordingly. They make the news fit their agenda. The Jews who control the news media have a program to "sensitize" White Americans about racial matters, and by that I mean that they want to instill in White Americans a sense of White racial guilt, to make White Americans feel that any sense of White racial solidarity is reprehensible, to persuade them that any White resistance to demands by non-Whites is "racist" and therefore wicked.

And so they deliberately -- I say deliberately, knowingly, calculatingly -- create the impression with their biased and selective reporting of the news that White attacks on non-Whites are a far bigger problem than non-White attacks on Whites, whereas exactly the opposite is true. The shooting at Fort Bragg suited the Jews' purpose, and so they gave it enormous publicity and drummed it into everyone's consciousness. The shooting at Camp Pendleton didn't suit their purpose, and so they gave it minimal coverage in the news media they control. That's the sort of thing I have in mind when I say that the Jewish control of the media is doing enormous damage to our people. It's giving the average American a grossly distorted view of the world.

I'll give you another example, one which most of us probably have heard about. In Chicago earlier this year a White mother and her two young children were murdered by Blacks in an especially horrible manner. The White woman was slashed open with a butcher knife, and an unborn infant was ripped from her womb by Blacks who wanted the baby. The woman's children, a ten-year-old daughter and an eight-year-old son, were stabbed to death. These were racial killings, but because the victims were White and the murderers were Black most of the media would have preferred to ignore them. The unusually atrocious nature of the crime caught the attention of the tabloids, however, and so the rest of the news media were obliged to give it minimal and grudging coverage. But there were no demands from Jewish organizations, like the Anti-Defamation League and the Southern Poverty Law Center, for new "hate crime" laws because of these hate-inspired murders. There were no hand-wringing editorials about the murders in the New York Times or the Washington Post. The television networks wasted no tears on the victims. The whole attitude of the media was: the less said about these murders the better.

Can you imagine how different the treatment by the media would have been if the races of the victims and the murderers had been interchanged? Imagine that a gang of neo-Nazi skinheads had grabbed a pregnant Black woman and her two Black children, had stabbed the Black children to death and then killed the Black woman by ripping her open with a knife and tearing her unborn child from her body and running off with it. That would have been on the front page and the editorial page of the New York Times, the Washington Post, and every other Jewish newspaper in the country for weeks. Tom Brokaw and Dan Rather would still be telling us about it every evening. Every television screen in the country would still be full of politicians, priests, and rabbis telling us what we must do to eliminate "White racism." They would be telling us what kind of "racist" books and "racist" radio programs and "racist" music the skinheads were exposed to which led them to kill the Black family. And of course, spokesmen for the Southern Poverty Law Center and the Anti-Defamation League would be given non-stop media coverage as they clamored for laws to make Politically Incorrect speech illegal. You know that's the way it would be handled.

And that sort of slanted news is damaging, because tens of millions of White Americans actually believe what they see on television and read in the newspapers. They cannot distinguish between the real world and the slanted world portrayed by the media masters. They assume that real people behave the way the actors in Mr. Eisner's The Crying Game behaved; moreover, they assume that's approved behavior. They assume that the news stories selected for the evening television news programs are truly representative of what is happening in the world. Their opinions and attitudes are shaped by the slanted world of the media rather than by the real world. In the long run this Jewish media control is not just damaging: it is lethal. It will destroy us. And that, of course, is just what it is intended to do.

Here's another specific example of the way in which the Jewish control of our media is used to damage us as a people. Do you remember the Republic of South Africa? Do you remember what the media did to that country? Let me remind you. For years the mass media in America maintained a solid wall of hostility against South Africa. The Whites there were unspeakably wicked, according to the media, because they practiced a system they called "apartheid," which simply means apartness, or separation of the races.

Now, it is true that we always have had a busybody element among our own people -- egalitarians and other foolish or malicious types who always are looking for an opportunity to force others to conform to their ideas -- but without the support of the Jewish media the busybody element would not have been able to do much damage. It was the controlled media which made "apartheid" a dirty word; it was the controlled media which made the attitude toward South Africa a major political issue in this country; it was the controlled media which made a government enforced boycott of trade with South Africa politically popular; it was the controlled media which viciously attacked anyone who had a good word to say about South Africa; it was the controlled media over here which provided a forum for the handful of South African traitors and terrorists who were trying to destabilize their own society.

And ultimately it was the controlled media which destroyed South Africa. As the economic damage to South Africa from the trade boycott mounted, White South Africans found themselves under increasing pressure. Furthermore, they were being subjected to the same anti-White hate propaganda that we were. The films they saw, the television programs they watched in South Africa came from Hollywood and New York. And eventually the South Africans became so demoralized that they foolishly turned their country over to Black rule, hoping that somehow that would make the world love them and their economy would improve.

What actually has happened, of course, is that crime and mismanagement have skyrocketed and standards have fallen, and now the White South Africans who are able to go some place else are leaving. What has happened to every other country in sub-Saharan Africa after the Whites turned the government over to the Blacks is now happening to South Africa. It is slipping back toward the jungle. And the controlled media in America played the largest single role in bringing this result about.

And this result was deliberate. It was calculated. It was planned. It was not because of any fuzzy-minded, do-gooder sentiment on the part of the media bosses. They knew exactly what they were doing. It was cold-blooded. Compare this media concern with equality for Blacks in South Africa with the attitude of the media toward the behavior of the Jewish government in Israel. That government practices what is known as collective punishment. If a Palestinian is suspected of being a freedom fighter -- suspected, not convicted -- the Jewish government punishes his whole family. His wife, his parents, his children will be arrested and tortured. The house they live in will be blown up. Have you ever heard the controlled media criticize this sort of behavior?

Now, patriots have various concerns, various priorities. Some of them believe that we should concern ourselves first and foremost with the way the U.S. government handles its finances, with ruinous taxation and scandalous welfare programs. Some of them believe that our out-of-control immigration situation is our most pressing problem. Others are concerned primarily with the government's failure to deal effectively with street crime. And some have focused on the breakdown of our educational system under the impact of forced equality, or on the decay of our morals.

But I tell you that we can solve none of these problems until we regain control of our news and entertainment media. So long as the Jews control our mass media they will control our politicians, and so long as they control our politicians they will control the policies of the government. We will not be able to shut down the welfare system or control our borders or make our cities safe or restore our standards and values so long as the controlled mass media are able to make a majority of our people feel guilty for wanting to do these things, so long as the media are able to make people believe that keeping Mexicans and Haitians out of the country or shutting off the flow of welfare is racist, and that racism is the worst of all sins.

So long as the Jews control our mass media they will be able to keep enough of our people confused and misled and divided so that we cannot regain control of our government by peaceful, democratic means.

If we are to regain control of our destiny and survive as a people, then we have only two choices: violent revolution to take the control of the mass media back by force, or gentle but effective persuasion to lead more and more of our people from confusion into understanding.

I personally believe that violent revolution is not feasible at this time, and as long as the course of gentle persuasion remains open to us, that is the course we must choose. I believe that the only proper thing for us to do now is to continue building our own media and making them more effective -- media like our series of radio broadcasts and our World Wide Web sites on the Internet and the books and magazines published by National Vanguard Books.

What happened to the Republic of South Africa after black animals gained the political power.

Originally posted by lorddreadnought at What happened to the Republic of South Africa after black animals gained the political power.

The worldwide media portrays Nelson Mandella as a larger-than-life heroic figure and the liberator of his people. But is that truth or fiction? And how will honest historians judge him?

The official story goes something like this: Nelson Rolihlahla Mandela was born in 1918 into the Thembu tribe’s royal family. He studied law at two prestigious universities and became involved in “anti-colonial politics,” joining the African National Congress (ANC).

He was committed to non-violent protest in gaining sovereignty for blacks. In 1962 he was arrested and convicted of sabotage and conspiracy to overthrow the government and was sentenced to life in prison.

An international campaign lobbied for his release, which was granted in 1990, and he was hailed as martyr of white racism by the international media. This popularity propelled him to be elected president of South Africa in 1994, where he continued with his struggle to “end ethnic tensions and bring about racial equality.” Over the years, Mandela has received over 250 awards, including the 1993 Nobel Peace Prize, the U.S. Presidential Medal of Freedom and the Soviet Order of Lenin.

That’s the official story. His critics, however, have a different opinion.

They point to the fact that Mandela was not imprisoned for opposing apartheid, or segregation, in Africa, but for being a communist terrorist murderer-bomber in service to the Soviet Union.

The ANC’s guerrilla force, known as uMkhonto we Sizwe—MK, or “Spear of the Nation”—was founded in 1961 by Mandela and his advisor, the Lithuanian-born communist Jew Joe Slovo, born Yossel Mashel Slovo, who was officially named secretary general of the South African Communist Party in 1986.

Slovo had been the planner of many of the ANC terrorist attacks, as detailed in the book Victory or Violence: The Story of the AWB of South Africa, including the January 8, 1982 attack on the Koeberg nuclear power plant near Cape Town, the Church Street bombing on May 20, 1983, which killed 19 people, and the June 14, 1986 car-bombing of Magoo’s Bar in Durban, in which three people were killed and 73 injured.

In 1962, Mandela was arrested along with 19 others, half of whom were White communist Jews, in a police raid of ANC headquarters at a farm owned by Andrew Goldreich, also a communist Jew, at Rivonia, a Johannesburg suburb.

In the Rivonia Trial, which took place between 1963 and 1964, the defendants were tried for 221 acts of sabotage designed to overthrow the government and conspiring to aid foreign military units, when they invaded SA to further the objects of communism.

The prosecutor, Percy Yutar said at the trial that “production requirements for munitions were sufficient to blow up a city the size of Johannesburg.”

Escaping the death sentence, Mandela was given life in prison.

By 1990, the communists behind Mandela had gained enough power to force his release. Apartheid was abolished in 1992 and the ANC was put into power in 1994 with Mandela as president. Slovo became his secretary of housing.

Shortly thereafter, Mandela and Slovo, along with a group of ANC leaders, were filmed chanting a pledge to kill all whites in South Africa.

Current South African President Jacob Zuma, also of the ANC, was also filmed as late as January 2012 singing a song called “Kill the Boer” in front of a crowd of thousands of blacks while they cheered and danced. The song advocates the murder of the descendents of the original white settlers of South Africa, with lyrics encouraging blacks to gun down the farmers with machine guns.

Mandela’s ex-wife Winnie, also a longtime ANC activist, prefers a method called “necklacing,” where a gasoline-filled tire is placed around the neck of a victim and set ablaze. “With our boxes of matches and our necklaces we shall liberate this country,” she is infamous for saying.

(Mandela was in solitary confinement at the time of the necklacing torture-murders. An estimated 3,000 victims died by necklacing.)

Since 1994, 68,000 whites have been brutally tortured and murdered by blacks in South Africa, in ways too gruesome to describe, including almost 4,000 Boers whose farms were confiscated by savage murderers, a combined area of over 25,000 square miles.

Contrary to popular belief, the vast majority of blacks in South Africa aren’t natives, but came by the millions from neighboring countries only after the white Boers created a country with a thriving economy, education opportunities and medical benefits.

Under white rule, blacks in South Africa enjoyed better living conditions than any other African country, where blacks kill each other in tribal warfare.

In 1994, the same year Mandela took power, the Hutu tribe killed 800,000 Tutsis in Rwanda. Similar tribal genocides have taken place in Congo, Somalia, Ethiopia, Chad, Mali, Zimbabwe, Angola and many more African countries. Tribal savagery and genocide has always been a way of life for Africans.

Since Mandela took over, South Africa has become a Third World country. It went from being the safest country in Africa, to being the rape and murder capital of the world. In Johannesburg, 5,000 people are murdered every year. Unemployment went from 5% in 1994 to 50% today.

South Africa also has the largest number of people infected with HIV/AIDS in the world. In 2007, over 18% of adults, or 5,700,000 people had AIDS. In 2010, an estimated 280,000 died of AIDS.

Looking beyond the media myth of a “negro demigod Mandela” as he faced his twilight, one can only say, “good riddance.”

Source: http://americanfreepress.net/the-real-mandela/?print=print

Red Patriarch of Russia.

Originally posted by lorddreadnought at Red Patriarch of Russia.

Russia expert David Satter, a former Moscow correspondent for the Financial Times (of London) and the Wall Street Journal, wrote of the election in 2009 for Forbes: "According to material from the Soviet archives, Kirill was a KGB agent (as was Alexei). This means he was more than just an informer, of whom there were millions in the Soviet Union. He was an active officer of the organization. Neither Kirill nor Alexei ever acknowledged or apologized for their ties with the security agencies".

Patriarch Kirill of Moscow and All Russia quotes:

“A crackdown on far-right movements is the path we must follow today in order to lead interethnic relations out of their current dangerous state,” Patriarch Kirill told reporters in response to Saturday’s riot on Manezhnaya Square in central Moscow.

”Hate crimes are endangering Russia’s progress and should be stopped at all cost.”

“Russia needs to revive Soviet-era sense of solidarity.”

“Russia should build itself around all the good things that made the Soviet era stand out.”

We must never forget the achievement of the Soviet people, “and not just the military.”

“What about those Komsomol members (young Communists) who gathered crops, built the BAM (Baikal-Amur Mainline railway), without getting awards or privileges in return? It is a sense of teamwork, a sense of desiring to join efforts and do something good for your country.”

The idea of unity and continuity of the historical memory, protecting the national heritage against falsifications, against biased misinterpretation of the past reality “must form a base of values for cooperation among political forces,” the patriarch said.

Putin Named best Friend in the World to Organized Crime.

Originally posted by lorddreadnought at Putin Named best Friend in the World to Organized Crime.

Global Financial Integrity Organization have found that during last decade Russia has lost more than US$ 1 trillion in illicit capital outflows. Over the period 1994–2012 total illicit flows (outflows and inflows combined) totaled US$3.27 trillion. Fully 87 percent of illicit outflows—and 99 percent of illicit inflows—from 1994 to 2012 were due to the misinvoicing of trade, confirming its importance as the most important mechanism for illicit financial flows. Russia excels some African countries in terms of corruption - 154th place out of 178th. The Russian press mentioned that Vladimir Putin has secret savings of more than 40 billion dollars. The eternal question is: "Who Lives Well in Russia?"  At different times, they were different people, but now everyone knows that life is only good for the super-rich oligarchs, mostly Jews. According to a report by Russian banking website lenta.ru, which gives the 48 Jews on the list a combined net worth of $132.9 billion, while Jews account for only 0,16% of Russian population. The whole wealth of Russian billionaries is less than 300 billion.

Vladimir Putin has been named the 2014 Person of the Year by the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP), an award given annually to the person who does the most to enable and promote organized criminal activity.

Putin was recognized for his work in turning Russia into a major money-laundering center; for enabling organized crime in Crimea and in the Donbass region of eastern Ukraine; for his unblemished record of failing to prosecute criminal activity; and for advancing a government policy of working with and using crime groups as a component of state policy.

“Putin has been a finalist every year so you might consider this a lifetime achievement award,” said Drew Sullivan, editor of OCCRP. “He has been a real innovator in working with organized crime. He has created a military-industrial-political-criminal complex that furthers Russia’s and Putin’s personal interests. I think Putin sees those interests as one and the same.”

Putin, a former KGB bureaucrat, began arresting most major organized crime figures in Russia several years ago, but then quietly released them. That was the start of Russia’s state policy of working with organized crime. OCCRP believes that Putin agreed to tolerate criminality in exchange for criminals’ support in advancing what he defined as Russian interests.

"Vladimir Putin and his siloviki fused a Cold War mentality with modern organized crime strategies and technology to create a new level of transnational organized crime,” said Paul Radu, executive director of OCCRP. “The Russian-backed money laundering platforms have exploited the lack of transparency in the global financial and offshore company registrations systems to create a new criminal financial infrastructure used by crime groups from as far away as Mexico and Vietnam".

For example, OCCRP looked at a sophisticated money-laundering system set up with the help of Russian and Moldovan organized crime that used Russian banks (including one connected to Vladimir Putin’s cousin Igor), fake bank loans, and corrupt Moldovan judges. The system moved the money of oligarchs, crooked government officials and organized crime into Europe through a Latvian bank. Money moved through the system was used to support Putin’s political interests.

In another project, OCCRP's partners aired a documentary which looked at the links between the state owned Russian Railways (which is close to Putin), a notorious banker known as the Black Banker who was shot in London, a slew of organized crime figures and hired assassins and a Russian/Moldovan businessman who also ran a pro-Russian political party in Moldova. The video was responsible in part for a decision by the Moldovan government to ban the Patria party on the eve of the elections because they received illegal financial assistance from Russia. Patria’s leader, fearing arrest, fled to Russia where Russian officials defended him publicly.

Organized crime figures have served as intermediaries for weapons transfers between the Russian army and Russian-backed separatist rebels in Ukraine. Working undercover, OCCRP reporters bought weapons from organized crime figures in Moldova; the weapons originated with the Russian 14th army in the breakaway region of Moldova known as Transnistria.

Putin’s government has forced the closure of media and civil society groups that have looked at its corrupt practices and ended the year in ironic fashion by finding its fiercest critic, blogger Alexey Navalny, guilty of corruption.

Putin was chosen as Person of the Year by more than 125 OCCRP-affiliated investigative reporters and 20 investigative reporting organizations in countries from Europe to Central Asia.

“For years Putin has created buffer states run by organized crime thugs, like Transnistria, South Ossetia, Abkhazia and now Crimea and the Donbass,” Sullivan said. “While there is a long history of criminal groups working with governments around the world, both in the West and in the former Soviet Union, Putin has institutionalized these connections in ways never seen before.”

Runners up to Putin this year were Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban and Montenegrin Prime Minister Milo Djukanovic. Previous winners include the Romanian Parliament for its role in legalizing crime in 2013 and Ilham Aliyev, the President of Azerbaijan, in 2012 for his role in taking large cuts of state business.

OCCRP is a not-for-profit consortium of regional investigative centers and for profit independent media stretching from Europe to Central Asia and in Latin America. Its goal is to help the public understand how organized crime and corruption affect their lives and to improve reporting on the issues of corruption and criminality. OCCRP seeks to provide in-depth investigative stories as well as the latest news pertaining to organized crime and corruption activities around the world. It is funded by the Open Society Foundations, USAID, European governments and other major international donors. It has offices in Sarajevo, Bucharest, and Tbilisi.

Source: https://www.occrp.org/personoftheyear/2014/

Illegal and destructive activities of Vladimir Putin against national defense of Russia.

Originally posted by lorddreadnought at Illegal and destructive activities of Vladimir Putin against national defense of Russia.

On Mar 26 2000, V Putin was elected President, and in this position will be until May 2007. At the same time he will become the Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces of Russia.

President concentrates in his hands unlimited, extremely important to control the state and society, authority. The President determines the main directions of domestic and foreign policy, approve the military doctrine of the Russian Federation. He also generates the Russian government and oversees its activities, is of great powers in the legislative process, having the right of nomination of legislative initiatives, signing and promulgation of laws. The exclusive powers of the President are largely determinative in the life of society and state. So he, like no other, and bears full responsibility for the destiny of the peoples of Russia and the security of homeland.

For nearly 15 years in Russia pours golden petrodollars like rain. The government has formed a huge funds (stabilization, development, and so on) abroad, not releasing appropriate money on defense and security.

The Putin’s plan of destruction of Russian national defense has been and continues to be carried out methodically in many areas.

Military staff.

Expulsion from the armed forces of professional staff. No one else but V Putin on Feb 15 2004 appointed to the post of Defense Minister philologist by education S Ivanov, incapable of deep analysis and building defence policy in the larger perspective. To replace him on such a responsible post he appointed A Serdyukov, engaged in the furniture business and has no relation to military affairs.

Like all amateurs, S Ivanov and A Serdyukov were unable and unwilling to endure professionals around them, intelligent and moral people. So they expelled from the armed forces the best, most respected, talented commanders. Among them the commander of the Army aviation, Col-Gen Vitaly Pavlov, range aviation commander, Lt-Gen Mikhail Oparin, Black Sea fleet commander Adm Vladimir Komoedov, the chief of the Main Operational Directorate of the General staff, Col-Gen Alexander Rukshin. Sent to the honorable the link commander of the strategic missile forces, Army Gen Vladimir Yakovlev… Energetic, talented generals, who knows, loves the army, and they were one with it, with those with whom they studied, served, fought, who were put in position, raised, raised. This unity, a powerful spirit, destroyed the commander-in-chief. Refer to the resignation of combat and talented General, a true patriot Alexander Skorodumov, responsible for combat training of the Armed Forces of Russia. In it he noted:
The army no longer needed professionals… do not want to serve, if the position we put forward not by merit, but by acquaintance.

Intelligence bases.

V. Putin’s is also responsible for systematic destruction of military science and military educational institutions, the destruction of the Russian intelligence center. On his command, Russia has gone from legendary military base during the Vietnam Cam Ranh Bay, faithfully serving Russian and Soviet interests more than 20 years. The powerful center of the radio, an airport with multiple runways, modern Marina, station electronic surveillance, school, hospital, residential buildings, separate mixed aviation regiment which was four strategic bomber Tu-95, four Tu-142, a squadron of Tu-16 and MiG-25… Lost a strategically important base for Russia, providing Russian naval presence in the Indian ocean and the Persian Gulf. Not only left Cam Ranh. Went with a base in Cienfuegos in Cuba in close proximity to US shores, has closed three electronic intelligence centres in Angola, two bases in Somalia: military air base in Hargeisa and Navy in Berbere and other places. After leaving Vietnam, the only base listening to the Russian security services remained the center of electronic intelligence at Lourdes (Cuba).

The possibilities of this modernized in 1997, the year of the Russian e-centre is allowed to intercept even messages with US communications satellites, telecommunication cables, control the communication center of NASA in Florida. The Minister of Defense of Cuba Raul Castro not without reason said that 70% of residentially Russian security services had with Lourdes. And this base Putin eliminated. A powerful complex electronic reconnaissance “Ramona” in Ansan city, Korea province Hwange allow our intelligence to monitor US aircraft in Japan, where, as we know, only in Okinawa there are 11 US military bases.

Finding Russian intelligence center at Lourdes in Cuba and in Cam Ranh Bay in Vietnam was a vital moment in the security of the Russian Federation. They have to keep. V Putin acted differently, they were destroyed by doing the will of the US administration and caused thereby colossal damage to Russian interests. Do not dare to do even B. Yeltsin, which was followed by similar proposals US. Destruction of the prosecution as regards the direct act of betrayal and sees in the actions of V Putin not only signs, but also the crime of treason to the state.

Nuclear warfare.

In conditions of extreme backwardness of Russia’s conventional forces from NATO countries, which cannot be eliminated in the coming years, the last support and the basis for the security of the country is its strategic nuclear forces. But here the treacherous policy of Putin has been disastrous for Russia. I would like to dwell on some points, as the experts will complement me. I will start with statements by the Director of the Moscow Institute of heat Yuri Solomonov, the developer of rocket complexes “Topol-M”, that Russia has lost more than 200 technologies for production of ballistic missiles, which significantly undermines the defense of Russia. Under the state program of armaments in Russia for 2007-2015 must be purchased 17 ICBMs Topol-M”. On the Russian armed forces will be 68 ICBM Topol-M in silo launchers, and 69 ICBMs of the same type, but in the mobile version. However, by this time will be a multiple exceeded the warranty time combat operation, all without exception ICBMs fixed in the USSR at the time of the signing of the Treaty on strategic offensive reductions Treaty (START-1, 1991), and they will be removed from combat duty. Thus by Dec 31 2015 we will have 147 land-based ICBMs with 351 nuclear warheads. It is even worse in marine nuclear triad.


Because of state treason under Putin’s direct orders, at extremely low prices were sold to China the heavy aircraft-carrying cruisers “Minsk”, “Novorossiysk”, “Kyiv”, cruisers “Zozulya”, “Fokin”, “Murmansk”, a half dozen destroyers and large anti-submarine ships. With the sale of heavy vehicles for Russia actually said goodbye to the world ocean and ceased to be a great Maritime power. Its aircraft carrier fleet eventually got China at bargain prices, which now gives its modernization. In 1989 in Finland by order of the Navy of the USSR was built the world’s most powerful unique rescue tug “Fotiy Krylov” with the power plant in 25,000 horsepower, able to pull even the largest aircraft carriers at sea state eight knots. It was a unique rescue complex with modern diving equipment, hyperbaric chamber, underwater cameras, underwater welding and cutting metal, other modern equipment. However, it was sold to Greece and the Russian Navy has lost another opportunity to assist ships in distress, including the submarine “Kursk”.

During Putin’s reign, the Navy of Russia has decreased by almost two times. As at the end of 2007, for example, there was 1 aircraft carrying cruisers, 2 heavy cruisers, 1 of them in repair, 4 guided missile cruisers, 9 destroyers and large anti-submarine ships. By 2015 in the Russian Navy will remain no more than 60 submarines and ships of the 1st and 2nd grade and almost all the outdated samples. By this time, the US fleet will increase to 300 ships of the same class.

In 1991 Russia from the USSR passed 55 nuclear submarines strategic purpose, and they are all by 2015 will be removed from combat duty. Tragically, from 1990 to 2007 in Russia was not built a single nuclear submarine strategic purpose. High combat resistance possessed mobile railway complex RT-23, the rocket which was equipped with not one warhead as “poplar”, and 10 PS. While in the travelling position the complex had the appearance of a normal car refrigerator, so to find his means of observation was impossible. It is symptomatic that the US administration quietly refers to the presence of SRF complexes “Topol”, but persistently sought from the Russian leadership, the elimination of the RT-23. In 1990s this requirement of the US was not fulfilled, all complexes RT-23 remained a part of the strategic missile